- Joined
- Dec 1, 2022
- Messages
- 783
- Reaction score
- 1,264
Hi There,
Well, Another .32 CF SA has come into my collection. It is in its
wooden case and has some features I find interesting.
I initially bought it because it is the first one I have found that
doesn't have the "V" patent dates on the top strap over the
cylinder.
There seems to be poor documentation on this anomaly. In the
SCS&W 4th. Ed., It states "Early Models: More than 1,000 of
the first guns did not have the patent markings (which are found
on the rear of the top strap above the cylinder ..."
In the ubiquitous Smith & Wesson 1857 - 1945... it is written
that the patent dates were added between serial numbers 1216
and 1405.
This revolver (SN 1355) fits the above information but I have
SN 1102 which does have these patent date. And I have loca-
ted an example with SN 1804 which does not have these pat-
ent dates.
Anyway, here are a few pics of my "new" revolver.
Cheers!
Webb
Well, Another .32 CF SA has come into my collection. It is in its
wooden case and has some features I find interesting.
I initially bought it because it is the first one I have found that
doesn't have the "V" patent dates on the top strap over the
cylinder.
There seems to be poor documentation on this anomaly. In the
SCS&W 4th. Ed., It states "Early Models: More than 1,000 of
the first guns did not have the patent markings (which are found
on the rear of the top strap above the cylinder ..."
In the ubiquitous Smith & Wesson 1857 - 1945... it is written
that the patent dates were added between serial numbers 1216
and 1405.
This revolver (SN 1355) fits the above information but I have
SN 1102 which does have these patent date. And I have loca-
ted an example with SN 1804 which does not have these pat-
ent dates.
Anyway, here are a few pics of my "new" revolver.
Cheers!
Webb