Snarky Responses

There is a lot of common sense on this forum. I had asked the question about the 27 and 29. Not surprised with some responses. Expected I guess. I should have posted directly to some of you guys. Thanks for the time and consideration. I will not hesitate to ask legitimate questions.
 
This thread has been a hoot. Differing opinions and sensitivities for sure. Kinda like life, eh? I have a pretty thick skin and it takes a lot to offend me. No, that's not a challenge, folks!

I do find some posters to be generally tiresome, though. Snarky comments, unfunny quips, what have you. At best, they don't contribute anything of value to the thread - a waste of bandwidth to use an old phrase. At worst, they manage to derail a thread or aggravate people and send it into the weeds. So, it happens.

My way of dealing with it is the Ignore feature. That squelches most of the noise I don't want to listen to. Periodically, when I see a member's post is hidden, I'll log out and view the post as a non-member. Usually that hidden post turns out to be as expected. I didn't miss anything, my assessment of the poster still holds and I go back to ignoring them. Easy peasy!

Call me arrogant if you like. It won't hurt my feelings and you may be little bit right!
 
There is a lot of common sense on this forum. I had asked the question about the 27 and 29. Not surprised with some responses. Expected I guess. I should have posted directly to some of you guys. Thanks for the time and consideration. I will not hesitate to ask legitimate questions.

Keep on asking, Horseapple! Your question about the 27 and 29 was completely legitimate. The great thing about this forum is we can all learn from each other and make some friends along the way. Stay with us!
 
There is a lot of common sense on this forum. I had asked the question about the 27 and 29. Not surprised with some responses. Expected I guess. I should have posted directly to some of you guys. Thanks for the time and consideration. I will not hesitate to ask legitimate questions.
1st. I am not being snarky
2nd. To quote you " I was not aware revolvers were caliber specific" On another thread you mentioned that you had a Model 19, which by the way, shoots .38 spl & .357 mag. What other calibers did you shoot in it? You suppose a 22lr might be a little small?
3rd. I could really confuse you, I have a revolver that shoots .32 S&W, .32 H&R mag. and .327 Fed Mag. But it sure doesn't shoot .357 mag!
 
Last edited:
But that's actually a very useful reply. I could spend 20 - 30 minutes using google myself and pasting links and expanding upon the link, but the op could do the same thing and maybe just ain't thought of it. I look on it as the "Teach a man to fish and he won't ask questions that may elicit snarky replies . . . "

I too fall on this side of the fence. If someone asks a question on this board that a 5 second Google search could answer, they need to know that.

And yeah, I posted a smarta**ed comment on the "27, 29" thread because of the thought above.

But when someone comes in here wanting information above and beyond a simple search, I believe I've always been polite and accommodating; it's the same treatment I was given when I came in here 8-9 years ago. And sure, I asked some (in retrospect) dumb questions and will probably continue to do so. Snarky answers don't bother me, it's the Internet not charm school.
 
You want to see snark ? Just try being a resident of California and wait for all the replies that are of absolutely no benefit to the conversation or topic at hand.
I guess some people think they need some typing practice.

Yep. Every time see a thread started about California I put my egg timer on to see how quickly someone says: "you need to move".
 
Snark will reap its own reward. We know a little bit about Karma.
As far as " googling" something, yeah I've done it but I'm trying to wean myself off of google and the like. Besides, it's kind of sterile, you know?
Asking here is like sitting around with friends sometimes and if a friend asks me a question, I won't tell him/her to google it.
It's just simple human communication. Not a bad thing.
 
I used to be bad about this but it was not always meant to be snarky. I used to do it because people are poor listeners and a short to the point direct answer got peoples attention. And it didn't help the group I used to hang with though it was hilarious.
But then after awhile I and they got tired of it.
I asked WWJD and I learned that sometimes the loudest response is no response at all.
 
Yep. Every time see a thread started about California I put my egg timer on to see how quickly someone says: "you need to move".

Then watch what happens when they do move. I know in most of CO it never gets a warm reception these days. Also applies to those from Texas. Can't win either way.
 
Stan Laurel told his friends "If any of you cry at my funeral I'll never speak to you again !"
My experience with people who are snarky and sarcastic and ill mannered is they can dish it out, but they can't take it.
 
Then watch what happens when they do move. I know in most of CO it never gets a warm reception these days. Also applies to those from Texas. Can't win either way.

That could be that the people in CO and Texas assume that the new residents from California are going to bring the bad things about California with them instead of realizing that those new residents wanted to escape all those bad things and live with more like minded people.

Pretty bigoted and prejudiced of those residents I'd say.
 
Not piling on

It's been eluded to here but "not being snarky" is the start and continuing in the same spirit is "not piling on" or peeing in another's direction even if you feel they've aimed a stream at you.

Recently a forum member quoted me in a reply and essentially accused me of spreading "bad information" which I was pretty sure I did not do.

I wrote a private message to him defending myself. Previewed the message and deleted it. Not responding made me feel like their was hope I might be an adult someday. Good decision to just let it be.
 
That could be that the people in CO and Texas assume that the new residents from California are going to bring the bad things about California with them instead of realizing that those new residents wanted to escape all those bad things and live with more like minded people.

Pretty bigoted and prejudiced of those residents I'd say.

This is actually kinda interesting. As a member of the Texas Ag Council we heard an excellent presentation referencing the 17K Californians that move to Texas every month. Turns out their move motivation is all-important with respect to how they may behave at the polling place.

A very well-informed political consultant presenting to us said if residents from California, New York, Illinois, New Jersey move to Texas because they are yearning for some business freedom they feel they no longer have, escaping regulatory burdens, they are very likely to reinforce Texas' Red State status.

If, on the other hand, they move because their company relocated to Texas for a more favorable corporate tax environment, so if they wanna keep their job they must also move. These folks are causing some concern with respect to bringing their left-leaning politics with them.

No one seems to know yet if one group outnumbers the other.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top