Time machine to the 90's

Well loving revolvers, I would have one of the LH 19-7 3" guns with the magnaporting. Would have rather just got one of the barrels before the porting. Then a few more 4" 14s and not shot them. Throw in a few more PC autos.

I like the full lug guns. The 4 " and 5" guns are about perfect.
Love the full lugs.
 

Attachments

  • LUGGS.jpg
    LUGGS.jpg
    113.3 KB · Views: 83
1990's? Any 586/686-4, 29-5 or -6, 629-3 or -4 in any variation. I'm still looking for more 586-4's in all barrel lengths.

My "Back to the 90's" accumulation consists of:
25-9 .45 Colt Target Heavy Barrel, 6", 1990.
27-5 .357 Magnum, 5", 1991.
29-5 .44 MagnaClassic", 7-1/2" full lug, 1990.
29-6 .44 Classic", 6-1/2" full lug, 1994.
586-3 The .357 Distinguished Combat Magnum, 6", 1992.
586-4 The .357 Distinguished Combat Magnum, 4", 103519 (not cataloged), 1997.
625-5 .45 Colt Classic Stainless. 1993 Stocking Dealer Special. 5" full lug, 100430, 1993.
625-6 Model of 1989 .45 Stainless Colt Mountain Gun, 130045, 1996.
629-3 .44 Classic Stainless 5" full lug, 1992.
629-4 1993 Mountain Gun, 103653, 1995.
629-4 .44 Magnum Stainless, 103606 RD butt, 1994.
629-4 .44 Magnum Stainless, 103606 SQ butt, 1994.
686-4 Plus .357 Distinguished Combat Magnum 7-Shot, 4", 104194, 1996.
686-4 The .357 Distinguished Combat Magnum Stainless, 6", 104224, 1996.
 
Last edited:
The 629-4

pix713067483.jpg


I looked into finding all types of the dash 4. With some research I realized it would cost over 30k at the going rates as there were more than 20 variations of the -4 629.
 
If I could go back to the 90's, I'd be buying guns from the 50's through the 70's a lot cheaper than they are now. S&W hasn't made a revolver since 1982 that I'm interested in.

Yes, I have to agree with you about the pined & recessed pre 82 smiths. Unfortunately I have been selling the nicer collector types to afford more lower priced shooters.

There was a time when the classic models with there full under lug came out, that I thought they were ugly looking and avoided them. Now 30 years later, somehow a dozen or so have made it into the safe.
 
16-4, in 4" 6" and 8 1/2" just for fun. Mountain guns in 44 and 45 along with 17, 18, 686, 657 and 629. I believe quality was better then.
 
Yes, I have to agree with you about the pined & recessed pre 82 smiths. Unfortunately I have been selling the nicer collector types to afford more lower priced shooters.

There was a time when the classic models with there full under lug came out, that I thought they were ugly looking and avoided them. Now 30 years later, somehow a dozen or so have made it into the safe.

I shoot the pre-82's, even the nice ones, for the most part. I never could get my head around the full underlug on a S&W. Somehow they look great on a Colt, though.
 
Back
Top