- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
Is the 2.0 really much different than the 1.0? I notice it does not have the extended FCU and does still uses a roll pin instead of the solid pin. Other than trigger are there other changes
Shield 1 vs 2
- Thread starter Wingman1800
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Two other changes. There are serrations on the front of the slide(presumably for press checking) and the grip has a more aggressive surface.
Wee Hooker
Member
I can tell you that the trigger in the MA compliant version is notably better than it's predecessor. Better triggers (almost )always translate to better accuracy potential . ( Particularly under controlled conditions like at the range.) Utilizing that potential is up to the individual shooter.
martybee
Member
I have looked at all the comparison videos of the Shield 1.0 vs 2.0 and find very little differences between them. I have the 9m 1.0 and it is absolutely sovereign! (at least to me). Mine has over 3,000 rds. through it and nary an issue. Trigger has smoothed out and the piece is quite easy to rack and take down. In my assessment, the changes do not warrant the added expense to change to the 2.0!
Ironically, the better the shooter, the less effect of a "better" trigger on normal shooting. The dedicated "trigger yankers" benefit most from a light, short trigger since their normal technique is to get the sights "just right" and yank the trigger.
A superior shooter may not like a longer, heavier trigger, but he will still hit what he is shooting at.
I shoot revolver competition, and to me the greatest challenge of the shield is its light weight, which requires the trigger to be pressed straight back, so as not to torque the gun sideways.
Nicefish
Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2017
- Messages
- 93
- Reaction score
- 17
Granted, I've only shot the "1.0", but it sounds like the one to get. Dont have a Shield yet, but it's the one I'm leaning towards. For the cost the 2.0 doesn't seem worth it. I have the 2.0 compact, and it's fantastic, except I'd rather not have the grip texturing. It seems that the 2.0 Shield grip texture is the biggest significant difference in the single stacks, therefore not worth it in my opinion. The Performance Center version seems like an answer to a question nobody's asking - porting in a 3"ish conceal purpose barrel? Personally I'd rather have night sights than fiber optics in a ccp also.
Aahzz
Member
I just got a new Shield, so I was in a similar comparison mode. I didn't find the trigger substantially better - slightly, but not enough to make the difference. Also, as I carry IWB, I do not care for the more aggressive texture of the 2.0 since I don't want to wear layers, and it'd irritate the hell out of my side. So, I chose 1.0 and am thrilled with it.
Rastoff
US Veteran
What is an extended FCU?
martybee
Member
Wingman1800:
Welcome From South Central Illinois! And to the best S&W Forum! Stay tuned & in touch. Post Often.
Welcome From South Central Illinois! And to the best S&W Forum! Stay tuned & in touch. Post Often.
I had a 1.0, didn't like the trigger very much, dumped it for a PPS, and then tried the 2.0 and it was love at first squeeze. The PPS is history. Much better trigger and I do shoot better with it (and I wasn't shooting bad with the 1.0) For me it is a better gun, but it really is a personal thing.
My Shield 9m/m 1.0 has about a 5-1/2lb nice trigger which I feel is about perfect for that type of gun, especially if it is carried in the pocket. A lot of shooting might take it down to 5 lbs but I see no need to go lighter than that for a defensive gun. If using it for targets, plinking, and hunting a 4lb trigger might be nice.
Nicefish
Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2017
- Messages
- 93
- Reaction score
- 17
I know what you mean! Had to get a Talon grip on my 2.0 compact, after a few hours of iwb carry it was already making my skin red. I also don't want to carry layered, especially in the the summer.
OP
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
FCU is the Fire Control Unit. Which for example in the Sig P320 is removable and can be move to different grip styles.It is the serialized part of the pistol.
Rastoff
US Veteran
OK, so how does that relate to the Shield? Are you possibly talking about the sear block? That's the block in the rear that contains the sear and sear disconnect lever. It also has the two rear tabs that the slide rides on.
As long as I'm typing, what's extended about it?
Got a pic?
As long as I'm typing, what's extended about it?
Got a pic?
mrmike7189
Member
I did NOT like the 2.0 grip. Too aggressive for my liking. dont need the front serrations(never press check) and the price($293vs. 393).
1.0 for the win!
tlay
US Veteran
Having a 3lb trigger versus a 5lb trigger is not going to make a difference to someone who is not willing to put in the practice to become proficient at firing a handgun.
It takes a lot of dedication and practice to be able to use ANY handgun and hit what you are aiming at! I think too may people are looking for that magic trigger that will take the place of practice and make them a great shooter!!
If you are willing to put in the time and energy then any handgun will do the job! Put your money in ammo and training.
It takes a lot of dedication and practice to be able to use ANY handgun and hit what you are aiming at! I think too may people are looking for that magic trigger that will take the place of practice and make them a great shooter!!
If you are willing to put in the time and energy then any handgun will do the job! Put your money in ammo and training.
Similar threads
