I all for the new 19, it should bring down the prices on the older
models.
models.
I would have guessed the opposite in the case of the 4 inch. Round butt, stainless barrel and IL all go to show they can't duplicate the original."They don't make em like that anymore" just enhances the value of the Model 19I all for the new 19, it should bring down the prices on the older
models.
I all for the new 19, it should bring down the prices on the older
models.
I'll bet it has no effect on older (i.e., original) Model 19 prices whatsoever. It's a completely different market as I see it... those who want the real thing vs. those willing to settle for a newly-manufactured replica.I would have guessed the opposite in the case of the 4 inch. Round butt, stainless barrel and IL all go to show they can't duplicate the original."They don't make em like that anymore" just enhances the value of the Model 19
I also think bringing this new version to market is a good idea, but it will not significantly change the demand for the originals.
Yeah , some of the pre-lock , pre MIM , 19s I see selling on online auctions go for some pretty amazing prices. I would be interested in hearing how accurate this new 19 is. Some of my most accurate Smiths are my 1990 and newer 686-4s, 66-5 and 629-5.
I've never had an opportunity to shoot a two piece barrel gun before, but I've not seen any complaints on Dan Wesson guns and very very few on S&W's - except maybe one loosening up?
I Like It !
So tired of seeing plastic, polymer, painted , tactical ,semi autos..... ad nauseam .
This just put a smile on my old face and a song in my heart.
Blue steel and custom wood grips... Oh Yes.
I'm going to start saving my nickels and dimes right now !
The "dreaded" lock is a non issue to me....don't see it as a problem at all.
And I totally agree with post #63...only accurate revolvers are interesting
Gary
Darn I should have passed on my old M19-3 4" like new for $300,but guess I can live with it. They do not turn up very often anymore. The new one will fill in the gap for those searching today. I am happy with the old old one. I like the carbon blue guns,they are smoother and hold up better than stainless.
It makes the firearms compatible with Canadian law which requires a 105MM minimum barrel lengthDoes anyone know the rationale behind the extra .25" of barrel length on newer Smith and Ruger DA revolvers? Seems like it's only purpose is to make all of my existing holsters obsolete.
Gotta love capitalism.
Tom,I've never had an opportunity to shoot a two piece barrel gun before, but I've not seen any complaints on Dan Wesson guns and very very few on S&W's - except maybe one loosening up?
Why would anyone want a S&W Model 19, when they could have a S&W Model 66?
You can go shopping for a new "classic" S&W today around town and go home with probably 10 or more of them by the end of the day.
They are sitting
Now the no lock new J frames, grab one when you see it. It will be gone within a week or less.
The L-Comp was originally (2000) advertised as being cut for moonclipsRover, I think you will find the Carry Comp is a one piece barrel unlike the 4.25". By virtue of the design of the power ported Smith barrels I don't see how a 2 piece barrel would be possible. I would also expect it is cut for moonclips. While it doesn't mention them on Smiths website, it also doesn't mention it for the 586 L-Comp.
I am a walnut and blued steel man. Occasional stainless. Hate black and plastic, and am not real fond of alloys either
I hope some of the youngins among us buy them because it will help keep the mothership in the revolver business (and in business in general), but it's not for an old fogey like me. I've been spoiled for life by the real thing.
I tried to buy a "Classic" a couple times, but I just couldn't bring myself to do it.Why buy an imitation when you can still go out and find the real thing?
![]()
If revolver sales are down, which I don't believe for a second. It's because of people bitching about how things aren't made the same way anymore and refusing to buy the newer guns. News flash people, times change, so do methods and materials. Smith isn't going to return to pinned barrels and recessed chambers, Colt isn't going to start hand fitting Pythons and Royal Bluing guns again, Ruger isn't going to bring back the Security Six. Sounds like a bunch of old farts arguing about the merits of a Studebaker versus a Packard.
Thank you for the "insight"!Let me offer a little insight as to why any of us are buying pistols like this.