Originally posted by Marcruger:
I fully expect to be branded as a heretic, boiled in oil, and burned at the stake, but I am not a fan of the 24-3. I had one, new in the box. Don't get me wrong, the configuration and caliber and balance are perfect. It's the poor workmanship. I notice almost all of the ones shown here have the same "two-tone" finish mine had....mainly a dark black barrel and a milky looking lighter frame. The one I had's blue was foggy looking on each side behind the cylinder. Also, the polish job was way poor compared to even late '70's N-frames. The action on the gun I had was rough, the trigger heavy. Also, the rear sight had to be cranked all the way left to get it on the paper at 25 yards. I sold it to a guy who was thrilled to get one to go in his safe as an "investment". I have handled and shot a new 24-6. Say what you want about the locks....the 24-6 is better in all respects to the 24-3 I had and the ones I've seen. The original 29 Mountain Gun (same configuration really) is also much better fit, finish, and action to the 24-3's I've handled. I'd like to buy a 24-6 3" nickle one day. I don't doubt that there are some good 24-3's, but the 24-3's I've seen have had poor workmanship. Look them over carefully before buying one. I definitely think some folks have a hole in their head to buy for the prices I've seen. If the gun wasn't chambered in .44 Special, it would be ridiculed for poor '80's workmanship, and be low priced. Buyers, keep your eyes open with no rose colored glasses. Fender guitars made some lousy guitars in the late '60's, but now folks pay big money for them because they are "old classics". Poor quality new, poor now. Just my 2 cents worth. God Bless, Marc