Which Would You Carry: SW99 in 40, SW99 in 9, or.....???

I like .40 -- got a 4006TSW CHP in memory of my best friend who was a CHIP (although he carried a Python); a 4046, the aforementioned SW99s, a Sig 226 and somewhere along the line I picked up a Taurus 940, which isn't a bad little (okay, semi-midsized) gun.
Except I'm in love with my 9mm smaller 3rd Gen S&Ws the 40 would be a strong carry contender. Well, but so it my CS45 and 4513TSW.
Too many choices. It was a lot easier when the choice of self defense weapons was either a big rock or stout stick...or a good pair of sneakers.
 
I’ll take the .40 S&W over the 9mm any day. I like the 9mm, but the .40 is a better choice, for me. .40 S&W dead….not by a long shot!

they said the same about 10mm years ago. Now there are more than back when they were "popular"
 
For those that may be interested, Centerfire is blowing out some LE SW99 .40 magazines - Used S&W SW99 .40 Cal 12 Round Magazines | Centerfire Systems

Just FYI, back when S&W engineers were trying to figure out why some SW9940's would experience early-slide lock (slide lock with rounds remaining in the mags), they discovered that the magazine body sometimes allowed some lateral movement of rounds rising up toward the top of the magazine during recoil. If the nose of one of the rounds wiggled too far to the left, it would sometimes engage the inside tab of the slide stop, lifting it and locking the slide open.

FWIW, we were told this was also something sometimes reported with early P99's chambered in .40 S&W.

We were told (in SW99/P99 armorer classes) that S&W was working on why it sometimes happened, and studied a range of possible factors. They finally decided they'd figured out the problem.

We were finally told in an armorer recert that S&W had sent the data they'd developed (via high-speed imaging of round stack movement under recoil) to Walther, and Walther worked with their magazine vendor (Mec-Gar?) to address the issue. The result was changing the shape of the magazine body, on the left side, behind the magazine window where the slide stop tab engaged the follower, and the left side of the follower (of course, to conform to the new indentation of the mag body at that spot). The narrowing of the magazine body at that spot was found to prevent excessive lateral wiggle of the rising rounds as they rose up past the slide stop lever's inside tab, preventing them from nudging and lifting the slide stop.

When S&W started receiving the revised magazines, they offered them as replacements for the original .40 mags to their LE customer agencies. I remember hearing they'd also sent them to customers if they reported early slide-lock issues in their SW9940's.

Here's a picture of the two magazine body & follower designs. The original SW9940 mag is on the right side, and the revised magazine is on the left. The revision difference is pretty easy to see on the magazine body. The orange color for S&W models was changed from a light orange to a darker orange to identify the revision. If I remember right, Walther revised their blue .40 follower color, going from light blue to a darker blue.

 
I own a full-size SW9940 and a compact SW999C (9mm). I carried a similar full-size SW9940 on duty for a few years.

I put a few tens of thousands of rounds through various SW9940's back in those days, and I still take my own to a LEOSA qual range now and again.

My SW999C has seen upwards of maybe 17K rounds fired.

I rather like both of them, but that's because they're of the original "Anti-Stress" action. Personally, I never cared for the 990L (think Walther P99 QA, or Quick Action, but without the field-stripping button to release the striker).

Then only SW9945 I ever handled was one the factory sent us for T&E. I found it a bit tall in the grip frame, and the cycling was slow and ... 'sproingy". As much as I was an avid .45ACP owner and shooter, I just couldn't work up the interest to order one. Accurate, and the DA/SA trigger modes were acceptable ... but it just felt ungainly in my hand. Oh well, different strokes, right? :)
 
S&W SW99 QA

I liked our dept's .40 S&W. The .45 is potentially too heavy which can make for over penetration. In the same way if the 9mm is too light you may not get enough penetration. The CT State police shot a guy 19 times and didn't take him down until he was shot with 2 12GA slugs from the shotgun.
My SW99 QA is a paperweight if I don't get a couple magazines for it.
 
So don't.



No such thing as too much of a good thing. Apparently you don't need the cash they represent and it's unlikely they'll ever go down in value.

Pick a couple for your "carry rotation" and change it up over time.

My only thought on which to carry would be that I'd tend towards the most easily replaceable firearms. You list a number of guns I wouldn't want to lose to an evidence room.

This ^^^^^^^! If you are smart.

Rick H.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top