Mcwsky09
Member
I don't doubt that tests like this were done, but the target would have to have been the densest sort of fool, a candidate for the Darwin Award. By the way, I haven't seen the Darwin Award lists for 4 or 5 years.
Seems I remember reading about the guy who invented the "Second Chance" body armor traveling around the country allowing cops, etc. to shoot him wearing the vest. If so, he fits my earlier description.
I recall seeing that as well. Had to do it himself because even with his explicit approval and waiver of any liability no officer would pull he trigger for him. I believe also heard he stopped doing that particular demo. Not that you'd need to do it more than once in today's world of YouTube and such.
And I don't think he is a candidate for the Darwin Award or even a runner up. Sure there is some risk involved but it demonstrates a confidence in your product that is hard to beat.
On an overall risk level I would think that activities such as BASE jumping or free climbing cRry a greater inherent risk in that even when everything goes right in those activities you could still be injured or killed and the smallest malfunction could be disastrous.
In the case of a live test of body armor I think I would rather pull the trigger myself than have some one else do it one handed unsupported as shown in that picture. Sure there is some risk, even a higher level if risk than a day at the range. But manageable risk. Not saying I would want that job just that it is very different than grabbing a random vest and random handgun and saying what the hell it works in the movies.