Terminology of S&W Firearms

Terminology

For hundreds of years hand held single shot firearms (short guns) were referred to as pistols.
I refuse the notion that an automatic "should" be called a pistol but a revolver "can not".
My revolver has more right (historically) to be called a pistol than an automatic. I believe the semi-auto guys have hi-jacked the terminology of pistol, then tell us we can no longer call our guns that anymore.Just saying:)
 
Last edited:
Case "COLORED" hammer trigger on blue and nickel Smiths...not Case "Hardened"...

"Flash Chromed" hammer trigger on early SS Smiths not Stainless steel hammer trigger (except first model 60)
 
THE TERM "GUN" IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR USE IN THE US ARMY (AND THE USMC, I PRESUME). THE VETERANS AMONG US WILL REMEMBER THE OLD MANTRA, "THIS IS MY RIFLE, AND THIS IS MY GUN (REFERRING TO THE MALE REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS), THIS IS FOR SHOOTING AND THIS IS FOR FUN." A SHOULDERED WEAPON IS REFERRED TO BY ITS ACTUAL NOMENCLATURE, RIFLE, CARBINE, SHOTGUN, GRENADE LAUNCHER, ETC…..

A SIDE ARM MIGHT BE REFERRED TO BROADLY AS A PISTOL, BUT MUCH MORE COMMONLY THAT TERM IS USED TO REFER TO THE COLT .45 ACP (AUTO COLT PISTOL) AND OTHER SEMI-AUTOS. WHEELGUNS ARE REFERRED TO AS REVOLVERS. THERE IS A HISTORIC LINEAGE OF HAND HELD WEAPONS BACK TO SINGLE SHOT PISTOLS, BUT OVER A CENTURY AGO, THE FAMILY TREE BRANCHED……

I MIGHT ADD THAT EVEN OUR VERY OWN, BELOVED S&W FORUM SEPARATES HAND HELD WEAPONS INTO "REVOLVERS" AND "SEMI-AUTO PISTOLS"…..
 
Last edited:
For hundreds of years hand held single shot firearms (short guns) were referred to as pistols. I refuse the notion that an automatic "should" be called a pistol but a revolver "can not". My revolver has more right (historically) to be called a pistol than an automatic. I believe the semi-auto guys have hi-jacked the terminology of pistol, then tell us we can no longer call our guns that anymore.

Not for nothin' but it's a revolver and NOT a pistol!...unless we're talking semi-auto handguns.

Wrong. Revolvers were pistols before semi-autos were invented.

I quoted these three for a particular reason.

First, for clarification, the word pistol originates from either the French, the Italian, or the Czech, and a form of that word was first uttered in the 16th century in one or all of those languages, and it referred to a hand held device, perhaps a hand cannon, or some form of hand held shooting device that originated in a town of similar name. So there is no doubt that the term is aptly applied to revolvers.

What is more interesting, however, to me, anyway, is the fact that most of you call the handguns that, in this discussion, are essentially flat, to wit, not revolvers, by the term "semi-auto". It is a fact, however, that for several generations, and actually only until recently with the popularity of semi-automatic rifles versus submachine guns or assault rifles, full automatic versus semi-automatic, with semi-automatic being the politically and legally correct term now, the pistols you refer to as semi-auto were called "automatic pistols". They were never referred to as semi-anything until the late 20th century. Automatic pistol is actually the originally correct term.

Modernity and politics changed it.
 
k22fan, I CAN NEVER REMEMBER THIS DISTINCTION. AS A RESULT I USE "ITS" ALL THE TIME. LIKE A BROKEN CLOCK--I'M CORRECT SOME OF THE TIME……….
 
As for the grips vs. stocks, has somebody pointed out yet that Roy Jinks in his letters ALWAYS calls them "grips"? Interestingly, in the Colt letters, they are always stocks.
And the two parts of a grip are not sides or pieces, but panels (on whose authority? Mine, of course!).

The problem I have always had with applying the term "stocks" to a handgun's grip is that stock already has a more comprehensive meaning in firearms terminology. A rifle has a stock, which consists of a lot more than just the grip; an AK's stock has four parts, the buttstock, the grip, the forearm, and the handguard. So calling a couple of wood slabs attached to the grip "stocks" just seems a bit pretentious.

But maybe Haggis is right. I'm overthinking this; I should just go have a nice dram of Dickel's.
 
Revolvers are a subset of pistols. Sam Colt said so. Unless you are considering the BATFE GCA-68 definition.

SAMUEL COLT DIED IN 1862. AT THAT TIME, REVOLVERS WERE A SUBSET OF SINGLE SHOT PISTOLS IN HIS LIMITED EXPERIENCE. HE WAS HARDLY IN A POSITION TO JUDGE, AS THE AGE OF SEMI AUTOMATIC PISTOLS HAD NOT ARRIVED, AND REVOLVERS HAD NOT YET ECLIPSED THE SINGLE SHOT PISTOLS. IRONICALLY, THE COMPANY THAT HE LEFT BEHIND, MANUFACTURED THE MOST ICONIC AMERICAN REVOLVERS AND SEMI-AUTO PISTOLS IN EXISTENCE, AFTER HIS DEATH….
 
Back
Top