No test has been published which enables anyone to identify the "best". You would do well with any of the recent bullets from major makers. Look for Winchester Rangers, Speer Gold Dots and Remington Golden Sabers. Look for a 124-grain +P hollowpoint at a minimum. And test them to make sure that they function well and are accurate in your gun - guns are very individual with what they like sometimes.
Based on having done this, I carry Speer 124-gr +P short barrel Gold Dots in my 3" CZ RAMI and Winchester 127-gr +P+ Ranger (RA9TA) in my 4" Sigma.
The most important thing is that you shoot your gun accurately and place your shots into the vitals. This requires your gun to function, it requires shot-placement, and it requires adequate penetration. Any decent 9x19 JHP on the market should be able to handle this from your 908. There is no magic bullet, but you should be able to do well with any number of them out there.![]()
Just stay clear of the weak, worthless and malfunction-prone 147 grain ammo in your 9mm.
Thanks for reply!I agree with everything you stated.The guy at the range told me to buy Corbon,he swore and praised and went on and on of what a great bullet they are, from the way they are manufactured to the way they are tested and the way there are individually inspected before packaging.VERY EXPENSIVE tho, which isn't a problem if there that good and you are defending your life or your family's life..........
Just stay clear of the weak, worthless and malfunction-prone 147 grain ammo in your 9mm.
What is the best self defense ammo for a 9mm
What is the best self defense ammo for a 9mm,specifically S&W 909?Thanks!
This may be the wrong approach and perhaps a gross simplification, but generally regardless of the caliber I look to: 1) Does it have an advertised velocity of at least 1100 feet per second but not more than around 1300;
From my experience, just about any good quality JHP round would be A-OK. I've used Golden Sabers, Gold Dots, Winchester Ranger, Federal HST, and Hornady Critical Defense. It's all good.
Determining which of the above would be "best" is just picking nits.
Elmer, I totally disagree with your assesment of 147 grn loads. My department issued this weight load and it worked quite well with the vast majority of documented cases being one shot stops. Guys like Fackler and Roberts recommend this weight for good reason, it works.
Perhaps the most useful post in the thread.
Far more effort is often expended trying to find the "magic bullet" than in practicing with the firearm in question. That's always the advice given by any legitimate expert in the field of wound ballistics. Shot placement will always trump bullet selection.
Having said that, there are ways of determining which projectiles meet minimum standards. There is still ammunition being sold today, billed as "superior performance", that exhibits characteristics 180 degrees different than what is universally accepted as ideal by the majority of wound ballistics experts. Those rounds are often touted in gun magazines as having the best "stopping power", by famous gunwriters with little qualifications, and often financial ties to the companies they write about, (along with advertising dollars directed towards those magazines), or in a long ago discredited book.
From my experience, just about any good quality JHP round would be A-OK. I've used Golden Sabers, Gold Dots, Winchester Ranger, Federal HST, and Hornady Critical Defense. It's all good.
Determining which of the above would be "best" is just picking nits.
As far as "experts", there aren't any. Those that study ballistics and compile statics, in the end can only form their own opinion. The problem with so called experts is that they can all study the same facts and they still have differing findings and opinions. One man's opinion ain't good enough for me.