SIG P320 Discharges?

The only factual evidence to date is the P320 fires only with trigger pull. Inserting screws into the action and partially pulling the trigger with your finger and twisting the slide to make it “fire” are not proof.
If that is SIG’s response in the face of video evidence showing P320s firing untouched in the holster, every police chief in the country with P320s on the street should dump the weapon as fast as possible, and exclude SIG Sauer in perpetuity from consideration for any future contract. I say that as a longtime SIG fan, owner of twelve SIG pistols, but thankfully no P320s.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0296.webp
    IMG_0296.webp
    26.6 KB · Views: 0
Is this a S&W forum?
This thread is in the "Firearms & Knives: Other Brands & General Topics" subforum, which means non-S&W stuff. The thread title is "Sig P320 Discharges," and has remained on-topic. This is probably the biggest topic in all of the firearms world right now, and the debate over this pistol is at its peak right at this moment, with new information about it appearing weekly. If this topic doesn't interest you, then why did you scroll through and read it?
 
They are still around. The last new M9s were delivered to DOD in 2021, four years safter the M17/18 contract in 2017. When the M18 was paused by the USAF last week, there was an E-6 armed with an M9 on the local base. So, some are still around, and some are still qualified to carry them. But it is unusual and not an option most places for most troops.
My last fleet unit (USMC infantry) still had nothing else but M9s when I left. Only M18s I had seen at that point were with PMO and gate sentries. But our armorers had long since stopped repairing M9s, and if one became unserviceable, it was sent off and not replaced. I expect there are still many M9s in Marine Corps holsters but I don’t think it would be quick or easy to return to it for general issue, simply because the maintenance tail has been allowed to die off by attrition.
 
My last fleet unit (USMC infantry) still had nothing else but M9s when I left. Only M18s I had seen at that point were with PMO and gate sentries. But our armorers had long since stopped repairing M9s, and if one became unserviceable, it was sent off and not replaced. I expect there are still many M9s in Marine Corps holsters but I don’t think it would be quick or easy to return to it for general issue, simply because the maintenance tail has been allowed to die off by attrition.
The M9's will probably go the way of the M1911A1's. For the Corps and the Navy, they will end up at Naval Weapons Station Crane, Ind. There they will be repaired as needed or destroyed as needed. The repaired pistols will probably go to "Deep Storage/War Stores". At some point they may end up at CMP for sale as the M1911A1's are now. Watched this evolution happen to the M1911A1's, when I was in the Corps.
 
I do not know if this has been posted? Not gonna wade through 25 pages. I also have not watched the video either. I do not care. My Sigs are old school hammer fired DA/SA,:)

 
Pretty expensive paperweight if nothing is settled!
I just want a safe pistol not just my use but for those that could be near me!
Just saw that IDPA organization is suspending/banning the use of P320’s in competition events! Which other’s will follow suit, dominos are starting to fall. Sig has only themselves to blame for the bad PR!
Should have come out with another modification for the FCU for an easy upgrade and they don’t need to admit fault. Just a potentially a better mechanism to address the issue and concerns of owners and all who use the P320.
Could an owner be held libel for an injury from an uncommanded discharge with all that is now happening? If there is a lawyer out there, give us an idea of this possibility, thank you!
P320 is locked in my safe and continue to use the M&P Shield 45 as my CCW (easiest 45 acp to shoot in such a small package).
What a MESS for everyone!
 
My last fleet unit (USMC infantry) still had nothing else but M9s when I left. Only M18s I had seen at that point were with PMO and gate sentries. But our armorers had long since stopped repairing M9s, and if one became unserviceable, it was sent off and not replaced. I expect there are still many M9s in Marine Corps holsters but I don’t think it would be quick or easy to return to it for general issue, simply because the maintenance tail has been allowed to die off by attrition.
My son seperated in early 2024, his Fleet infantry bn had all M18s by that point. I asked him what everyone thought of them and he told me that they were only drawn out for mandatory quals. Said the older Marines despised it. He told me that the only time he saw the M18 in use was in the holster of MPs. Yeah I know this hearsay.
 
Yeah it’s Glock’s fault you were never taught proper gun handling protocols. My uncle taught me to keep my finger out of the trigger guard way back in the 70s. All my friends dads taught the same thing. The USMC beat it into my brain in 87.
My comment is about time frames and the fact that the trigger guard safety issue is mandatory today, universal and unrelenting. It is a great idea especially given the millions of folks who bought these striker fire paddle safety guns. I hunted everyday when I was a kid in the 50-60s. All of us always walked at the ready with finger in the trigger guard. When I was drafted in 1965 the Army never mentioned anything about trigger guards. The USMC may have because they live and breath weapons care and use, but the Army never did. In VN '66-67 nobody I knew ever mentioned it either. I'm sure there are thousands of folks who were taught trigger safety (great idea) throughout history, my point is that today and for the last 20 years it is gospel.
 
The only factual evidence to date is the P320 fires only with trigger pull. Inserting screws into the action and partially pulling the trigger with your finger and twisting the slide to make it “fire” are not proof.
If it is indeed true that "the P320 fires only with trigger pull," then why has it been firing while completely contained inside holsters with no hands on the gun? If you're going to say that the holster itself is pulling the trigger, then why have these holsters decided they only want to pull P320 triggers exclusively? If the argument is that in each of these cases, some obstruction got inside the holster and pulled the trigger, then why hasn't the same thing been happening with any other striker handgun besides the P320? Why was the P320 designed in such a way that it can fire so easily by something barely touching the trigger? Why are these cases only happening with the P320 and not other striker fired pistols? Don't you think these are fair questions to ask in light of the evidence?

The screw thing was merely demonstrating that the trigger only has to move a tiny amount - less than 1mm to both deactivate the striker block safety and put the gun into a dangerous condition. Isn't that cause for concern, considering the pistol is designed for duty use, carried in a holster, where someone is going to be moving around, possibly running, etc? The slide twisting part of the demonstration is illustrating two things - one, sloppy fit which changes the amount of sear engagement as the slide moves up and down against FCU rails, and two, that it approximates what happens in the real world when you move around and the holster is applying varying pressure against the slide. Plus, in several instances of that video, the gun fired from merely touching the slide or simply sliding it into a holster, not "twisting" it. The screw showed that all of this can happen after the trigger is pressed less than THIRTY THOUSANDTHS OF AN INCH!
 
Last edited:
If it is indeed true that "the P320 fires only with trigger pull," then why has it been firing while completely contained inside holsters with no hands on the gun? If you're going to say that the holster itself is pulling the trigger, then why have these holsters decided they only want to pull P320 triggers exclusively? If the argument is that in each of these cases, some obstruction got inside the holster and pulled the trigger, then why hasn't the same thing been happening with any other striker handgun besides the P320? Why was the P320 designed in such a way that it can fire so easily by something barely touching the trigger? Why are these cases only happening with the P320 and not other striker fired pistols? Don't you think these are fair questions to ask in light of the evidence?

The screw thing was merely demonstrating that the trigger only has to move a tiny amount - less than 1mm to both deactivate the striker block safety and put the gun into a dangerous condition. Isn't that cause for concern, considering the pistol is designed for duty use, carried in a holster, where someone is going to be moving around, possibly running, etc? The slide twisting part of the demonstration is illustrating two things - one, sloppy fit which changes the amount of sear engagement as the slide moves up and down against FCU rails, and two, that it approximates what happens in the real world when you move around and the holster is applying varying pressure against the slide.
Anyone with 3 functioning brain cells could understand that the screw was used merely to remove the possibility of the demonstrator from inadvertently applying the pressure to fully depress the trigger as he wiggled the slide. The gentleman that used the CNC setup did the same thing, a CNC is capable of moving .0001” (maybe less now) at a time manually.

My question now is, why does Sig seem to solely be the brand that unsafe gun handlers are exclusively using.
 
My son seperated in early 2024, his Fleet infantry bn had all M18s by that point. I asked him what everyone thought of them and he told me that they were only drawn out for mandatory quals. Said the older Marines despised it. He told me that the only time he saw the M18 in use was in the holster of MPs. Yeah I know this hearsay.
One oddity in infantry battalions was that the Marine Corps years ago changed the table of equipment and reduced the pistol allocation down to almost nothing. The two E-9s and the medical officers were the only ones left who actually rated a pistol. Even the battalion commander only rated an M4. We were allowed to keep our M9s on the basis that if they broke, we lost them one at a time. Without the rack full of orphaned M9s, the battalion didn’t even rate enough pistols to arm watch standers or conduct mandatory pistol qual ranges. From what you describe it sounds like the battalions, at least in his Division, have surrendered their M9s and now have to borrow a van full of M18s from the Division armory to conduct a pistol range. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Officer of the Day is lugging around an M4 now if that is the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AJ
Since the trial of the Sig P320 has already been held in the court of public opinion and online misinformation it doesn't appear that "truth" has anything to do with this. Most alleged nd's are in Police Departments where officers cannot admit they handled a weapon incorrectly causing it to go off without losing their job. They have to lie to protect their income and standing on the force. No one is going to work with another officer that had a "nd". I think what we are seeing is budget cuts causing training deficits. Poor training is probably more at fault here than the Sig P320. Once an officer has an nd, whether proven to be the firearms fault or not, the department is obligated to show they took action due to the officers claim. They either admit the officer messed up, fire him and hope it doesn't happen again, or they blame the gun. Replacing the P320 is easier than accepting responsibility for improper firearms training and poor hiring practices.

Now officers have a tough job as we all know. They have to go 0-60 mentally a few dozen times a day. It's easy to get sloppy doing something they do day in and day out. If departments really thought it was the firearm how difficult would it be to have officers not chamber a round till necessary. When departments were using the Beretta 92FS the long single action trigger pull didn't get anyone killed as far as I know. Chambering a round would not take any longer than the 92 take up. Most foreign countries don't carry hot.

I'm not a Sig fan boy and have firearms from almost every manufacturer. I do have several P320s and have never slammed one down on a table, round chambered with the barrel pointed at my chest. If that's not covered in firearms training there is a much bigger problem!
 
One oddity in infantry battalions was that the Marine Corps years ago changed the table of equipment and reduced the pistol allocation down to almost nothing. The two E-9s and the medical officers were the only ones left who actually rated a pistol. Even the battalion commander only rated an M4. We were allowed to keep our M9s on the basis that if they broke, we lost them one at a time. Without the rack full of orphaned M9s, the battalion didn’t even rate enough pistols to arm watch standers or conduct mandatory pistol qual ranges. From what you describe it sounds like the battalions, at least in his Division, have surrendered their M9s and now have to borrow a van full of M18s from the Division armory to conduct a pistol range. I wouldn’t be surprised if the Officer of the Day is lugging around an M4 now if that is the case.
Maybe that is a good thing with the M18 being so iffy,
 
Since the trial of the Sig P320 has already been held in the court of public opinion and online misinformation it doesn't appear that "truth" has anything to do with this. Most alleged nd's are in Police Departments where officers cannot admit they handled a weapon incorrectly causing it to go off without losing their job. They have to lie to protect their income and standing on the force. No one is going to work with another officer that had a "nd". I think what we are seeing is budget cuts causing training deficits. Poor training is probably more at fault here than the Sig P320. Once an officer has an nd, whether proven to be the firearms fault or not, the department is obligated to show they took action due to the officers claim. They either admit the officer messed up, fire him and hope it doesn't happen again, or they blame the gun. Replacing the P320 is easier than accepting responsibility for improper firearms training and poor hiring practices.

Now officers have a tough job as we all know. They have to go 0-60 mentally a few dozen times a day. It's easy to get sloppy doing something they do day in and day out. If departments really thought it was the firearm how difficult would it be to have officers not chamber a round till necessary. When departments were using the Beretta 92FS the long single action trigger pull didn't get anyone killed as far as I know. Chambering a round would not take any longer than the 92 take up. Most foreign countries don't carry hot.

I'm not a Sig fan boy and have firearms from almost every manufacturer. I do have several P320s and have never slammed one down on a table, round chambered with the barrel pointed at my chest. If that's not covered in firearms training there is a much bigger problem!
A member for 12 years with 6 posts? And you choose to post ignoring all video evidence available on the +/- 120 incidents now known with this one particular handgun.
 
Maybe that is a good thing with the M18 being so iffy,
For the low threat environment of most military pistol carry (if the threat is not low, they will pull out M4s every time), condition 3 carry is not a bad option, and will allow the armed forces to ride out the P320 fiasco while awaiting some technical modification to their pistols. There aren’t many public statements coming from the military, and I have no inside perspective anymore, but it would surprise me if commanders all the way down to the O5 level aren’t quietly directing condition 3 carry until this plays out.
 
Since the trial of the Sig P320 has already been held in the court of public opinion and online misinformation it doesn't appear that "truth" has anything to do with this. Most alleged nd's are in Police Departments where officers cannot admit they handled a weapon incorrectly causing it to go off without losing their job. They have to lie to protect their income and standing on the force. No one is going to work with another officer that had a "nd". I think what we are seeing is budget cuts causing training deficits. Poor training is probably more at fault here than the Sig P320. Once an officer has an nd, whether proven to be the firearms fault or not, the department is obligated to show they took action due to the officers claim. They either admit the officer messed up, fire him and hope it doesn't happen again, or they blame the gun. Replacing the P320 is easier than accepting responsibility for improper firearms training and poor hiring practices.

Now officers have a tough job as we all know. They have to go 0-60 mentally a few dozen times a day. It's easy to get sloppy doing something they do day in and day out. If departments really thought it was the firearm how difficult would it be to have officers not chamber a round till necessary. When departments were using the Beretta 92FS the long single action trigger pull didn't get anyone killed as far as I know. Chambering a round would not take any longer than the 92 take up. Most foreign countries don't carry hot.

I'm not a Sig fan boy and have firearms from almost every manufacturer. I do have several P320s and have never slammed one down on a table, round chambered with the barrel pointed at my chest. If that's not covered in firearms training there is a much bigger problem!
Wow. No assumptions or misinformation here...............
 
Anyone with 3 functioning brain cells could understand that the screw was used merely to remove the possibility of the demonstrator from inadvertently applying the pressure to fully depress the trigger as he wiggled the slide. The gentleman that used the CNC setup did the same thing, a CNC is capable of moving .0001” (maybe less now) at a time manually.

My question now is, why does Sig seem to solely be the brand that unsafe gun handlers are exclusively using.
Typical derogatory comment. I don’t know how rational, logical, thinking human beings can internalize opinions and pseudo-scientific drivel and accept it as fact. The FBI recanted on their testing and no one to date has replicated or demonstrated the “how” of the “uncommanded discharge”.

Is the trigger too wide, is the trigger guard too thin, are there other mechanical issues - we don’t know. Are the users at fault, again, we don’t know, we weren’t there. The Air Force death - was he and others directed to not use the manual safety - we don’t know. I have an M17, two P320-M17s, one X-Full and two X-Carry. If they are proven dangerous I will trash them.
 
Back
Top