Polyphemus
Member
I note that posted images of 'Fitz specials' usually show Colts. S&Ws, if shortened, are usually cut in front of the ejector rod retention lug.
I gather that this is about the nature of S&W ejector rods. Colts don't seem to require any external support(?) Thus, shortening a Smith to 2" would require a lot of--expensive--skilled pistolsmithing to replant a foresight, shorten the ejector rod, and stick on a lug.
And yet... The 625-10 is built with a Fitz length barrel. The shorter ejector rods etc. must be out there in some parts bin. Could such parts (ground to smooth the frame to barrel lines) be fitted on, say, a battered old 1917?
I'm still considering what to do with my Brazilian beyond basic trigger-job, timing, end-shake correction etc.
Obviously, cutting the trigger guard is not practical on an old Smith. The cylinder stop screw and plunger prevent making a flat surface in front of the trigger. Thus I can defy tradition with a clear conscience while minimizing modification.
Thanks
I gather that this is about the nature of S&W ejector rods. Colts don't seem to require any external support(?) Thus, shortening a Smith to 2" would require a lot of--expensive--skilled pistolsmithing to replant a foresight, shorten the ejector rod, and stick on a lug.
And yet... The 625-10 is built with a Fitz length barrel. The shorter ejector rods etc. must be out there in some parts bin. Could such parts (ground to smooth the frame to barrel lines) be fitted on, say, a battered old 1917?
I'm still considering what to do with my Brazilian beyond basic trigger-job, timing, end-shake correction etc.
Obviously, cutting the trigger guard is not practical on an old Smith. The cylinder stop screw and plunger prevent making a flat surface in front of the trigger. Thus I can defy tradition with a clear conscience while minimizing modification.
Thanks
