Thinking of buying an M&P

[sig2009]

How are the triggers on these? Are they like the Glock long and mushy?

 

[MaJeeper]

They suck. (In Mass anyway) Long and mushy is a great description. I, however, just purchased one from my buddy tonight. I had shot it before and hated the trigger, especially after shooting my 1911. I did, however, like the gun overall. Plus, I got it so cheap it was almost free. He is in financial dire straights, so I bought it. I'm looking for a smith, or maybe back to S&W, to do a trigger on it. I wouldn't let the trigger deter you from purchasing. Good Luck

 

[novalty]

I've tried two fullsize models, the first in 40S&W, and didn't care for the recoil, so wasn't overly anxious to try my friends 45. However, after shooting the M&P 45, I was extremely suprised at how well it shot and how manageable the recoil was. I thought the trigger was great, short and quick resetting for a DAO. They have 10 round mags, adjustable backstraps, and the option of Crimson Trace grips (not for ambi-safety model), and his at least fired pretty darn accurate right out of the box. It did a pretty good job of changing my mind about polymer frames.

 

[Knightrider03m]

I have a 9mm compact that I'm in love with. The trigger is great, the fit and finish is great, and the size it great. Buy one!

 

[sig2009]

Are these Double Action or Double Action Only?

 

[novalty]

Are these Double Action or Double Action Only?

I believe they are considered Double Action Only, as they are striker fired.

 

[Spotteddog]

The triggers improve with use.
None I've fired (9X19 & .40 S&W full/mid/compact) were anywhere near what I'd call "hard kickers"? Each was amazingly accurate.
If you can't abide the trigger, Burwell or S&W will help.
If you want to DIY, Burwell has a you tube video on how to. Apex has a hard sear currently available and a striker assembly in the works. The Apex parts give far more "feel" to the trigger. With the reset being far shorter and more positive. But, after getting used to the stock trigger and wearing the sharp corners off of the surfaces by firing enough rounds, you might find the stock trigger to be fine. But not every gun, is for everybody? I had a real hurdle with it being my first non-1911'. I'm glad I persevered now.

 

[Swabby]

I've put about 500 rounds through my M&P40 since last summer. I think the trigger is relatively good for this style of handgun. It is better than the Glock, Springfield XD, S&W99 and Sigma (have tried an H&K before but can't remember what the trigger was like). The stroke is not as long, it is not as heavy, and does reset very quickly. They are not designed to have a trigger like a SA/DA auto. It's a different beast completely. I do love the M&P, however. The ergonomics of the grip are great. The Melonite over stainless slide is extremely durable, as well as, a stainless barrel. The low profile sights are slick, yet easy to pick up. It has an ambi slide stop (I am not left handed, but I understand some people in this world are). The slide stop and mag release are easy to reach without re-adjusting your grip. They have magazines made out of durable metal, which fall freely from the well when released (full, partially full, or empty). Interchangeable backstraps and a stippled front on the grip. A large trigger guard for a gloved finger. An integrated rail on the frame. Mine has no IL or magazine safety. It is easy to field strip and clean, and has an encapsulated recoil sping so it doesn't knock your eye out. And the gun has some style, with the cool looking serrations on the rear of the slide, the contoured front, and rounded edges. Between the M&P, Glock, Springfield XD, and H&K UPS, I would choose the M&P hands down. Mine is a shooter, as I'm sure most of them are.

 

[maxthedog]

I think the trigger is relatively good for this style of handgun. It is better than the Glock, Springfield XD, S&W99 and Sigma (have tried an H&K before but can't remember what the trigger was like). The stroke is not as long, it is not as heavy, and does reset very quickly.

I'd second what Swabby said. I have a M&P 357c and a SA XDm-40 and I find the take-up much shorter on the M&P and the reset is faster. I found that it was faster to get comfortable with the M&P vs the XDm.

One thing that differed between the two was the interchangeable backstraps - the M&P requires no tools, while you have to punch a pin out with a drift on the XDm, which is annoying. I found I needed to shoot with all the backstraps to find the most comfortable one, so getting the M&P dialed in at the range was quicker. A small point I know, but it's one reason why the M&P is my carry gun.

 

[MattB]

They suck. (In Mass anyway) Long and mushy is a great description. I, however, just purchased one from my buddy tonight. I had shot it before and hated the trigger, especially after shooting my 1911. I did, however, like the gun overall. Plus, I got it so cheap it was almost free. He is in financial dire straights, so I bought it. I'm looking for a smith, or maybe back to S&W, to do a trigger on it. I wouldn't let the trigger deter you from purchasing. Good Luck

The MA trigger is significantly heavier than the one used on M&P pistols for the rest of the country. The trigger on mine is pretty good, about 7.5lbs and while it does have a slight take-up it does break cleanly.

 

[sig2009]

I believe they are considered Double Action Only, as they are striker fired.

There is a difference between the double action and double action only. The glock and xd are double action and both are striker fired. I saw a couple M&P'S listed on Buds Gun Shop. Some were listed as double action and others were listed double action only. With double action the trigger pull is reduced when another round chambers and the striker is ready to fire again. With double action only you have the long trigger pull everytime because you are cocking it by pulling the trigger.

Here one is listed as Double Action Only: http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/21_39_71/products_id/37132

This one is listed as Double Action: http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/cPath/21_39_71/products_id/38993

 

[Wee Hooker]

The MA trigger is significantly heavier than the one used on M&P pistols for the rest of the country. The trigger on mine is pretty good, about 7.5lbs and while it does have a slight take-up it does break cleanly.

The MA trigger is easily fixed with a $4 spring from Brownells and a 10 min install. They come @ 10# from the factory. Both my MA guns now had a decently crisp 7# trigger pull. There is also a easy online tutorial that will help the handy ( and comfortable) to do your own trigger job if you want smoother or lower.

 

[Desertsloth]

I have a MP .40 compact and at first the trigger seemed bulky, but the pistol has amazed me with its accuracy out of a 3.5" barrel, and I have gotten used to the trigger action and have totally forgotten correcting it. Buy with confidence!

 

[greener]

I've had an M&P9 for about 3 years. The trigger has been good. Not heavy and reasonably crisp. It is not a target trigger and is not quite as good as the one in my 1911. For the type of weapon, the trigger is pretty good. I've fired a couple of M&P's that have had the trigger job from Burwell Gunsmithing. If you want an improved M&P trigger, Burwell is worth the money. Excellent.

Took me a bit of time to get accustomed to the M&P. After that the thing turned out to be pretty accurate. Has always been reliable. I do not recall one failure or problem, even with the ammo I've reloaded for it. Seems to shoot anything without problem and accurately.

I have had one ammo problem with my M&P, a buddy loaded some rounds that the best groups were about 3' at 15 yards and every round a keyhole. Did that with three different pistols. The M&P couldn't correct an absolutely terrible bullet and load.

 

[crofoot629]

I had the opportunity to T&E a slew of M&P's in .40 and .45. None of them had the frame mounted safety though. Too bad for me, I'd like to try one.

The triggers on the guns I shot were similar to a Glock 5.5 lbs trigger, only worse. They are both manageable to me with practice.

I'd buy one without hesitation. I think they have been out long enough to be proven performers. I'm particularly sour on Glock because their 22's and 23's are so problematic with lights attached. I also prefer guns with frame mounted safeties, ala 1911's.

Emory

 

[Dirtman]

I have no problem with the MP triggers since mine have no external safety I prefer to have some resistance for safety reasons. I wouldn't want a very light trigger without a thumb safety.
My MP 9 pro had a excellent trigger right out of the box. My MP 9c had some feed problems loading the last round out of the magazine, which is a sorta common problem I understand. I had to send it back to S & W twice (at their expense) for the same problem. They fixed the problem and sent me a free extra magazine for my trouble. Great customer service!
Since getting my compact back the trigger is much lighter so I suspect they did something to it or it has just lightened with use. I have never had any other problems with any of my MP's.

 

[Infidel]

I recently bought a new M&P45 and the trigger is quite good. I was initially surprised at what a nice shooting pistol it is.

 

[Oscar 14]

Got an M&P 9c awhile ago. The more I shoot it the more I like it. So far it has worked flawlessly and I see more M&Ps in my future.

 

[sig2009]

Just scored one off Gunbroker NIB for $350. Dealer had 100 of them NIB for sale. M&P fullsize .357 Sig with 2-15 round mags and trijicon nite sites. He sold like 80 of them. He also has a couple NIB listed for $320 buy it now with 10 round mags and no nite sites. Smokin' deal for anyone interested!!!!!!!!!
Smith & Wesson S&W M&P 357 SIG NIGHT SIGHTS NIB : Semi-auto at GunBroker.com

 

[XAVMECH]

M&P vs Glock..and some others

Interesting thread. I'm a previous owner of a Glock 19. Really liked though it did have some trigger work done. Thought I'd prefer a .40 and bought a Sig 229, which a wonderful piece. BUT - Looking at the compact side of things, I decided on the M&P compact .40. I must say that I'm generally pretty pleased with it. Not as nice a gun as the Sig, in terms of quality and ease of field stripping, but I really like the size and ergonomics. I was able to find a NIB S&W 6904 the other day (used to own one of these years ago) and took it and the M&P out to the range this week. I like the idea of an SA/DA semi-auto, and even though I prefer the feel of the 6904, the M&P easily out shot it on the range - much to my surprise. AND - I prefer the trigger pull to the 6904. The M&P I ordered has the thumb safety and NO magazine safety.
Next time the Sig 229 and M&P will get to take the trip together. BTW, I carry the M&P because of its size as a CCW.