Sightmark/Eotech vs. Primary Arms/Aimpoint comparison?

[JaPes]

I'd love to have an EoTech, but other guns get in the way. I also want a Trijicon ACOG. Oh well, back on topic.

The cool thing about the EoTech is that the dot it projects is actually 1/3 MOA. The 1/3 MOA dot is diffraction limited by the human eye & appears to be 1 MOA. This is why when you mount a 3X Magnifier behind an EoTech, you still perceive the dot to be 1MOA.

 

[Foxtrot]

The Trijicon is a nice sight.

 

[Sabby]

very nice write up foxtrot



eotech would have been my choice if I decided for a light weight CQC, made in america, shoot and scoot

I my self, between the two... aimpoint and eotech
choose the aimpoint for durability and battery life,but it was the right choice for what needs I think will be used for..

both have plus & minus... but durability won

also .. note in engagement
Most people are not use to getting into ..the eye dialates and more than likely to let more light to hit the macula, which is the most light-sensitive part of the retina

back to the orig. poster Bill
bottom line is, if you got a Sightmark - Tasco - Barska - NcStar - Leapers - AIM - Primary or Vortex or thinking about it you'll wish you got something better for you AR platforum