+1 - the 938 is just a bit larger than the LCP or the BG, but still small enough for summer pocket carry. I pocket carried mine for two days at Universal Studios last year with no problems.The Sig P938 is a 9mm and it's pretty small.
As usual I could have communicated better in my OP so let me take you through my decision making process a little bit.
1. Occasionally I am required to attend training seminars for my employer, the dress at these seminars is always "business casual" which my employer defines as Dockers and a tucked in Polo. No one has stated that firearms aren't allowed at these seminars but I don't want to be the test case. I'm looking for a gun that I can pocket carry in that circumstance that I know isn't going to be detected. A "tuckable" holster isn't an option unless there's one out there that doesn't show at all on the outside of the pant
2. I have made a decision to only feed three calibers of my guns .380, 9mm & .40S&W. I don't want to get into a new caliber so it has to be 1 of those three. Unless I can find concealable 9mm revolver, revolvers are out as are .22s ,32s, .45s and the M203.
3. Based on the criteria above I felt that I was limited to a .380 from the start the only reason I even considered a 9mm (or a .40S&W) is because the shield was mentioned as a possible choice on another forum and I am going to look at even though I don't think it's going to make the cut on size.
4. I don't buy new guns often and when I do I try to get something compatible with what I already have. In this case the big advantage the LCP has over the Bodyguard is that I already have one so any magazines I purchased or any holsters would be interchangeable between my LCP and my wife's
5. My primary reason for considering a Bodyguard was because I didn't know that much about it and didn't want to miss a good choice.
Bearing all that in mind, right now the LCP looks like the winner but I may still end up with a shield.
The shield has the advantage of being a 9mm which I would prefer to a .380 but the LCP has the edge in concealability and as I told my wife even though my intent isn't to pick up a BUG I'd probably end up using the LCP in that capacity because it is so concealable.
So with all that in mind it still looks like the LCP is going to be the winner
I’m looking at getting a pocket pistol; I’ve narrowed my choices to an LCP or a Bodyguard.
My first criteria is that it really has to be a pocket pistol, I want to be able to put it in my pocket and have it disappear so I’m probably looking at a .380 (unless there is a 9mm out there that’s actually that small)
I don’t want a revolver, because again I need something that is absolutely concealable and I don’t want to get into a new caliber.
I’ve narrowed my choices to an LCP or a Bodyguard.
The biggest plus of the LCP is that my wife already has one so I’m don’t have to pick up all new magazines for a bodyguard. The plus for the bodyguard is that it’s a S&W.
I’d like input from owners of one or both as to which would be the better choice.
With all of the new,very small 9 mms out there, why would anyone want to rely on a marginal caliber like the .380 to defend their life? What the hell? I guess you have to make the decision on how much it's worth, not me.
I understand all that. However, being used to pocket carrying my 642 on a regular basis, which is by no means difficult, then carrying either the LCP or a BG380 would be a breeze. The marginal difference in size and weight between the two is negligible to me, therefore I'd choose with the one that had the better features even if they might not ever be needed.Depends on the owner/shooter.
I don't see the last shot hold-open as an especially critical issue for the nature and intended role of the diminutive .380 pocket pistol. None of my 5-shot snubs even offer that option.![]()
Lots of pistols lack "second strike capability", but you can see how a gun company might promote it as a beneficial feature if they can work it into their design. Sounds good, even if it's not something being consistently taught in a lot of defensive/service training venues.
I've not seen how a "second strike" benefit is something all that desirable, for my needs, but then I don't train to try a second trigger pull for semiauto pistols. I resort to a clearance manipulation to get another round up and chambered.
The whole second-strike thing is sometimes mentioned as being useful because DA revolvers have a "second-strike capability", but that's a bit different and somewhat disingenuous. DA revolvers have a "next-strike capability", as the "second" trigger pull is actually bringing up a fresh round under the hammer, not trying to re-strike the first round that didn't fire.
Better sights? While good sights are always a handy thing to have (and aging eyes need increasingly larger, more easily seen sights), it's a subjectively valued feature that has to be determined by each individual.
For example, I like the newer, wider style fixed post/notch sights on the J-frames over the older narrow style post/notch sights on the J's ... but I like the XS front sight & wide U-notch on the M&P snubs better, still ... and I don't care for the fiber optic sights (which, while easily seen, can be more easily damaged). Subjective, right?
Different folks place a different priority on different features, and the gun companies are trying to attract the widest number of buyers with their standard features.
Not all of us apparently fit into each and every tidy check box on every marketing survey, I suspect.![]()
Just a little to big and I don't sit on my gunWhy not please ?
Because even the smallest 9mm isn't as small as an LCP. And even the smallest difference in size can make all the difference in the world.
I've been researching myself, and I'm going with the LCP. My dilemma now is do I want the Lazermax or the Crimson trace.
Get the Crimson Trace. The Lasermax is a piece of ****. It constantly turns itself on, wasting the battery and keeping your pocket glowing red. The Crimson Trace is pressure on only, making it easy to use. I have not used the Veridian, but it seems to have a better design for using index figure to turn it on and off.
Get the Crimson Trace. The Lasermax is a piece of ****. It constantly turns itself on, wasting the battery and keeping your pocket glowing red. The Crimson Trace is pressure on only, making it easy to use. I have not used the Veridian, but it seems to have a better design for using index figure to turn it on and off.
Some might find the recoil of the 9mm too much to bring back on target quickly for the follow up shot. More shots on target with a .380 can trump the better stopping power of the 9mm.With all of the new,very small 9 mms out there, why would anyone want to rely on a marginal caliber like the .380 to defend their life?