Yeah, I'm good with either as well, but reliability does continue to be different. While some semi-autos have become incredibly reliable, and a revolver can jam, a malfunction is still more likely to happen operating your semi auto as the MRCBF rate (mean round count between failure) is still better with a quality revolver.
When our agency switched from the deplorable Sigma to 3rd Gen Glocks, and now 4th Gen Glocks, I have to say they don't seem to fail. In all my training, qualifications, etc. etc., the only failure I have ever had could be accounted for by my own weak wristing it. Since first firing my father's J frame in the seventies as a teen ager until today, I have yet to have any revolver I have ever owned or used fail.
Here's the thing, semi autos simply have more ways to fail depending on the model. It can be out of spec ammo, shooter fatigue, sloppy grip, rubbing the slide, rubbing the bottom of the thumb safety instead of riding it (where applicable), fatigued recoil spring, lube, unseated magazine, defective magazine, the list goes on and on. There are also things that can go down with revolvers specific to the platform such as going out of timing, but the list simply pales next to an auto format and the difference in MRCBF remains significant. I'm perfectly comfortable carrying a duty Glock or a 586 L-Comp.
"In the hands of knowledgeable persons the revolver is more than an equal of any other defensive handgun." Thunder Ranch web site.
