The 686 is hot but don't forget the 586!

Register to hide this ad
Before the 686 there was the beautiful blue 586 L-frame. .....
Your post seems to assume the carbon steel M586 predates the stainless M686. Do we know that to be true? In my own study of early L-frames it looks to me that both types were made simultaneously from the very beginning. In fact, it is the M686 that is more common and most likely to be found today with a low AAAxxxx or AAxxxxx serial number.
 
Your post seems to assume the carbon steel M586 predates the stainless M686. Do we know that to be true? In my own study of early L-frames it looks to me that both types were made simultaneously from the very beginning. In fact, it is the M686 that is more common and most likely to be found today with a low AAAxxxx or AAxxxxx serial number.

Ditto.......I remember both being in the case when I got a first year 6" 686.... because it was stainless and I wanted it to hunt.

That first one is long gone (scoped) replaced by another no dash 4" that I round butted in the 80s........

Today I prefer the 586 for their "curb appeal".......while some call them a poor man's Python...... I like the looks better... not to mention the grip, trigger reach and the smooth S&W double action .
 
I started this revolver affliction with a new 586, then traded my bro in law outta a 686 no dash a few weeks later. Both were four inch barrels. The older 686 has the better "feeling" trigger, but that new 586 just shoots better for several family members. Then my dang gun store buddy set the hook when he dangled the 3" 686+ 3-5-7 series in front of me. The 686+ has replaced my mucho trustworthy Para P13 as my bedside bump in the night companion.
 

Attachments

  • 20170223_122737.jpg
    20170223_122737.jpg
    107.7 KB · Views: 93
Last edited:
686 began production first in 1980 and the 586 in 1981.....per SCSW.
 
Decisions, decisions,
7920404e-72e4-49c2-88ed-8bb31767e562_zpshpsbq4wq.jpg
 
Long-range accuracy?

Before the 686 there was the beautiful blue 586 L-frame. Here's some pics of my first year 586, No Dash, 8", with a 2x Leupold scope. Long range accuracy is amazing with this combo. I bought it new and have used it for hunting, NRA silhouettes, and just plan fun.

Show me your 586 .....

I have one too. Curious what kind of long-range accuracy that you might have with this 8" and what kind of ammo/bullet weight you are using? thank tkdguy
 
I love my 586 no dash.
Somebody changed the rear sight and I kinda want to get the factory sight on there.
I might send it for the "M" upgrade and have them stick a factory sight on there at the same time.

IMG_7426.jpg
 
Last edited:
I love my 586 no dash.
Somebody changed the rear sight and I kinda want to get the factory sight on there.
I might send it for the "M" upgrade and have them stick a facory sight on there at the same time.

IMG_7426.jpg

That Millet rear site will bring in some cash on line.
 
Before the 686 there was the beautiful blue 586 L-frame. Here's some pics of my first year 586, No Dash, 8", with a 2x Leupold scope. Long range accuracy is amazing with this combo. I bought it new and have used it for hunting, NRA silhouettes, and just plan fun.

Show me your 586 .....

I too have a no dash 8 3/8" 586.. While the long tom barrel isn't very practical for much other than hunting or long range targets it is a beautiful and very accurate revolver. I prefer the deep high luster of a great bluing job over the stainless.
 
... I might send it for the "M" upgrade and have them stick a facory sight on there at the same time....
Unfortunately, the factory ran out of the old style rear sight years ago. The current rear sight won't fit, they changed the shape back in the '90's.

You can get an old style rear on eBay. Just be sure to verify the precise location of the front screw hole. Not all are in the exact same spot.
 
I sold off a 4" prelock 686 to buy a 4" prelock 586.

Much prefer the carbon steel. Call me kooky, but it feels better. Sure it really isn't different, but feels like it to me.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top