Which 66 (No Dash) is the better gun?

Cirrus

Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
328
Reaction score
146
Hey everyone, a close family member recently passed away and I was asked if I wanted to buy some of his guns. He had two 4" 66 (no dash) guns and since I already have a 2.5" (no dash), I thought a 4" would make a nice addition to my collection. Unfortunately, neither of the 4" guns appear to be all original and there appears to be some issues or discrepancies with each one, so I'm not entirely sure which would be the better choice. Neither gun appears to have been fired much at all. There's zero flame cutting on the underside of the top strap and forcing cones both look great. I'll be getting a "family discount" so price really isn't a factor. And I certainly would not be reselling once I decide which one to purchase, I'm just confused about which one I should buy.

The first one is an early all-stainless rear sight version, SN 4K564XX. I has some wear marks in front of the cylinder on both sides and then on the right side has some scratches on the side plate. It has also been ported on top of the barrel at some point, but no idea where it was done or how long ago.

IMG_3675.webp
IMG_3677.webp
IMG_3681.webp
IMG_3678.webp
IMG_3676.webp

The second one is also an early all-stainless rear sight, SN 4K562XX. The blade of the rear sight appears to have been swapped with a black one with a white outlined notch and also looks like it was dropped and hit a corner, so I don't believe that's original. And the front sight has a red ramp insert that also does not appear to be original. The insert is more pink that red and translucent like a piece of fiber optic. It's not a solid color like red or orange that's normally seen on revolvers. This gun is in better cosmetic condition, but the trigger also appears slightly different than other gun. It's not as flat on the sides and appears to be contoured and polished more.

IMG_3683.webp

IMG_3685.webp
IMG_3686.webp

IMG_3684.webp
IMG_3688.webp
 
Register to hide this ad
First gun looks like real Magnaporting which is a reputable outfit.
Looks like its trigger has been rounded off a bit, Magnaport also does action work. See below.

Second gun has had the trigger rounded off for double action comfort.
I would wonder about what might have been done to the action inside. Check for push-off of an overly lightened SA, check for misfires from an overly reduced mainspring, check for sluggish trigger return from an overly reduced rebound spring.
The front sight insert looks ok, obviously needs a replacement rear sight blade.
 
Buy both and shoot the them. That is what they were made for.
I wish I could, but there's another family member that wants to buy the other one. They know I'm the "gun guy" so they're letting me have first pick between the two and they're going to buy the other one.
 
First gun looks like real Magnaporting which is a reputable outfit.
Looks like its trigger has been rounded off a bit, Magnaport also does action work. See below.

Second gun has had the trigger rounded off for double action comfort.
I would wonder about what might have been done to the action inside. Check for push-off of an overly lightened SA, check for misfires from an overly reduced mainspring, check for sluggish trigger return from an overly reduced rebound spring.
The front sight insert looks ok, obviously needs a replacement rear sight blade.
First one trigger breaks at 3.5lbs SA every time.
Second one trigger breaks at 2lbs SA exactly every time.

The second one is actually a earlier serial number. Was it common for this model to have different front sights (solid front sight and ramp notch cut front sight).
 
Id swap rear site units and take the one without the porting.
Id be surprised (shocked) if that red ramp shipped from the factory,
Many complained about the early 66 ss on ss sites.
Btw neither of those stocks sets are factory, some sorta Thailand knock offs.
Any other SW revolvers besides those two that are on the table that you can choose or thats it ?
 
Aftermarket, Thai?, stocks on both. Polished triggers. FWIW, I sent my "2K" model 66 in for overhaul in '80; most everything except frame and side plate, to include the barrel, was replaced. It came back from S&W with a red ramp front sight, so perhaps on a 4K gun the RR is factory? Not being able to examine breech face, possible forcing cone erosion, B/C gap, end play, etc., don't know which I'd pick...
 
Id swap rear site units and take the one without the porting.
Id be surprised (shocked) if that red ramp shipped from the factory,
Many complained about the early 66 ss on ss sites.
Btw neither of those stocks sets are factory, some sorta Thailand knock offs.
Any other SW revolvers besides those two that are on the table that you can choose or thats it ?
No, those are the only ones. Everything else was just average polymer guns and rifles.
 
I'd vote door # 2. I do not like the porting. As far as the red ramp, it may have fallen out. I purchase a 66 once and the RR fell out at the gun show. I had it replaced and the smith used an old plastic toothbrush for material. I couldn't tell much difference in my (at the time) 6 model 66s.
 
I would try and swap the rear sights. Unless somebody knows somewhere I haven't found, it's impossible to get a stainless replacement blade and screw. I've got 2 stainless rear sights and both have been gutted. Looks wrong with a blue blade but a blue blade seems to be the only alternative
 
Looks to me like the barrel was replaced on #2. There's no pin holding the front sight blade on and you post clear pictures of both sides of the front sight.
I can see the pin in both the left and right sides you posted for #1
 
First gun's stocks don't look like factory S&W targets. The checkering is too far back, the escutcheon screw should center in the checkering. 2nd gun has stocks from the early '80s, the full speed loader cut didn't appear until around 1980. I don't like ported guns, and I don't like sights that have been dropped on. Unless you just want a shooter I'd pass on both of them. If you want a shooter, take the ported one. Both have had the trigger grooves removed and the triggers polished smooth.
 
Looks to me like the barrel was replaced on #2. There's no pin holding the front sight blade on and you post clear pictures of both sides of the front sight.
I can see the pin in both the left and right sides you posted for #1

Sometimes the fs blade pin is easy to spot, sometimes near impossible.
I think the one on gun #2 is just hard to detect or am I imagining I see a hint of it?
But that blade insert is definitely not original IMO.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20250818_230438_Samsung Internet.webp
    Screenshot_20250818_230438_Samsung Internet.webp
    199 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Either gun will clean up nicely. If I had to pick one it would be number 2 and I source a new rear sight. If the price is right grab both. I bought a no dash a few months ago and other than a good cleaning (it was swimming in oil) it was fairly clean. I love them.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0057.webp
    IMG_0057.webp
    653.4 KB · Views: 0
Back
Top