Somtimes I feel that the 15-22 gets a bad rap because it's polymer...

kilo6echo

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
It seems like when I see folks comparing the 15-22 to another .22 tactical rifle platform, I hear a lot of, "It's all plastic and light", or "It feels like a toy".

To me I like the light weight design. I like having kick on a .22 rifle, for me it is part of the fun. People also forget that there are are several well made polymer based handguns out there too.
 
Register to hide this ad
Last week, we went shooting up in the mountains with some friends - my M&P15-22 and 22A, the friends had 4 "real" AR's (a SMW M&P15, Rock River Arms, DPMS, and Bushmaster), GSG, Glock 19 & 26, Springfield XD45, two Ruger 10-22's, SKS, and a Remington 870 ... yes, enough to take over some smaller countries ... anyways ...

Everyone wanted to shoot it. I lost count of how much ammo we went through, at least 500 rds. Not a single complaint about feeling "too light" or "like a toy", as a matter of fact, quite the opposite.Everyone was talking about my gun, and wanted to shoot it. One guy asked a lot of questions about buying one.
 
When i was looking at which to buy I took issue with the polymer also. After researching the Ruger and the Colt along with the 15-22 it was no question which one to get. One of my favorite handguns is the glock 21 so I got over the polymer. I carried the M16 in the Corps and having added optics and accessorifying the 15-22 is still lighter. I have taken this bad boy rabbit hunting in the New Mexico desert and it was never uncomfortable to carry.
 
Many have been giving Glock a 'bad rap' since day one. And those who do will likely continue to do so. Meanwhile, the market has spoken.

I consider the light weight of the 15-22 a plus. As well, the polymer finish has stayed in perfect shape after a great deal of use and abuse. The metal quad rail on my Sig522 already has slight nicks and mars from accessories.
 
Anyone who has seen and held and shot my gun at the range has never commented on the polymer being an issue, All of them just loved the gun. Tons of questions and attention while shooting and to be honest id rather be left alone at the range so i can shoot in peace.

Ive actually heard more complaints about the pot metal used in the Colt/Umerex which i personally have no issue with either.

My only issue with polymer is what will it be like in 60 years when it possibly gets old and brittle? Hopefully we will see what first Gen Glocks are like before our rifles start cracking and breaking.
 
The Colt/Umarex .22's ARE NOT comprised of ''pot metal''. The upper and lower receivers are cast ALUMINUM, CNC machined. The innards are NOT ''pot metal'', they are a zinc alloy, very hard and extremely wear resistant. The bolt is steel faced and trouble free. Most folks running these arms down don't own one. They are actually a very good rifle. I can run 500 rounds thru mine at a time, NO ISSUES. The big complaint has been the 180 degree safety. I mean really- get over it. If you think I'm anti-polymer I have a 15-22 pistol en route from Bud's. Due here tommorow on UPS. I'm almost 60, I won't be around long enough to find out if the polymers will become brittle...LOL I know this Smith pistol is going to be fun!!!:D
 
I was torn between the SR22 and and the 15-22, but decided on the S&W for the price and the light weight. Someone made a very good point that once you start to accessorize, the weight savings will be quite noticeable.
 
The Colt/Umarex .22's ARE NOT comprised of ''pot metal''. The upper and lower receivers are cast ALUMINUM, CNC machined. The innards are NOT ''pot metal'', they are a zinc alloy, very hard and extremely wear resistant. The bolt is steel faced and trouble free. Most folks running these arms down don't own one. They are actually a very good rifle. I can run 500 rounds thru mine at a time, NO ISSUES. The big complaint has been the 180 degree safety. I mean really- get over it. If you think I'm anti-polymer I have a 15-22 pistol en route from Bud's. Due here tommorow on UPS. I'm almost 60, I won't be around long enough to find out if the polymers will become brittle...LOL I know this Smith pistol is going to be fun!!!:D

CNC machined aluminum body.. HAH

More like... Airsoft Aluminum M4 bodies, with custom fitted pot metal innards..

Feel free to take your M4 apart and photo the body, and I will show you photos of my $75.00 aluminum airsoft M4 body and we can compare.

Nothing CNC machined about it.. And I call a spade a spade, it's zinc pot metal guts.. Hey that's not the end of the world, so are the innards of my GSG 5PK. But I bought the S&W because it felt like a better built AR than the Colt M4.
 
CNC machined aluminum body.. HAH

More like... Airsoft Aluminum M4 bodies, with custom fitted pot metal innards..

Feel free to take your M4 apart and photo the body, and I will show you photos of my $75.00 aluminum airsoft M4 body and we can compare.

Nothing CNC machined about it.. And I call a spade a spade, it's zinc pot metal guts.. Hey that's not the end of the world, so are the innards of my GSG 5PK. But I bought the S&W because it felt like a better built AR than the Colt M4.


Well put. Another factor when I was deciding was the tear down. Twist the barrel to loosen and don't remove any of the innards? I like the Smiths similarity to its Bigger AR cousins.
 
I'm not parroting anyone.. I've had the Colt M4 IN MY HANDS...

My observations are my own, based on handling and breaking down the M4 Ops.

I chose the S&W because to me, it felt like a better made rifle, using better made parts. That's my perception from studying the guts of both.. The M4 Ops looks the part, but it doesn't work like an AR and I would be willing to bet that if you stripped the guts out of your Ops and compared it's "shell" to my airsoft shell, you would be enlightened.

I am fully willing to document with high res photos and a dial caliper all sorts of measurements, wanna compare and if I'm wrong, I'll gladly say I'm wrong.
 
There's nothing to play out... If he is happy with his Colt M4 that's all that matters. I compared both and I made the right decision for me.

There are lots of happy Colt M4 guys out there.

I'm just saying call a spade a spade. The internals are pot metal, that's not up for debate, that's what they are. Good, bad or indifferent.
 
they are a zinc alloy, very hard and extremely wear resistant.

As a metallurgist, I can guarantee you that no such thing exists.

Zinc alloy = pot metal

Maybe they are using a higher grade of pot metal, but if it's zinc, it's still pot metal.
 
I have heard the term 'pot metal' used many times over the years but really never understood exactly what it means. In simple terms, what does it mean?
 
I have heard the term 'pot metal' used many times over the years but really never understood exactly what it means. In simple terms, what does it mean?


Pot metal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit
Jump to: navigation, search

Pot metal is a slang term that refers to alloys that consist of inexpensive, low-melting point metals used to make fast, inexpensive castings. There is no scientific metallurgical standard for pot metal; common metals in pot metal include zinc, lead, copper, tin, magnesium, aluminium, iron, and cadmium. The primary advantage of pot metal is that it is quick and easy to cast. Due to its low melting temperature no sophisticated foundry equipment is needed and specialized molds are not necessary. It is sometimes used to experiment with molds and ideas before using metals of higher quality. It is sometime referred to as white metal, die-cast zinc, or monkey metal.[1] Examples of items created from pot metal include toys, furniture fittings, tool parts, electronics components, and automotive parts.[citation needed]

Pot metal can be prone to instability over time, as it has a tendency to bend, distort, crack, shatter, and pit with age.[1] The low boiling point of zinc and the fast cooling of the newly-cast part often allow air bubbles to remain within the cast part, weakening the metal.[1] Many of the components of pot metal are susceptible to corrosion from airborne acids and other contaminants, and the internal corrosion of the metal often causes the decorative plating to flake off.[citation needed] Pot metal is not easily glued, soldered or welded.[1]

At one time, "pot metal" referred to a copper alloy that was primarily alloyed with lead. 67% Cu, 29% Pb & 4% Sb and 80 Cu, 20% Pb were common formulations.[2]

The primary component of pot metal is zinc, but often the caster adds other metals to the mix to strengthen the cast part, improve the flow of the molten metal, or to reduce cost.[dubious – discuss] With a low melting point of 419 °C (786 °F), zinc is often alloyed with other metals including lead, tin, aluminium and copper.
[edit] See also

* Babbitt metal
* White metal
* Zamak
* Zinc aluminium
 
Since everyone already posted the wikipedia link, let me say I agree with that wiki entry COMPLETELY.

The "white metal" nomenclature comes from the shiny, white appearance of the fracture surface since it usually fails in a brittle mode, cleaving/splitting along one of the crystal planes.
 
I love polymer weapons. My M&P 15-22 and my Glock 19 are my favorite weapons I own. Gotta love em! And I also own what some would call, "real" AR's and handguns...metal...the polymer ones will kill something just as well as the non-polymer weapons. So, for on the go movement(hunting, running from zombies), I will take the lighter weapons.
 
Thanks guys. I think the term pot metal sounds a bit derogatory when describing someones rifle. Perhaps "Monkey Metal" (as in the link) would be a more palatable substitute? :D:D:D
 
we have a 4 letter word for this kind of metal... if you ever have to try and weld it this word will be the most common word said:D
 
Back
Top