We have the 9mm shield and we love it. I need one for myself. Female and 51 years old and I'm wanting to carry and for home defense. Would like to know if the performance shield 9mm is worth the extra money for what I'm needing it for. If you have a performance please give me your experience with the performance shield. Trying to decide what would be better the performance shield FO or the performance shield with night sights.
Which to purchase for defense... Shield or performance??
- Thread starter Emalone5
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Sunsetview45
Member
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2016
- Messages
- 111
- Reaction score
- 189
I bought the M&P Shield 9mm about 4 weeks ago for both purposes. I am 60yr old and female. I did a lot of research on this forum and the web first. I went to my local gun range and tried out a little of everything the M&P was the best for me. Good luck with your hunt and have fun!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not familiar with the shield performance. I do have a full size 9 Performance that I love but not a carry gun. For what you are going to use it for I wouldn't spend the extra cash. I would buy what feels good in my hands and what I shoot best. If you like the night sights you can add them on. Hit the range and shoot a few other makes too! you never know what is best for you until you shoot a few!!
bigwheelzip
Absent Comrade
The visibility of the two sights depends on the available light they are used in. More light, FO, less, night.
For a civilian carry, it's important to practice point shooting, because if you need to deploy your gun, it will probably be in a hurry at short range, and having time for carefully aimed fire is unsure.
coachray
Member
I have a shield 9mm but not a PC so I can't comment on that, but I bought my shield with trijicon night sights. I think most bad things happen at night and I personally would not be able to see the sights if someone broke in my house at night, even with a flashlight.
Ranger17
Member
I have the Shield PC w/ FO and love it. 400+ rounds so far and its been perfect. I've been able to use the sights in a darker indoor range ok (and if it comes up in discussion due to the PC's porting, any muzzle flash has not been a problem for me either).
Can't compare it to a regular Shield, though I let a range officer try it (he carries a Shield at times) and he thought the trigger was nicer than his stock version and the muzzle flip was less as well for a quicker follow up shot. He too didnt notice any flash while watching me shoot it, that would concern him anyhow.
If it means anything, my wife on occasion hits the range with me and has shot my compact and full size MP's fine for one who rarely shoots. But she prefers to plink with the .22's instead. The first time she tried the PC Shield? After the mag went empty she asked if she could shoot it again. So for her, that said something.
Back on track, I personally like the FO sights but that's just me. Never had a gun with night sights, a laser, etc....
If i am ever in a situation that is so dark the sights aren't of any help, I either would be point shooting or if the target is hard to see as well, likely wouldn't be firing in the first place. Just my .02 of course as there are many variables in that conversation.
Can't compare it to a regular Shield, though I let a range officer try it (he carries a Shield at times) and he thought the trigger was nicer than his stock version and the muzzle flip was less as well for a quicker follow up shot. He too didnt notice any flash while watching me shoot it, that would concern him anyhow.
If it means anything, my wife on occasion hits the range with me and has shot my compact and full size MP's fine for one who rarely shoots. But she prefers to plink with the .22's instead. The first time she tried the PC Shield? After the mag went empty she asked if she could shoot it again. So for her, that said something.
Back on track, I personally like the FO sights but that's just me. Never had a gun with night sights, a laser, etc....
If i am ever in a situation that is so dark the sights aren't of any help, I either would be point shooting or if the target is hard to see as well, likely wouldn't be firing in the first place. Just my .02 of course as there are many variables in that conversation.
Ranger17
Member
yeah she does lol, but a range trip for me can be 100-150+ rounds thru anything I take so I clean them anyhow when done. I do have some wipes i'll carry with me, in case i intend to do some real serious round counts i can give it a quick wipe down and even run the boresnake thru it if needed. But i have yet to have any issues just shooting it until i'm done.
Just not sure about the ported barrel and the FO. That's why I'm thinking about the original 9mm shield and not getting the performance shield with FO. Some folks like the ported barrel and some sure don't care for it at all. Still thinking on which one to purchase. 
Ranger17
Member
Just not sure about the ported barrel and the FO. That's why I'm thinking about the original 9mm shield and not getting the performance shield with FO. Some folks like the ported barrel and some sure don't care for it at all. Still thinking on which one to purchase.
Perhaps, if you both like the standard Shield you already have, then just go with another similar model. Keeps consistency between the 2 guns if that has any importance to both of you.
Having a original 9mm shield and to purchase a new performance shield might be the answer. It's just the one I purchase will be the one I carry for myself. Still just not sure if the performance is worth the extra money.
Last edited:
For self defense purposes it matters not what the weapon looks like....only that the projectile exiting the barrel finds it target.
The performance center versions of Shields will in no way make that happen any better than the non performance center versions.
Yes they have more eye candy appeal but functionally not much difference.
And yes when the performance center Shield 45 is introduced I will trade in my current Shield 45 for that version and yes I only use mine for self defense cc.
Everything clear now ???????
The performance center versions of Shields will in no way make that happen any better than the non performance center versions.
Yes they have more eye candy appeal but functionally not much difference.
And yes when the performance center Shield 45 is introduced I will trade in my current Shield 45 for that version and yes I only use mine for self defense cc.
Everything clear now ???????
jstanfield103
Member
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2009
- Messages
- 698
- Reaction score
- 323
I just bought the PC Shield because of the looks of it. I will comment on the internals of the slide and barrel exterior getting very dirty very quickly due to the porting. It also dirties the sights up a lot faster. You will definitely have to bring a cloth or some wipes to the range to wipe it down while shooting. As far as muzzle flip, I find that there is very little difference between the 2 models.
I really like the trigger on my PC model over my Shield 45 standard model. I can see myself one day buying another barrel (Non-Ported) for my PC Shield. Just to cut down on the dirt inside the slide and on the front sight while shooting.
Either model are an excellent choice. Good Luck on you're decision.
Just my 2 cents on the difference
I really like the trigger on my PC model over my Shield 45 standard model. I can see myself one day buying another barrel (Non-Ported) for my PC Shield. Just to cut down on the dirt inside the slide and on the front sight while shooting.
Either model are an excellent choice. Good Luck on you're decision.
Just my 2 cents on the difference
srderb
Member
I had a Shield that I bought for my wife and loved so decided to get my own. Read everything I could, videos etc...on the PC Shield. Ended up with regular Shield but installed Apex trigger and Trijicon HD sighs. I think this is a better setup. Trijicons are not cheap but great sight for day or night. I don't like the Hi Vis sights on the PC. And I think most would say Apex better than the PC trigger. Ended up costing me a little more but like I said, I think it's a better setup.
You do know that for about 30-40 bucks more you can get the Shield 45 in the just about the same footprint as the 9.....
Sorry...I just love the Shield 45...if you want the 9 yeah go for it.
swkohnle08
Member
I have a Sig Sauer 226 Elite in .40 S&W and Beretta F96 in .40 S&W that I love shooting and I just bought my first 9mm M&P Shield and love this gun. It shoots well, accurate and a sweet gun. It is my EDC. I think you will like the Shield.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
JJEH
Member
I would not want to shoot a ported handgun in low light condition and/or close range.
Ported guns are for range and hunting only IMO.
Buy a regular gun that you like and put some good sights on it. Spend more money rather on ammo and range than fancy options...
Ported guns are for range and hunting only IMO.
Buy a regular gun that you like and put some good sights on it. Spend more money rather on ammo and range than fancy options...
Last edited:
It's amazing how often this myth gets repeated by otherwise knowledgeable gun folks. Ports do not noticeably increase muzzle flash with quality self-defense ammo which uses low flash powder. What ports will do is help decrease muzzle rise thus helping the shooter control any follow up shots. Therefore ported guns are absolutely usable in self-defense situations.
Whether you need to spend more on a ported gun is up to you, OP, but don't let internut myths dissuade you from going for the PC version. I'd recommend renting them at your local range if you can and see which you like better.
