Let's say the SHTF; enormous civil unrest, martial law, looting, invasion, massive earthquake, EMF explosion or sun spots; whatever. You grab your bugout bag, your wife and/or dog, those rations and water you've stored, and head for the hills.
Oh yeah, you only have time and room for ONE longarm for protection, hunting, and urban warfare. Whatcha gonna grab?
Here are some popular choices:
Tricked out M4 carbine:
Mikhail Kalashnikov's baby:
The virtually indestructible Nylon 66:
That Model 70 Winchester - reach out and touch someone!
The pride of the Israelis - the Galil:
That M6 survival weapon - good enough for the USAF:
The full-size AR-15:
An M1 carbine?
Georgie Patton's favorite - the M1 Garand:
A precision Winchester Model 75 sporter .22:
A "tactical" Ruger 10/22:
The brute force and reliability of a Remington 870:
Old reliable - the M14:
A Model 92 in .44 or .357 - good enough for Duke:
A Model 1891/30 PU? Top sniper weapon of the Red Army:
Or how about the American counterpart - the 1903A4:
How about a hi-cap 9mm? The Sterling might work:
There's always the old reliable thutty-thutty:
If scaring your opponents makes sense, this one might do:
Or maybe a more modern SMG would do the trick:
The AR-7 was made for a survival scenario:
John Browning's takedown .22 is easy to pack:
A lot of folks have one or more of the SKS rifles:
There's always the free world's right arm - the FAL:
You know, I've seen EACH ONE of these guns lauded in print as the ideal survival long arm? I'm not taking sides here, so I'll ask you - if limited to only one of any of the above (or something else I haven't covered here), which would you choose and why?
Some criteria:
Weight
Ammo
Reliability
Maintenance
Accuracy
Practicality
Intimidation factor
Size
So? Which one, my learned brothers and sisters?
John
Oh yeah, you only have time and room for ONE longarm for protection, hunting, and urban warfare. Whatcha gonna grab?
Here are some popular choices:
Tricked out M4 carbine:

Mikhail Kalashnikov's baby:

The virtually indestructible Nylon 66:

That Model 70 Winchester - reach out and touch someone!

The pride of the Israelis - the Galil:

That M6 survival weapon - good enough for the USAF:

The full-size AR-15:

An M1 carbine?

Georgie Patton's favorite - the M1 Garand:

A precision Winchester Model 75 sporter .22:

A "tactical" Ruger 10/22:

The brute force and reliability of a Remington 870:

Old reliable - the M14:

A Model 92 in .44 or .357 - good enough for Duke:

A Model 1891/30 PU? Top sniper weapon of the Red Army:

Or how about the American counterpart - the 1903A4:

How about a hi-cap 9mm? The Sterling might work:

There's always the old reliable thutty-thutty:

If scaring your opponents makes sense, this one might do:

Or maybe a more modern SMG would do the trick:

The AR-7 was made for a survival scenario:

John Browning's takedown .22 is easy to pack:

A lot of folks have one or more of the SKS rifles:

There's always the free world's right arm - the FAL:

You know, I've seen EACH ONE of these guns lauded in print as the ideal survival long arm? I'm not taking sides here, so I'll ask you - if limited to only one of any of the above (or something else I haven't covered here), which would you choose and why?
Some criteria:
Weight
Ammo
Reliability
Maintenance
Accuracy
Practicality
Intimidation factor
Size
So? Which one, my learned brothers and sisters?
John
Last edited: