- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
- Messages
- 19,534
- Reaction score
- 30,845
I always wondered why some would spend $1,000 or close to that to put a suppressor on any gun that is routinely shot at a public range with other shooters present. I have seen some shoot their suppressed pistols with a dozen other shooters using UNsuppressed guns at the same time. So...... everyone must still wear hearing protection - and so what is the point?? The only place a suppressed pistol makes sense is if you shoot on your own land, private range or are the only one present so you don't necessarily need hearing protection. Am I missing something here?
Between the expense, waiting times, weight, size and maintenance, the only scenario for a suppressor is when you have the wherewithal to shoot privately and can control what else is being shot at the same time. At least that is what makes sense to me.
Between the expense, waiting times, weight, size and maintenance, the only scenario for a suppressor is when you have the wherewithal to shoot privately and can control what else is being shot at the same time. At least that is what makes sense to me.