Texas Star
US Veteran
....one of these 'What's the best' things without filling up a page.
Too many factors, time, theater. adversary, tactics. The P-39 did VERY poorly in Europe but it was loved by pilots in the Pacific.
Even another factor. Chuck Yeager waxed an opponent with clearly superior plane then traded planes and did the same with the inferior plane. Pilot skills matter. A lot.
I don't think the P-39 was liked by any but the Russians, who used it mainly for ground attack. Why do you think it was admired in in the Pacific? From all I've read, it was pretty easy meat for Japanese fighters. Could you be thinking of the P-38, a VERY differed plane? The P-38 wasn't liked in Europe, where its lack of a cockpit heater half froze pilots at the high altitudes usually involved in air combat. In the Pacific, battle was usually lower.
Late P-38's with heaters, combat flaps and dive brakes that let them pull out of previously unrecoverable high speed dives let them perform better. Our top pilots in late P-38's could even turn inside a Zero! Both leading US aces flew P-38's. And both fought only against Japan. But late P-38's were probably deadly, even against FW-190's.
I have read Yeager's books, but can't at once recall the incident that you cited. Can you elaborate? I remember him surprising a Polish or Czech pilot in a MiG when he flew an improved F-86 and could come right up alongside the previously better climbing MiG. No actual combat was involved, just bluster. I do agree that a better pilot will often save the day, even against a better enemy plane. And I think that's all that will save us from the present Russian planes if we ever go to war. The F-22 is the bright spot, but the F-35 seems lacking. And the latest Chinese planes, modelled on Russian, are probably serious threats. I think our pilots are better. I hope... Australia operates Hornets, and I think their pilots are also probably better than most Chinese opponents. I'm deeply concerned that we may someday see war with China.
Last edited: