Should there be more basic info provided to post handgun value requests? I think so and I think some others may agree…
We've all seen the many requests for value assessments. Often they seem to make up 1/4 to 1/3 of the threads in the "1961 to 1980" section. The requests are often made by newbies with little or no experience in the handgun buying/selling/trading world.
Often they make a request providing very little information. Because there is so little information they receive replies that are, because of such lacking detail, equally simplistic and commonly in very general and useless terms. In fact, to diminish the thread further, we often see replies from people with no qualifications to assess the value of a handgun other than the ability to type on a keyboard and make a post...
This is the website to go to on the net for info on S&W handguns. Both the posts and the responses here can clearly determine the credibility of this site as the definitive resource for all people seeking facts and opinions. I believe both the value posts/value reply responses often seen here could be damaging to the credibility of this site.
A workable solution would be to establish and require a minimal list of handgun descriptive info that could provide a much better and more accurate appraisal opportunity. That appraisal would certainly be more accurate and beneficial to the OP as well as other owners/buyers and curious members of this board.
I believe a minimal descriptive list should be required to post value requests and include the following basic items:
1. A picture (preferably several)
2. Model number
3. Dash number (or lack)
4. Barrel length
5. Finish
6. Original box or presentation case?
7. Original tools, grips and paper work?
8. Posters estimate of overall condition
9. Area where firearm is located
10. If applicable, the price being requested by seller
I believe each and every item listed above must be factored into a final value assessment or the "estimate" is essentially useless, not only to the OP but all other interested readers…. When we would see a post lacking much of the points above we could direct the poster to the rules requiring a more useful request….
Anyone else feel the same way?
JMHO……
We've all seen the many requests for value assessments. Often they seem to make up 1/4 to 1/3 of the threads in the "1961 to 1980" section. The requests are often made by newbies with little or no experience in the handgun buying/selling/trading world.
Often they make a request providing very little information. Because there is so little information they receive replies that are, because of such lacking detail, equally simplistic and commonly in very general and useless terms. In fact, to diminish the thread further, we often see replies from people with no qualifications to assess the value of a handgun other than the ability to type on a keyboard and make a post...
This is the website to go to on the net for info on S&W handguns. Both the posts and the responses here can clearly determine the credibility of this site as the definitive resource for all people seeking facts and opinions. I believe both the value posts/value reply responses often seen here could be damaging to the credibility of this site.
A workable solution would be to establish and require a minimal list of handgun descriptive info that could provide a much better and more accurate appraisal opportunity. That appraisal would certainly be more accurate and beneficial to the OP as well as other owners/buyers and curious members of this board.
I believe a minimal descriptive list should be required to post value requests and include the following basic items:
1. A picture (preferably several)
2. Model number
3. Dash number (or lack)
4. Barrel length
5. Finish
6. Original box or presentation case?
7. Original tools, grips and paper work?
8. Posters estimate of overall condition
9. Area where firearm is located
10. If applicable, the price being requested by seller
I believe each and every item listed above must be factored into a final value assessment or the "estimate" is essentially useless, not only to the OP but all other interested readers…. When we would see a post lacking much of the points above we could direct the poster to the rules requiring a more useful request….
Anyone else feel the same way?
JMHO……