Senate Set to Vote on Another Anti-gun Judge

Louis

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Location
Berwyn PA USA
Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102,
Springfield, VA 22151
703-321-8585
Gun Owners of America

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Here we go again.

First, there was Sonia Sotomayor. Then there was David Hamilton.

Now, we have another radical, anti-gun judge that has been nominated for the federal judiciary. His name is Louis Butler, and he is so radical, he was twice rejected by the people of Wisconsin (which is, by the way, one of the most liberal states in our union).

When Louis Butler first ran for the Wisconsin Supreme Court -- the voters rejected him by a 2-1 margin. When he was appointed to that court by Democrat Governor Jim Doyle and then stood for retention by the voters, they again rejected him. This was the first time a member of the Wisconsin Supreme Court was rejected by the voters in more than 40 years.

More importantly, Louis Butler opposes the rights of gun owners. The right to bear arms in the Wisconsin Constitution expressly notes that this right is for personal security and "any other lawful purpose." But in State v. Fischer, Judge Butler was the deciding vote in 2006 to hold that a Wisconsin statute barring carrying a concealed weapon for any purpose, at any time, including in a vehicle, does not violate this right to personal security that the voters of Wisconsin chose to expressly protect in their state constitution.

So he ignored the state constitution in order to impose his anti-gun views on the people of Wisconsin.

After the landmark U.S. Supreme Court Heller case upholding Second Amendment gun rights in 2008, Louis Butler spoke at an Obama for President fundraiser and specifically mentioned "gun control" as an issue that potential Obama appointees would impact.

"Gun control," Butler said, "may ultimately be decided, and the new appointees can tip the very balance of the court. [The] background, personal beliefs and policy decisions of the justices selected will influence how they will vote on the difficult cases before them."

There you have it. He is a radical activist who wants to move the courts -- and our country -- in a new direction. We've already had enough "hope and change" for a lifetime. We don't need another federal judge who will use his radical "personal beliefs" to reshape our society.

ACTION: Please contact your U.S. Senators and urge them to OPPOSE the nomination of Judge Louis Butler as U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Wisconsin. Butler was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, and could now be voted on by the full Senate at any time.

You can use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your senators the pre-written e-mail message below.

----- Pre-written letter -----

Dear Senator:

Please OPPOSE the nomination of Louis Butler as U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Wisconsin.

When Louis Butler first ran for the Wisconsin Supreme Court -- the voters rejected him by a 2-1 margin. When he was appointed to that court by Democrat Governor Jim Doyle and then stood for retention by the voters, they again rejected him. This was the first time a member of the Wisconsin Supreme Court was rejected by the voters in more than 40 years.

More importantly, Louis Butler opposes the rights of gun owners. In State v. Fischer, Judge Butler expressly ignored the right to bear arms provision in the Wisconsin Constitution. And after the landmark U.S. Supreme Court Heller case upholding Second Amendment gun rights in 2008, Louis Butler spoke at an Obama for President fundraiser and specifically mentioned "gun control" as an issue that potential Obama appointees would impact.

"Gun control," Butler said, "may ultimately be decided, and the new appointees can tip the very balance of the court. [The] background, personal beliefs and policy decisions of the justices selected will influence how they will vote on the difficult cases before them."

Again, I urge you to OPPOSE this nomination. Gun Owners of America will be scoring this nomination and will let me know how you vote on this radical judge.

Sincerely,
 
Register to hide this ad
I'd like to help, but my two jerk Senators are so far left of him with their anti gun atttitutes; it's a complete waste of time. They keep introducing anti gun legislation, while their main inner city supporters get out of jail free. Not to mention have all the guns they can carry.
 
I'd like to help, but my two jerk Senators are so far left of him with their anti gun atttitutes; it's a complete waste of time. They keep introducing anti gun legislation, while their main inner city supporters get out of jail free. Not to mention have all the guns they can carry.

Same here. The best I can hope for is my senators miss the vote somehow.
 
I'd like to help, but my two jerk Senators are so far left of him with their anti gun atttitutes; it's a complete waste of time. They keep introducing anti gun legislation, while their main inner city supporters get out of jail free. Not to mention have all the guns they can carry.

Same here. The best I can hope for is my senators miss the vote somehow.

Both of you are missing the boat. Even though it looks hopeless right now, you have to keep letting them know you're out there and that you are not happy with what they're doing. If they never receive a negative comment on what they do, it'll be business as usual forever. We have to hold their feet to the fire and let them know that they are accountable for their misdeeds.

Remind them that you're watching them every chance you get. Tell them they won't be getting your vote in the next election, or any subsequent election when they seek a higher office. Believe me, I know how fruitless this can seem with Chuck Schumer for a Senator.

IT'S TIME FOR THE SILENT MAJORITY TO STOP BEING SILENT!

......moon
 
Both of you are missing the boat. Even though it looks hopeless right now, you have to keep letting them know you're out there and that you are not happy with what they're doing. If they never receive a negative comment on what they do, it'll be business as usual forever. We have to hold their feet to the fire and let them know that they are accountable for their misdeeds.

Remind them that you're watching them every chance you get. Tell them they won't be getting your vote in the next election, or any subsequent election when they seek a higher office. Believe me, I know how fruitless this can seem with Chuck Schumer for a Senator.

IT'S TIME FOR THE SILENT MAJORITY TO STOP BEING SILENT!

......moon

I think you missed my meaning. I'm on both of those butt heads lists for all the negative comments I send them. I'm not in the least silent. If you look at who the two from NJ are you'll understand that there is nothing to get them to consider anything favorable about firearms. They keep putting in new and more onerous anti-gun legislation regularly. They only want their inner city backers to have guns. And while Chucky is bad all around and louder, these two are worse.
 
Back
Top