Timeless classics, some new some old

Comrad

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
4,300
Location
New Jersestan
I don't like modern fads and that translates to my taste in guns. I have been shopping for months and just filed my paperwork for purchase permits in NJ and it coming close to decision time.

Thinking of... Baretta 92FS, kind of big but I think it's earned it's place as a classic, already have a 6906 and not sure I need or want another 9mm but do like the idea of getting the .22 practice kit for it.

Thinking of a Walther PPK/S would like it in 7.65 but possible .380 and then there's the .22 version, I am a 007 fan.

Would love to own a Model 45 .22 Post Office gun but prices are out of sight, same goes for the Model 650 only if I could get it with the .22 WLR cylinder.

Back to Baretta, maybe a model 80 Cheetah.

Decisions decisions, I would be interested in all opinions of must have guns. Carry is not an option here,NJ, just going to be a little range use and become part of a little collection of stuff my kids can fight over when I stop pumping air.
 
Register to hide this ad
if you can find one of each model & caliber to shoot, perhaps a friend's, or rent one from a range, before you purchase might be a good idea. There are some folks who think that the recoil of a Walther PPK/PP in 9mmKurz (.380 ACP )especially, kicks too much. I've never been able to tell the difference between it & the 7.65 mm (.32 ACP)... but I suspect it's all to do with the shape/size of our hands. Running a box or two of good ammo thru say the Beretta & the Walther could narrow it down for you on that,........ finding the different .22 models at a range might be harder to do........heck..... just buy 1 of each........that way you're covered.. In Missouri, we only have to do the standard yellow sheet at a dealer's shop. Between friends in a private transaction, no permit is required. I'm glad I live in Missouri.
 
Yes, a range trip to rent is in the works, considering permit times in NJ can be 4 - 6 weeks. I will check out that P6 too.

Can somebody tell me why nice .22 WLR revolvers are so expensive? Every one that I like is a thousand plus.
 
I've got a Walther PP in .32, and also a Beretta 84F Cheetah, which is a .380. Both are strictly range guns for me. Each is fun to shoot, meaning they can be shot accurately.
 
I do love my 3rd generation Smiths and 1911s but in all honesty shooting the Beretta 92fs is a joy. In my opinion not a great carry gun but for what you will use it for, range use, it is ideal. Very accurate and lite recoil. Easy take down and clean up. Good luck with your decision.
 
I do like the 92FS for all the usual reasons and a big bonus for me would be to use the .22 practice kit to scratch my .22 LR itch. We can apply for 3 purchase permits at a time so that leave me with 2 other potential purchases.
I like the PPK/s but read that slide bite can be a problem and that .380 is a little stout for that size in my getting older hands. I also read that the .32 ACP might be a little gentler but they are hard to find in these parts.

Still looking for that S&W 650 with both cylinders for under a grand, yeah that's the ticket.
 
BHP, CZ-75, American made 1911's...the wife likes PPK's and will probably get one eventually.
 
I also would like to have a 650. I have passed on a couple, thought they were too high! Mistake!!
I'm not sure I ever saw the USPS 22.
In your apparent State of much control, the recommendation to test fire before purchase sounds good to me.
 
My taste in handguns is eclectic for sure. I surely love my S&W revolvers but there are others that I think any and all gun cranks NEED in their safe.

1911A1 or commander

Colt Python or diamondback

BHP

Walther PPK or /s

Colt SAA or clone

Ruger SBH in .44 mag

A dedicated .22 LR target auto; High Standard, Ruger, Colt Target, etc.

S&W revolvers, must haves; K-22, K-38, 4" M-19, 6.5" M-29, and a Kit Gun, at minimum.
 
Frank hit the nail on the head. There are some guns that are just iconic and just beg to be added to any good assortment.
 
My point is that I don't think something new can be timeless. Unless you mean time-less meaning "having no time".
 
Back
Top