Hi, all.
I fairly new to guns. 2 years this month as I bough my first gun (9mm M&P Shield). I have mostly positive experience with Shield and the S&W service in general. Shield is my CC and I do practice a lot. Shield saw around 6k rounds (+/- 5%), in the following ratio: 25% 115gr FMJ, 3%-5% SD rounds in 124gr P/P+ and remaining 70% is 124gr P Agulia and Win NATO (P+).
My SD rounds, I bought about 1.5 years ago, are Win T-Ranger and HST both in 124gr +P, as well as Hornady Critical Duty P+ 135gr. I load two Hornady rounds in each magazine first in/last out. My thinking is - if for some reason I will not be able to resolve a SD situation with 2-3 shots and will have to empty magazine - I might benefit from rounds with more penetration power.
My first question is for more experienced folks - do you see any issues in my CC approach or have any suggestions for me? ( including if using ammo marked as for LE only for civilian CC is worth the risk of any possible legal actions?)
My Shield has been serviced by S&W though (I believe they replace the slide assembly and the barrel - not sure if this has to do with using 124 NATO spec rounds or not). S&W zeroed back my aftermarket Big Dot sights ( I'm not really happy with Big Dot for target practicing, but still manage get decent grouping from 21 feet). But I DO think the Big Dot sights is a good choice for SD situation (close range/stress) - so I'll keep them.
Now going to my second question.
My other gun I bought for HD is 9mm 3.8" XDm compact (bought in January 2013) over one of M&P's only due to good reviews, lack personal knowledge/experience with guns and ability to use it for CC with 13 rds mag. I love doing nature photography and sometime going alone/with one friend in remote areas. I feel better with 13rd in MDx with two additional 19rds mags on my belt over the Shield ( I have 5 mags for the Shield, but still 8+1 is the best possible staring point. I practice less with XDm than with Shield. XDm has seen only 1000-1500 rounds 124 gr FMJ and SD rounds (147gr Federal HST's). I still load 3-4 rounds of Hornady Critical Duty 135gr P+ first in/last out in all my mags, thinking it's a good approach to have mix of 147gr P and 135gr P+. But anyone thinks it's better not to mix ammo - please let me know.
On a side note, I was very unhappy to get some run around from Springfield's service department and I think I'm done with Springfield as a company - no reason to patronize those who don't care about MY needs/questions/concerns.
Currently, I'd like to bring myself up in my marksmanship training, by entering long slide handgun territory. After researching for few weeks on the topic, I narrowed my choice to G34 and M&P Pro. G34 preferred to M&P Pro by two to one in all competition (from what I research, no credibility in this statement). Few more days of research and I set my mind on M&P Pro due to many reasons. the most important are - stock trigger, better fit in my hand and S&W service.
As I never taken part in any competition (and I'm not even sure if I will, but I definitely will try to get there). I need to understand if I need to go with 9mm M&P Pro or a CORE one (even if I will not use Red Dot in any nearest future). How are the iron sights of CORE version is compare to Novak Fiber optic one Indoors/outdoors?
Also if 9mm is a good choice or 40 is better choice for competitions? It will possibly, that in order to fund a new purchase I will have to sell XDm. So M&P Pro will become not only my training/competition gun (if i'll do competitions), but also my only HD gun. That's why I give so many details - I would like to understand all my possible options before making the new purchase.
Thank you in advance all.
I fairly new to guns. 2 years this month as I bough my first gun (9mm M&P Shield). I have mostly positive experience with Shield and the S&W service in general. Shield is my CC and I do practice a lot. Shield saw around 6k rounds (+/- 5%), in the following ratio: 25% 115gr FMJ, 3%-5% SD rounds in 124gr P/P+ and remaining 70% is 124gr P Agulia and Win NATO (P+).
My SD rounds, I bought about 1.5 years ago, are Win T-Ranger and HST both in 124gr +P, as well as Hornady Critical Duty P+ 135gr. I load two Hornady rounds in each magazine first in/last out. My thinking is - if for some reason I will not be able to resolve a SD situation with 2-3 shots and will have to empty magazine - I might benefit from rounds with more penetration power.
My first question is for more experienced folks - do you see any issues in my CC approach or have any suggestions for me? ( including if using ammo marked as for LE only for civilian CC is worth the risk of any possible legal actions?)
My Shield has been serviced by S&W though (I believe they replace the slide assembly and the barrel - not sure if this has to do with using 124 NATO spec rounds or not). S&W zeroed back my aftermarket Big Dot sights ( I'm not really happy with Big Dot for target practicing, but still manage get decent grouping from 21 feet). But I DO think the Big Dot sights is a good choice for SD situation (close range/stress) - so I'll keep them.
Now going to my second question.
My other gun I bought for HD is 9mm 3.8" XDm compact (bought in January 2013) over one of M&P's only due to good reviews, lack personal knowledge/experience with guns and ability to use it for CC with 13 rds mag. I love doing nature photography and sometime going alone/with one friend in remote areas. I feel better with 13rd in MDx with two additional 19rds mags on my belt over the Shield ( I have 5 mags for the Shield, but still 8+1 is the best possible staring point. I practice less with XDm than with Shield. XDm has seen only 1000-1500 rounds 124 gr FMJ and SD rounds (147gr Federal HST's). I still load 3-4 rounds of Hornady Critical Duty 135gr P+ first in/last out in all my mags, thinking it's a good approach to have mix of 147gr P and 135gr P+. But anyone thinks it's better not to mix ammo - please let me know.
On a side note, I was very unhappy to get some run around from Springfield's service department and I think I'm done with Springfield as a company - no reason to patronize those who don't care about MY needs/questions/concerns.
Currently, I'd like to bring myself up in my marksmanship training, by entering long slide handgun territory. After researching for few weeks on the topic, I narrowed my choice to G34 and M&P Pro. G34 preferred to M&P Pro by two to one in all competition (from what I research, no credibility in this statement). Few more days of research and I set my mind on M&P Pro due to many reasons. the most important are - stock trigger, better fit in my hand and S&W service.
As I never taken part in any competition (and I'm not even sure if I will, but I definitely will try to get there). I need to understand if I need to go with 9mm M&P Pro or a CORE one (even if I will not use Red Dot in any nearest future). How are the iron sights of CORE version is compare to Novak Fiber optic one Indoors/outdoors?
Also if 9mm is a good choice or 40 is better choice for competitions? It will possibly, that in order to fund a new purchase I will have to sell XDm. So M&P Pro will become not only my training/competition gun (if i'll do competitions), but also my only HD gun. That's why I give so many details - I would like to understand all my possible options before making the new purchase.
Thank you in advance all.