I have no idea what I would do if that or similar situation arises.
I like the way you stated your feelings. I just want to remind you that drills, movement and such do not go as your drills do. There are always other factors that come up and your drill targets are not shooting at you.
Tossing this out for your consideration, suppose the robber has a non visual accomplice that is already in the store to cover his back. You shoot the main actor, the accomplice begins to shoot you and others. Then your drills just went out the door and you got yourself or others hurt or killed. Robbers seldom act alone. Sometimes the accomplice is the getaway driver, front man or cover. Are you prepared for that?
When I'm not carrying a full sized revolver or auto, my carry gun is a Model 36. I feel perfectly adequately armed with that gun. I'm not expecting to run into the Quds Force.I am not a police officer. My carry gun is a Model 60. I am not going to go against an armed adversary with that gun unless I am absolutely forced to. Under certain last-ditch circumstances I might intervene, but probably not.
Every civilian who legally carries a weapon should read Evan Marshall's caution against intervention at least once a month.
Commentary by Evan Marshall
This thread is not about a Pharmacist in OKC but it is about what may happen during or after a shooting, be it righteous or flawed.
A DA goes forward with his case. Just as a Grand Jury only hears the prosecution side, the DA will always have his side, even when it is in conflict with eye witness testimony. In the case of the pharmacist, the witnesses had one version and the DA had another and said the witnesses were partial, which they may have been.
Either way, a DA will make a person's life miserable. Especially so if he is anti gun or is seeking fame. The shooter may just be the person whose case elevates a DA to a Judge.
Oldman, you are right, but those who have not seen decent people ground under by an over zealous DA or cop don't get it.
In fairness to the civilians posting on here, those that have never dealt with the "Justice System" think it's about justice, common sense and it's fair. It's not, it's about politics, the attitudes of the investigators and the DA. There are those in the system who think civilians should not have guns, much less use them, thus anytime you get in a shooting they are looking to find the slightest reason to make an example of you. Even the appearance of an error is enough to get the indictment they want so they can put on their show.
The other thing being missed is, at least in NC, LEO's are required to intervene, therefore there are protections in the statues for them to do so, there are none for civilians except a good Samaritan law. The City/County/State whoever picks up the legal costs for defense, lawsuits etc for LEO's. Civilians do not have this safety net.
Now, be sure you guys consider this, this is legal fact and not subject to debate. Since you are not required to intervene, you do so under strict liability. That means you are assuming all risk, anyone hurt/killed, property damaged etc, you are on the hook for all of it, you have no legal defense. Your attorney can tell the story, but the Judge's instructions to the jury will be to consider the law only, not the story.
I am not trying to tell anyone what to do and I genuinely respect your desire to help others. You all have to do what you and hopefully the Lord, feel led to do. Just realize what you are getting yourself into.
Excellent advice, excellent article. Getting into the situation is asking for trouble, avoid it if at all possible. It's not going to end up like a movie.
I don't want you to interpret my reply as arguing with your premise. I basically agree with your point above that said: ..."In fairness to the civilians posting on here, those that have never dealt with the "Justice System" think it's about justice, common sense and it's fair. It's not, it's about politics, the attitudes of the investigators and the DA.".....
However, I would like to point out that laws regarding a private citizen's use of force in defense of others, and more importantly, the protections/exemptions those laws provide to that citizen from criminal/civil liability, can vary quite a bit from one state to the next. For example, we have some very strong statutory protections written into our laws here in MO because of lessons learned by watching cases of people in other states without those protections, and we lobbied long and hard to see those protections written into law. Additionally, jury instructions are not always congruent with the letter of the law, as we've seen here in MO in some cases.
What it amounts to, IMHO, is that when a you fire a gun at another human being even when entirely justified, there is always the possibility for a long, expensive, and stressful aftermath. And even when the law is "on your side", there is still potential for unforeseeable consequences to a persons private life and well being. This is never something that should be approached with a cavalier attitude.
What it amounts to, IMHO, is that when a you fire a gun at another human being even when entirely justified, there is always the possibility for a long, expensive, and stressful aftermath. And even when the law is "on your side", there is still potential for unforeseeable consequences to a persons private life and well being. This is never something that should be approached with a cavalier attitude.
While there are a lot of people appearing to want to shoot someone or become an instant media hero, the cost of such is often more than one can afford. It is ideal to avoid a shooting.
Stay out of it. There are too many things that can happen and most are not good.
It can become a hostage situation.
It can turn a robbery into a shooting.
It can get innocent people hurt.
There is no need to try being a hero. Be the best witness possible. Know the description, color & type shirt, what type pants, shoes, hair and anything else.
Let the police handle it.
The problem of permitees trying to become police comes up every now and then. For the most part, a permitee is allowed to carry for their personal safety and not that as a body guard for the public.
Just saying.
I don't want you to interpret my reply as arguing with your premise. I basically agree with your point above that said: ..."In fairness to the civilians posting on here, those that have never dealt with the "Justice System" think it's about justice, common sense and it's fair. It's not, it's about politics, the attitudes of the investigators and the DA.".....
However, I would like to point out that laws regarding a private citizen's use of force in defense of others, and more importantly, the protections/exemptions those laws provide to that citizen from criminal/civil liability, can vary quite a bit from one state to the next. For example, we have some very strong statutory protections written into our laws here in MO because of lessons learned by watching cases of people in other states without those protections, and we lobbied long and hard to see those protections written into law. Additionally, jury instructions are not always congruent with the letter of the law, as we've seen here in MO in some cases.
What it amounts to, IMHO, is that when a you fire a gun at another human being even when entirely justified, there is always the possibility for a long, expensive, and stressful aftermath. And even when the law is "on your side", there is still potential for unforeseeable consequences to a persons private life and well being. This is never something that should be approached with a cavalier attitude.
First, let me say I understand your reasoning as a LEO, but, when help is needed NOW, the police are only minutes away.
Before you wade into a firefight, consider this: It seems like a common assumption that the good guy, with his training, license, and good intentions, will always prevail.
Some of these bad guys may be able to outshoot you. They are not always using poor quality weapons nor poor tactics. Some have been trained by the finest military trainers and have front line combat experience. Some BGs are even wearing body armor when working. Some work in teams. Somebody outside as backup.
I am getting old, my wife has financial security, my kids are independent,and I have no military training, but I do hope to watch my grandkids grow up. If pushed, I'll fight dirty, but I would rather not fight.
You grab a hold of a BG, it might not be too easy to let go. Even the cops lose once in a while.