Most will carry an extra mag or two not so much for capacity but for malfunction. The mag is the semi-automatics achilles heel so to speak. 7 out of 10 malfunctions will originate from the mag.
I can't argue with this, but revolvers have failure modes, too. And when they do fail, you're most likely out of the fight permanently. I'll admit, though, the reliability advantage probably goes to the revolver.
I just went back to a revolver myself from a Glock because I could not and do not trust any auto loader. I never once got through a range session without multiple malfunctions and the last time out in a controlled environment I could not clear with the simple tap and rack.
Wow! you must have gotten a real dud of a Glock. I have about 1000 rounds through my FS9, and I've experienced one failure, and I attribute it to cheap ammo. I shoot IDPA, and I intentionally use cheap ammo in hopes that I will get an opportunity every once in a while to clear a jam under stress. So far, my M&P has not cooperated in giving me any of this type practice. It's been flawless in every one of the 7 matches I've shot.
I can moon clip reload as quick as you can with a mag.
Jerry! Jerry Miculek, I didn't know that you were on this forum.
If you can reload a revolver as quickly as you can a semi-auto, you are either a revolver prodigy (like Jerry), or you're really slow with a semi-auto. In IDPA matches, every once in a while, someone will shoot a revolver, and in every case I've seen so far, they are MUCH slower with the revolver, and this includes one guy who shoots Master class. I'm in Marksman class, which is 3 classes below Master, and I can do reloads faster with my semi-auto than the Master shooter can with his revolver. When he shoots his semi-auto, he's faster then I am. So while YOU may be as fast with a revolver, most people will not be. Most people will be much, much slower.
And if the hits are not on target doesn't mean anything how many rounds you have, spray and pray seldom works out here in the real world and if you are facing someone with a gun they are no doubt intent on stopping you as well.
You should probably do a bit more research on that real world thing. Quite often, BG's take lethal hits, but they won't cooperate in dying for another minute or two. During which time they continue to fight and shoot back. If your gun is empty, you become much less likely to survive the firefight.
Given the recent popularity of protest marches and riots, I'm working on increasing the firepower I carry around with me. I would feel WAY undergunned with a six shooter.
After my last outing with a revolver, I found that my fond recollections of revolver shooting were apparently filtered through rose colored glasses. The recoil was sharp and painful. Follow up shots were much slower than with my FS9. I guess I've gotten spoiled by the recoil characteristics of semi-autos. I'm glad I got the chance to shoot the revolver, though. It cured me of wanting to get another one.
Suffice to say, I got 50 + rounds of reload on my person and in my bag every time I leave the shack.
So you feel you need to have 50 rounds at your disposal, and a gun that only holds 6 at a time. Okaaay. That's a bit of a strange arrangement.
noone ever complains about having to much ammo.
Noone ever complains about having too many rounds in their gun either.
BTW, I carry a Kel-Tec P11, and I'm looking to get a workable holster setup for my FS9, at which point, I hope it will become my EDC.