Rodfac
Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 97
- Reaction score
- 271
I sent a M-63 back for a forcing cone/cylinder gap problem (0.010" on the left side & 0.004" on the right) resulting in a lot of lead spitting back in my face. Smith fixed all that with a new bbl., cylinder, & hand....and did a trigger job on the gun as well....all on their dime...in ~6 weeks. Granted, it shouldn't have left the factory like that...but they fixed it in good time, considering the Covid/supply chain problems last year.
Personally, in 51 years of owning and shooting S&W revolvers, I've had to send 2 guns back for work...(one was 22 years old at the time) and they fixed them, free, both of them. I've got no gripes with their customer service dept... but do think that their final revolver quality control checks have deteriorated over the years.
As to numbers: I have bought a two M-69's, a M-60, a M-629, a M-637, a M-63, plus a Bodyguard 380 & a Shield in the last 5-6 years....all but the M-63 were good to go for reliability, accuracy, fit and finish; right out of the box. Currently there are 18 Smith's in my safe, and I've given another 4 away to friends and family in the last decade...none had any problems aside from the two mentioned above...a sterling record I'd submit.
Currently, I think S&W is innovative in a competitive industry that's constantly under attack by tort lawyers and misguided governmental bureaucrats with a ban-all-guns agenda. And while I dislike the internal lock fiasco, and bemoan its continuous use, and also question the necessity for two piece barrels, I can't say that the first has tied up the gun, and I suspect the 2nd results in better accuracy and a stouter revolver.
I agree that their are some problems as delineated above with S&W's business plan, but damning the entire company for a QC problem with a single product is over the top IMHO. YMMv Rod
Personally, in 51 years of owning and shooting S&W revolvers, I've had to send 2 guns back for work...(one was 22 years old at the time) and they fixed them, free, both of them. I've got no gripes with their customer service dept... but do think that their final revolver quality control checks have deteriorated over the years.
As to numbers: I have bought a two M-69's, a M-60, a M-629, a M-637, a M-63, plus a Bodyguard 380 & a Shield in the last 5-6 years....all but the M-63 were good to go for reliability, accuracy, fit and finish; right out of the box. Currently there are 18 Smith's in my safe, and I've given another 4 away to friends and family in the last decade...none had any problems aside from the two mentioned above...a sterling record I'd submit.
Currently, I think S&W is innovative in a competitive industry that's constantly under attack by tort lawyers and misguided governmental bureaucrats with a ban-all-guns agenda. And while I dislike the internal lock fiasco, and bemoan its continuous use, and also question the necessity for two piece barrels, I can't say that the first has tied up the gun, and I suspect the 2nd results in better accuracy and a stouter revolver.
I agree that their are some problems as delineated above with S&W's business plan, but damning the entire company for a QC problem with a single product is over the top IMHO. YMMv Rod
Last edited: