Size does matter, S&W #908 compared to others

ColbyBruce

Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
8,259
Reaction score
12,630
Location
Atlanta, GA
Walther PP .32 a.c.p. and the S&W #908 9mm.
DSCN27201.JPG

Walther PP .32 a.c.p.; Beretta #84 .380 a.c.p.; S&W #908 9mm.
DSCN2718.JPG

S&W #908, Walther PP, Beretta #84.
DSCN2724.JPG

Rossi #68 on a Walther PP and a Beretta #84 on a S&W #908.
DSCN2725.JPG
 
Register to hide this ad
Great comparison shots. Goes to show that the 3913/908 packs a better punch than many other small guns in a similar sized package.

I can even get away with pocket carrying my 3913 in pants that have large front pockets, like my Woolrich Elite or 5.11 pants. It prints a bit more than my 642, though, due to the blockier shape.

I'm convinced that the 3913/908 series are hands down the best summer carry guns. Small enough for easy concealment in shorts and a t-shirt, but just large enough to allow you to easily get a full firing grip on the gun.
 
"The bore axis certainly looks higher when the back view is compaired to the other two"

I believe it appears that way because I had to balance the pistols on the edge of a book,
Maureen McCormick's Here's the Story that my daughter was reading. I think all three handguns were trying to get away, LOL.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top