Victory Model reparkerizing--Recommendation?

Joined
Jan 5, 2024
Messages
775
Reaction score
1,706
Location
Central Florida
I bought a very tired but solid 1942 era Victory from a local auction. The mechanics seem good, so I am going for a period color correct re-parkerization on it. There used to be a company in Knoxville, TN that I used and they were reasonable, but they are no longer in business...That was 20 years ago.

Any recommendations, that won't break the bank too badly? Anybody on here do that?
 

Attachments

  • Victory I won.jpg
    Victory I won.jpg
    57.7 KB · Views: 125
  • Victory I won2.jpg
    Victory I won2.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 101
Register to hide this ad
Attached is a quick and excellent explanation of the finish on the Victory Model revolvers by our resident Victory Model revolver expert Charlie Flick. If I understand it correctly, if you are trying to match the original finish, it's not going to happen. However, if you just want it re-Parkerized, Ford's Guns in Crystal River is supposed to be tops in our neck of the woods. Maybe that's who you were thinking about? I believe it will set you back around $350, and there used to be a significant waiting period. FWIW, if it was mine, I would replace the lanyard ring and a put a set of original (used) wood military grips on it, and leave the finish like it is.

One thing you may want to consider before you do anything to it, is that it could be a USAF security police revolver. I'm going to go find and post a picture; so, that you can see what I'm talking about. If that is the case (a S&W letter would tell you), I would definitely not do a thing to it.

Ford's Custom Gun Refinishing | Crystal River, FL
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240307-211750~2.jpg
    Screenshot_20240307-211750~2.jpg
    23.9 KB · Views: 63
I don't believe it is a USAF gun, although I will letter it to be sure before I do anything...From what I have seen, (pic attached), The early USAF LeMay guns were nickeled Victories with lanyard ring attached and ring was nickeled as well. I remember reading on here that the letter wouldn't indicate a USAF SAC gun because those guns were pulled from existing DoD stocks and given to the USAF as needed. The letter would only indicate that it was sold to the US government on its original 1940's invoice, not the 1960's redo.

On this one, no "US PROPERTY" or "US NAVY" markings on topstrap or side of frame.....It is .38 Special 4 inch with two ordnance bombs on butt...It came from a Florida auction in Tallahassee.

As to the parkerizing, I know it won't be the "midnight black" finish, but I can't stand the way it looks now and a nice clean park can only help it...I am getting the correct grips and lanyard ring. The lanyard ring hole is open and the pin is still in place, so a correct ring will be a 5 minute install.

As to the company, I was thinking about a place in Knoxville TN where I used to live called "Hawkeye's Refinishing". He refinished thousands of M1 Garands and was one of the few people that had down the secret of getting a dark gray/green parkerized finish...I know the secret method, because he told me how he did it 25 years ago, but his store is closed now. My carbine and Garand that he did turned out museum beautiful with the dark gray/green parkerized finish. I'd like to finish this one the same way.
 

Attachments

  • SAC Elite Guard.jpg
    SAC Elite Guard.jpg
    67 KB · Views: 47
Last edited:
Here are some pictures. Notice the grips. If you decide to get a letter on it and it turns outnto be a USAF cop gun; then, you may want to consider have it nickel plated (I believe they all were, but I'm not 100% sure). Also, some had nickeled lanyard loops and some seem to have had it removed altogether.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    10.2 KB · Views: 85
  • 8694193_orig.jpg
    8694193_orig.jpg
    46.3 KB · Views: 63
  • 4862065_orig.jpg
    4862065_orig.jpg
    22.6 KB · Views: 66
  • 4561911_orig.jpg
    4561911_orig.jpg
    32.1 KB · Views: 65
  • 7859076_orig.jpg
    7859076_orig.jpg
    105.9 KB · Views: 63
Here are some pictures. Notice the grips. If you decide to get a letter on it and it turns outnto be a USAF cop gun; then, you may want to consider have it nickel plated (I believe they all were, but I'm not 100% sure). Also, some had nickeled lanyard loops and some seem to have had it removed altogether.

That's funny because I have all of your pics but one...In fact, the first one you posted I used in a WTB ad on here for a mock gun to buy for a SAC display. I have the correct uniform, beret, Bucheimer cross draw holster and blue SAC belt...Just waiting on a nickel bubba'd victory to put in it.
 
Ford's is offering $40 off for St. Patrick's Day if you decide to re-parkerize it. Good luck to you, whatever you decide to do with your revolver.
 
I think we have gone completely off the rails here regarding some of the replies. Except for a very small number, Victories were always hot blued over a dull bead blasted metal finish. It was called both military midnight black and black magic, NOT phosphate (Parkerized) finished. These are simply names for the hot dip black oxide bluing method still in common use by most gun manufacturers today. It was much faster than the traditional S&W bluing process so it speeded up wartime production greatly.

If you want to refinish it like it was when left the factory in 1942, simply get it re-blued without polishing the metal. It could be re-bead blasted before bluing if you wish, and that might look better. This information is widely known and has been discussed on this forum many, many times. Not sure how the story about Parkerized Victories ever got started. They weren't. Except for some rebuilds done by the Australian Military after the war.

Any local gunsmith with a bluing tank and a bead blasting booth can do the job. It is very simple, I have finished many guns that way myself. No need to send it off to Ford's or similar places and spend a ton of money.

A simpler and cheaper method is just to degrease the gun well and cold blue it with Oxypho Blue from Brownell's. It will probably look just as good. You might try that before doing anything costly. And lose the Franzite grips.

If you still want to give it an incorrect phosphate finish, which I cannot recommend, there are DIY kits available. It is a fairly straightforward and simple procedure.
 
Last edited:
It's an original WW2 gun. It looks fine to me as is. I would much rather have it as is rather than with a buffing and Nickel plating. Spend a bunch of money to lower the value. If you "can't stand it" as is sell it and buy what you want.
 
It's an original WW2 gun. It looks fine to me as is. I would much rather have it as is rather than with a buffing and Nickel plating. Spend a bunch of money to lower the value. If you "can't stand it" as is sell it and buy what you want.

I'm not buffing it and I'm not nickel plating it, I am parkerizing it. The nickel plating was in regard to the SAC guns, not this one.
 
The original finish was Black Magic (chemical blue) over 120 grit sand blast. With the lack of markings it was originally a DSC shipped gun for domestic use. The SAC/USAF guns will not letter going to the Air Force and they were chrome plated, not nickel.
 
It would probably be helpful to recount how we got here.
JP@AK summarizes it in this post. It will take a while for the misunderstanding to get corrected.


My interpretation is something like this:
Bright Carbonia blue to December ’41 (before V serial numbers used)
Followed at some time (exact start known?) with a sand blasted surface with a hot tank black oxide.
Phosphate (Parkerized) on some Victories around May ‘42.
Midnight Black is the term S&W apparently used for the matte blasted and black oxide finish.


Several collectors have posted the term Midnight Black shows up on S&W documents. I don't know if Black Magic also shows up on S&W documents. If so I would have to say that's pretty definative. Poking around Hubbard-Hall's website I see that these days they also offer their own oil retaining maganese phosphate finishes.
 
Last edited:
I believe most of the gun hot bluing formulations on the market are re-packaged and re-branded Hubbard-Hall products. We always used the bluing salts composition sold by Brownell's. Two things are essential, namely thoroughly degreasing the metal to be blued and also maintaining a relatively constant bluing bath temperature. We used direct gas fired stainless steel bluing tanks, and adjusted temperature within a 5 deg. F. temperature range by either adding more bluing salts to increase the bath temperature or adding water to lower the bath temperature. The typical way to clean and degrease the parts to be blued was by boiling them in a silicated detergent solution. But there were nearly always some parts that did not blue satisfactorily and had to be re-blued. I changed to doing a parts wipe down using MEK instead of using the silicated cleaner. That really reduced the bluing defect problem. Except the MEK wipedown has to be done outside for ventilation due to the MEK vapor and its flammability. And it required very little more time to do the MEK wipe than boiling parts in the aqueous silicate cleaning bath.

The actual bluing of a gun is the easy part. The metal prep and polish is the time-consuming and labor intensive.part. Hot oxide bath bluing wasn't really in wide use as a gun finishing procedure until late in the 1930s. Ned Schwing's book on Winchester Slide Action .22 Rifles contains a fairly extensive discussion of how Winchester did hot oxide bath gun bluing, very worthwhile reading. Previously, Winchester did mainly rust bluing of its guns.
 
Last edited:
It would probably be helpful to recount how we got here.
JP@AK summarizes it in this post. It will take a while for the misunderstanding to get corrected.

Several collectors have posted the term Midnight Black shows up on S&W documents. I don't know if Black Magic also shows up on S&W documents. If so I would have to say that's pretty definative. Poking around Hubbard-Hall's website I see that these days they also offer their own oil retaining maganese phosphate finishes.
My opinion without proof is that someone at S&W decided to call the finish used on the Victory model revolvers "midnight black" or "military midnight black." So it was used as an internal identification term. However the process bluing chemical used was called "black magic" which was what the vendor, Hubbard-Hall, called it. In other words, revolvers had a "midnight black" finish through the use of the "black magic" chemical bluing process.
 
Last edited:
Since there are no military markings, it could also be a U.S. Maritime Commission pistol. I have one that was shipped in 1942 to the USMC and it has no military markings.

The interesting thing to me about the one I have is the forcing cone was not cut straight at the factory, the gap between the cylinder and the forcing cone is fine on the right side, and a lot bigger gap on the left. It shoots fine, but theres a noticeable flame out the left side and it’s louder than other 38 Special revolver I’ve shot.

It amazes me how it was able to leave the factory like this, or not get returned so the issue could be fixed. But, in 1942, small arms were being spit out as fast as possible.
 
Since there are no military markings, it could also be a U.S. Maritime Commission pistol. I have one that was shipped in 1942 to the USMC and it has no military markings.

The interesting thing to me about the one I have is the forcing cone was not cut straight at the factory, the gap between the cylinder and the forcing cone is fine on the right side, and a lot bigger gap on the left. It shoots fine, but theres a noticeable flame out the left side and it’s louder than other 38 Special revolver I’ve shot.

It amazes me how it was able to leave the factory like this, or not get returned so the issue could be fixed. But, in 1942, small arms were being spit out as fast as possible.

I am going to request a letter on it before I do anything too drastic. Our resident expert said it was 1942 ship date, but no cursory way to tell more since they weren't shipped numerically.

I checked this forcing cone and it looks even and close all the way around. It seems fairly tight and probably has been carried a lot more than it has been shot. It's ugly as homemade sin as it sits.

It was from an estate sale in northern Florida and we had dozens of WW2 air bases around here, but it may have been carted here through Idaho in 1960. The only extra markings are two ordnance bombs on the butt opposite the serial number.
 
I am going to request a letter on it before I do anything too drastic. Our resident expert said it was 1942 ship date, but no cursory way to tell more since they weren't shipped numerically.

I checked this forcing cone and it looks even and close all the way around. It seems fairly tight and probably has been carried a lot more than it has been shot. It's ugly as homemade sin as it sits.

It was from an estate sale in northern Florida and we had dozens of WW2 air bases around here, but it may have been carted here through Idaho in 1960. The only extra markings are two ordnance bombs on the butt opposite the serial number.

I cannot see the SN, but if it is below around V170xxx, it is likely to have been manufactured and probably shipped sometime in 1942. And if it has no property stamp it is likely to be either a DSC or a Maritime Commission gun. The former are considerably more common than the latter. In any event, it is unlikely to have been a military Victory, nearly all of which (in .38 Special) went to the U. S. Navy.
 
Last edited:
I cannot see the SN, but if it is below around V170xxx, it is likely to have been manufactured and probably shipped sometime in 1942. And if it has no property stamp it is likely to be either a DSC or a Maritime Commission gun. The former are considerably more common than the latter. In any event, it is unlikely to have been a military Victory, nearly all of which (in .38 Special) went to the U. S. Navy.

Serial is V159236...Ordnanceguy said it was 1942 in the Victory thread.
 
That would put probable shipment in the later part of '42, 4th quarter. Generally, shipping date for Victories tracks fairly closely with manufacture, i.e., they left the factory (but not always) within a few weeks or months after assembly. If an exact shipping date is needed (which it is usually not) a letter would be necessary. A DSC revolver letter will often reveal to where it shipped, such as to some law enforcement agency or to a government contractor (Boeing, Ford, DuPont, etc.). The total number of revolvers distributed through DSC was around 72K.
 
Last edited:
I picked up an excellent victory revolver that had a mismatched cylinder, barrel, and frame serial numbers, I believe an arsenal rework. Finish was so-so, I purchased it for a shooter to save my collectors. I had it locally Cerakoted to a finish that very closely matches original and makes a great shooter. Collector value was not an issue, I wanted a shooter and it really had no collector value being so mismatched.
 
Back
Top