I have always used single stage presses, of which I have two set up on the bench. Most of my reloading is handgun ammunition. I like to set up one press for one operation (sizing, etc), then run 500 rounds through that stage. Then on to the next stage. I seat primers with a handheld priming tool (adjustable and very consistent). Crimping is done as a separate operation, rather than crimping during the bullet seating stage (much more uniform results). I have a dozen loading blocks to use while charging from the powder measure.
Usually work in sessions of about one to two hours at a time over the course of several days. Overall, I average about 4 to 5 hours to load 500 rounds of .38, 9mm, .44, .45, etc.
Rifle ammunition I do the same basic way, but working in 100-round lots. A bit more time consuming because I decap, then resize, then expand (using the Lyman M-dies, very good results), prime, charge, seat and then crimp (if necessary). Other than .30-06 for my M1 rifles (for which I load large lots when I need them) most of my hunting rifles are seldom fired more than 40 or 50 rounds per year, so a 100-round batch keeps them going for a long time.
Nothing against the progressive loading machines (if they'd been around when I started reloading 42 years ago I would probably have scrimped and saved to buy one). This is just the method that I worked out many years ago and never found any strong reason to change.