Why one cop carries 145 rounds on duty

Register to hide this ad
I wonder why he chose to drop the .45, and switch to 9mm. It was a good read, thanks for posting it. Ed.
 
IMPOSIBLE! After all doesn't he know that you're supposed to fall over when hit with one 45acp?

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
And I thought I carried too much ammo with my 10 rounds in two revolvers and 4 speed loaders. But I am not a police officer so hopefully something like that won't happen to me.:eek:
 
I wonder why he chose to drop the .45, and switch to 9mm. It was a good read, thanks for posting it. Ed.

Most likely because a stock Glock 17 magazine holds 17 rounds while a stock Glock 21 mag only holds 13, plus you can carry 33 round Glock 9mm factory mags as backup. Looks like he's made the decision, after pumping that guy full of .45 ACP and watching him carry on the fight, that greater ammo capacity is more important to him than caliber.

Good read btw.
 
Last edited:
My department issue was a S&W model 10 (six shooter) and a dump pouch that held six additional rounds. Times have changed! The job is much more difficult and dangerous than when I was on!
 
The change to a 9mm was probably a department decision and not a personal one.

This is a freaky story. I've never heard of an assailant as determined as this one.
 
If I recall correctly, it was his decision, not the department's. If one looks at all the available info from legit ammo testing (calibrated gel, etc) like that from Doctor Roberts, there is no significant difference in performance between good rounds in standard service calibers (9mm, 40, 45ACP, .357Sig). Ease of shooting (well), far lower cost of ammo for more practice, ability to carry more are all tipping the default recommendation to 9mm.

One trainer's explanation of this can be found in SWAT magazine (July 2012, as I recall): "Putting Down the Man Gun: Why I Switched from .45 to 9mm." - Pat Rogers. The people I know who have shot someone with a pistol have been satisfied with the 9mm, as long as they: put the bullets where the should be; used quality ammo that meets the standard; and kept shooting until the offender went down (shoot 'em to the ground). Not a lot of assailants are that determined, but they are out there and have to be part of one's consideration.
 
Most likely because a stock Glock 17 magazine holds 17 rounds while a stock Glock 22 mag only holds 13, plus you can carry 33 round Glock 9mm factory mags as backup. Looks like he's made the decision, after pumping that guy full of .45 ACP and watching him carry on the fight, that greater ammo capacity is more important to him than caliber.

Good read btw.

Just a correction, the Glock 22 magazine holds 15 rounds and there is a 22 rounder available.
....Now that I read the story, he was using a Glock 21 with 13 rounders. I carry a Glock 22 when working in Camden with two extra magazines.

That gives me 46 rounds in my main gun and 11 more in my backup gun. 55 rounds total.
 
Last edited:
Just a correction, the Glock 22 magazine holds 15 rounds and there is a 22 rounder available.
....Now that I read the story, he was using a Glock 21 with 13 rounders. I carry a Glock 22 when working in Camden with two extra magazines.

That gives me 46 rounds in my main gun and 11 more in my backup gun. 55 rounds total.

We carry standard Glock 21s with the 13 round mags, we are not allowed (only the chief knows why) to carry a secondary or back up, BUT there are some guys who carry 4 + 13 round mags on their person.
 
I have read that story before. It is freakishly scary.
I am so glad that LEOs do what they do, and I don't have to.
 
I had a friend Sf & SOG....he was putting his carry weapon away it was a Glock 40.I asked why he was carring a 40 & not a 9mm.He said,I've seen what a 9 does first hand....many times.....I want to put the the biggest round I can.... accurately....at the bad guy!I like the 40! I have to bow to experience....his job was to hunt & kill the bad guys for a # of yrs...it wasn't what he read or from gel.tests it was from real life!SEALS like the 9 but Chris Kyle liked the 45. So I guess it depends on what YOU feel comfortable with!!
Jim
 
The change to a 9mm was probably a department decision and not a personal one.

This is a freaky story. I've never heard of an assailant as determined as this one.

I've no intention engaging in a caliber war. I learned to shoot pistol with a 1911, carried one for years. Still at the top of my "If I could only have one" list. That said, the story affirms that no handgun round is 100% effective all the time, not even a 45acp. Frank Gusenberg, one of the St. Valentine's Day massacre victims, was hit 17 times with 45acp point blank from a Thompson SMG. When the authorities got there, he was still alive, crawling toward the door. He expired later that day, but still had enough gas to hang on several hours.
 
We carry standard Glock 21s with the 13 round mags, we are not allowed (only the chief knows why) to carry a secondary or back up, BUT there are some guys who carry 4 + 13 round mags on their person.

*
There are a lot of reasons given when such policies are encountered. All of them are clownshoes at best, and arguably dereliction or worse. There ought to be a safety grievance filed daily by every officer in the department, along with a complaint to your state workplace safety agency.
 
I am always reminded of a guy named Alf Diamond, he gave me my first tattoo when I was stationed in Germany. He had been shot eleven times in one battle during his time in the FFL. while fighting in Vietnam.
 
Back
Top