minuteman
US Veteran
I bet this study was paid for with 'stimulus' money....
almost five Philadelphians were shot every day over the course of the study and about 1 of these 5 people died. The research team concluded that, although successful defensive gun uses are possible and do occur each year, the chances of success are low.
Yeah, but I think even this situation -- no one has a gun so no one gets shot -- would be a bad state of affairs. It means the BGs who are bigger and stronger than the physically weaker members of society just do whatever they want. Might makes right. It's caveman time.The basic premise that no one would be shot if no one had a gun is hard to refute. In fact it’s a truism.
These shooting cases were matched to Philadelphia residents who acted as the study's controls. To identify the controls, trained phone canvassers called random Philadelphians soon after a reported shooting and asked about their possession of a gun at the time of the shooting. These random Philadelphians had not been shot and had nothing to do with the shooting. This is the same approach that epidemiologists have historically used to establish links between such things as smoking and lung cancer or drinking and car crashes.