What do you think of rubber grips?

Gun owners like to dress up their guns like dolls

If I thought I needed rubber grips, I'd try to toughen up instead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rpg
GUYS that NEED rubber grips are wimps wimps wimps!! Well..not me of course! Got to admit they are UGLY and that molded in checkering is still a little hard on the palms a little bit...I know...I'm a wimp wimp wimp!! But those guns are pretty again when you dress 'em back up in wood...Kinda like red dresses...um...never mind! Seriously they did help on my ol 29-2... I did put the small size on it. Still got 'em too
 
I finally broke down and purchased a set of Crimson Trace LG350G for my S&W640. Killed two birds with one expensive and ugly stone. The empty cavity between the back strap in the handgrip itself is quite effective. Now, on my heirloom or dinner gun I still maintan wood, stag, or ivory.
 
Last edited:
I have shot S&W and Ruger revolvers with both wooden grips and rubber grips and I liked both. but all of the revolvers I own have rubber grips because I prefer them over wooden grips.
 
My M65 came from the factory with rubber grips in about 1995. They've been functional and held up well. I still carry this one for plain clothed duty use.

77732761.jpg
 
S&W and wooden grips just go together. If the S&W does come with rubber grips, they are replace, i.e. both my Model 659 and Model 645 just had their rubber grips replace with wooden ones.
 
I don't at all mind the stock rubber grips on my 686+.

They are hand filling, absorb recoil from the hotter magnum rounds and ensure a good grip.

Sure, wood grips are beautiful but every revolver I ever carried on the job, (Model 15, 19, 36) eventually ended up with the wood grips replaced.

When I carry a firearm which may be called upon to defend my own or the life of others, form, function, comfort and utility are what I consider beautiful...whether it's a black rifle, a stainless S&W or a Glock.

It's a tool first, an object of art a distant second. (Unless it's strictly a safe queen.)

Just my two cents.
 
I've seen all the pics posted showing rubber grips. About the only good thing I see is maybe a better grip when firing the gun. Easier to hang onto when shooting a hot load or large caliber.

That said, I think they are uglier than dirt. Put em on for shooting but, IMHO, put the wood grips back on for pictures. None of the rubber grips look good.
 
All I can add is that a lot of blued revolvers with rubber grips (that I've seen) had finish damage just under the edge. Sweat gets under them, I guess, and doesn't get wiped off, or maybe it's some chemistry other than that. Cause of that, the two I use rubbers on get the stocks removed and kroiled pretty regularly.
 
All I can add is that a lot of blued revolvers with rubber grips (that I've seen) had finish damage just under the edge. Sweat gets under them, I guess, and doesn't get wiped off, or maybe it's some chemistry other than that. Cause of that, the two I use rubbers on get the stocks removed and kroiled pretty regularly.

And here I thought rubbers were supposed to provide protection... ;)
 
This is a pic of the 629 3 inch Round butt..it has Hogues on it...but the wooden stocks are definitely much prettier..they just don't lend themselves to shooting well with the heavier mag ammo.:rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • DSCN6672.JPG
    DSCN6672.JPG
    203.8 KB · Views: 15
Hello buddies,
Here are my two S&W with their new dresses. I followed the advice of most you, and particularly P44, for one is dressed in rubber (Pachy's) when the other in wood (Nill Griffe from Germany):D
The results at the range of my attempt of making my own stock is a disaster:) but no one has been hurt:p
Friendly.
Jack
 

Attachments

  • WP_20160811_14_30_45_ProR.jpg
    WP_20160811_14_30_45_ProR.jpg
    151.6 KB · Views: 29
Last edited:
Back
Top