It sort of amuses me that when a guy posts about his favorite gun, some members jump in to tell about their choices instead of discussing what he pictured. Human nature, I guess.
I like the design, but much prefer stainless construction, hence the Model 60. But until stainless became an option, I faithfully chose the Model 36, which has been a huge success in many countries. I preferred it to nickel, although blued guns require more care. Choosing the right holster and proper care help to limit bluing loss and rust.
I must say, nickel and pearl are not my cup of tea. I'm afraid that I agree with Gen. Patton about that. But the world allows for choice, and one could sure do worse than a blued M-36.
What are the pen and the canoe-shaped knife? I gather that the other item is a cigarette case? Hmmm...never know when you might need a cigarette to get a campfire going.
Nice gun. I think it beats a Colt because the cylinder holds timing longer and the Smith is more likely to shoot to the sights without gunsmithing. I once almost failed to qualify on a USAF range when I was handed a Colt Official Police. It wouldn't group to the sights. I changed to a Victory Model S&W and still managed to achieve a Sharpshooter level.
Colts often need the barrel turned a fraction to center the sights. I was very lucky to have a New Service .45 and a SAA with 4.75-inch barrel that were exceptions, but every other Colt revolver I've owned or shot needed help. I could adjust the sights on a Trooper and three Pythons, but a Diamondback wouldn't center with all the sight adjustment used. The Colt PR woman told me to just use Kentucky windage. I haven't bought a Colt since! Their .45 autos shoot better.
What one carries is based on a variety of considerations, and if the OP likes the M-36, I'm happy for him. But I don't think it's awful to prefer a Colt or something else and say so. I do like his photo, and am a fan of good pens and good knives, too.