- Joined
- Dec 2, 2012
- Messages
- 3,347
- Reaction score
- 5,573
442, 60-15, 3913.
All are very reliable.
All are very reliable.
I find that a revolver is actually harder to use for "any skill level". Between the small black sights and the trigger pull ifs harder to hit accurately. I have proven that twice by letting my father and sister shoot my revolvers. Having never shot one neither of them could consistently hit the target at any range except point blank. Even at 10 ft away the shots were all over the place with the first few being close but complete misses. When switching over to semi autos they were not able to get any kind of groupings but we're able to consistently hit the chest and stomach area with only an occasional flyer.
Semi autos can sit loaded indefinitely as well, have better sights and triggers.
My carry guns have to have night sights. A revolver in the dark is not a good idea. And be reliable. I carry Glocks and HKs.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
75% of the lead of the 12 ga, a significant amount less. A 20 ga can't do everything a 12 ga can. Also, with proper fit and stance, follow up shots should not be an issue either regarding muzzle rise.
Seriouslly??? You'd ask for the ammo to be replaced?![]()
Yes, because in my county people who shot dogs attacking livestock were compensated for the livestock and the ammo used by the dog owner. I might not get it, a lot depends on the deputy involved but I'd sure ask.
I knew you meant it, but some folks who've lived primarily in urban areas wouldn't.
![]()
75% of the lead is not a substantial loss. That's analogous to the difference between a .45 JHP and a .40 JHP. In either case, placement is going to be king. Any way you slice it, a 40% increase in recoil is going to be noticeable and substantial--that's analogous to the recoil difference between a steel K frame .38 and a J frame airweight. (Firing the same load.)
I knew you meant it, but some folks who've lived primarily in urban areas wouldn't.
![]()