'You're An Unbelievably Stupid Man, Aren't You
- Thread starter peyton
- Start date
Pointshoot
Member
Glad to hear it ! I'm a Lifetime NRA member, and also a member of Gunowners of America. I like GOA's no compromise attitude.
I'm also a member of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO). I'm not Jewish - and you don't have to be to join. I like the fact that these folks know history and what has happened to people in many times & places who were disarmed, including law abiding Jews in Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. Its tough for antis to call such folks 'paranoid', given the history.
This is the underlying reason for the 2nd Amendment, not for personal self defense against common criminals or for hunting/sporting uses. I know the majority here probably know that - - - -but perhaps we've been shy about saying so in the past. We didn't want to have a 'tin foil hat wearer' label put on us. We didn't want to be embarrassed.
Well do a little independent research on the National Defense Authorization Act which enables those in the federal executive branch to imprison or kill people without evidence or trial, or even the 'target's' family knowing what happened to their loved one. Research the push to put police & troops in more places including bus & train stations and on the roads. Look at the push to put drones over the skies of America, just like in overseas war zones. Don't take anyone else's word for it . . . . check out all these things for yourself. If after doing so, youre not a little bit 'concerned' about what's happening in your country . . . .
"When the government fears the people, there is Liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny." - - - - Thomas Jefferson
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 1
TV hosts and Politcal parties
It seems to me that tv host are like politcal parties. They do things like enforce stricter gun control because they want the common public to be on their side. Why? We all know why, to get better tv ratings and the political people do it to get the public votes. Everyone knows strict gun laws won't do anything but weaken the none military citizens defense against Federal take over or in the event of an actual invasion, render us helpless so be it, having to succumb to the militay laws in the state of Marshall Law. There is no reason to ban assult rifles in the US. Wouldn't it be much better to have a mental backround check included in all backround checks and a drug test? I'd rather have to go through that than eventually have our rights to bear arms taken away, which is where all this beurocrattic rubbish is leading to. The young man that killed the unfortunate childern was mental. My personal answer to a re enforcement of gun control would be that everyone that buys a new gun should show PROOF of purchase of a declared heavy duty SAFE to keep the firearms in. We all also know that it won't keep the street gangs arrested in their activities but at least they will have a hell of a time getting your guns. The mother of the guy who did the shooting, more than likely had her guns in an unsafe place in order for her son to be able to get them. He had a mental problem, WHY ON EARTH were her guns available for him to get?? Anyway, I'm sure everyone thought of all this but I think the Gun Safe thing would be an effective plan on keeping the guns (the ones that aren't stolen yet) off the streets. What else can be done? Stricter gun laws won't do **** angaisnt crime but leave us law biding citizens open to being victims ourselves. I was robbed two years ago and we lost the TV that belonged to our son that was killed in an accident and our first thought was, we better get a safe so they don't get our guns. Home invasions are notorious in our area and a gun of some sort is readily handy at all times when we're home but when we're not home, we feel much better knowing that the common street druggie isn't going to take much time on trying to cut into our safe....Hopefully the picture will be added here, if not, I apologize. It's not the best safe but it's a big deterent, along with the dogs....Please excuse the spelling!
It seems to me that tv host are like politcal parties. They do things like enforce stricter gun control because they want the common public to be on their side. Why? We all know why, to get better tv ratings and the political people do it to get the public votes. Everyone knows strict gun laws won't do anything but weaken the none military citizens defense against Federal take over or in the event of an actual invasion, render us helpless so be it, having to succumb to the militay laws in the state of Marshall Law. There is no reason to ban assult rifles in the US. Wouldn't it be much better to have a mental backround check included in all backround checks and a drug test? I'd rather have to go through that than eventually have our rights to bear arms taken away, which is where all this beurocrattic rubbish is leading to. The young man that killed the unfortunate childern was mental. My personal answer to a re enforcement of gun control would be that everyone that buys a new gun should show PROOF of purchase of a declared heavy duty SAFE to keep the firearms in. We all also know that it won't keep the street gangs arrested in their activities but at least they will have a hell of a time getting your guns. The mother of the guy who did the shooting, more than likely had her guns in an unsafe place in order for her son to be able to get them. He had a mental problem, WHY ON EARTH were her guns available for him to get?? Anyway, I'm sure everyone thought of all this but I think the Gun Safe thing would be an effective plan on keeping the guns (the ones that aren't stolen yet) off the streets. What else can be done? Stricter gun laws won't do **** angaisnt crime but leave us law biding citizens open to being victims ourselves. I was robbed two years ago and we lost the TV that belonged to our son that was killed in an accident and our first thought was, we better get a safe so they don't get our guns. Home invasions are notorious in our area and a gun of some sort is readily handy at all times when we're home but when we're not home, we feel much better knowing that the common street druggie isn't going to take much time on trying to cut into our safe....Hopefully the picture will be added here, if not, I apologize. It's not the best safe but it's a big deterent, along with the dogs....Please excuse the spelling!
Attachments
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2012
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 1
s1mp13m4n
Member
I am a Top Gear fan and Jeremy Clarkson punched Morgan over a dispute.
Jeremy Clarkson interview - Parkinson - BBC - YouTube
Jeremy Clarkson interview - Parkinson - BBC - YouTube
Pointshoot
Member
No Guns - - - I appreciate your comments & agree with some of it, but not with other parts of it.
First of all, there is no gun 'problem'. What took place was tragic. But these are highly unlikely events. I did some checking awhile back after Columbine, and you or your child are far more likely to be hit by lightening than such a school shooting. If one looks up the probabilities of various causes of deaths including bathroom falls, bathtub drownings, fires from poor electrical wiring - - - - they are far greater than being caught in a school shooting or in a hijacked airplane. One of the greatest dangers causing deaths in the country are auto accidents. About 27 school children each year are killed while riding a school bus.
What is common among these mass shootings (given that they are rare, unlikely events) is that the shooters have usually been taking psychiatric drugs and were under psychiatric care. These drugs can increase the odds of suicidal and violent behavior. This is what should be looked into.
Also the "No Gun Zone" laws are stupid and help such events happen. In places like Israel & Switzerland where the citizens are armed, their school yards are safer. Places where American citizens carry concealed are safer than no gun zone cities like Chicago and NYC.
Those who push the anti 2A agenda know that most people are moved by emotions rather than the facts and logic. When we 'compromise' and give into that which doesn't impact the issue at all (childrens safety) - - - - it only encourages the antis to come back for more.
The antis don't care about safety. Elements in the executive branch & ATF did their program "Fast & Furious" which smuggled guns into Mexico so that any harm and deaths could be blamed on the 2nd Amendment. They were found out on this. It got little media coverage, of course.
They want to disarm all of us. Dont be fooled or swayed by the hyped emotionalism.
First of all, there is no gun 'problem'. What took place was tragic. But these are highly unlikely events. I did some checking awhile back after Columbine, and you or your child are far more likely to be hit by lightening than such a school shooting. If one looks up the probabilities of various causes of deaths including bathroom falls, bathtub drownings, fires from poor electrical wiring - - - - they are far greater than being caught in a school shooting or in a hijacked airplane. One of the greatest dangers causing deaths in the country are auto accidents. About 27 school children each year are killed while riding a school bus.
What is common among these mass shootings (given that they are rare, unlikely events) is that the shooters have usually been taking psychiatric drugs and were under psychiatric care. These drugs can increase the odds of suicidal and violent behavior. This is what should be looked into.
Also the "No Gun Zone" laws are stupid and help such events happen. In places like Israel & Switzerland where the citizens are armed, their school yards are safer. Places where American citizens carry concealed are safer than no gun zone cities like Chicago and NYC.
Those who push the anti 2A agenda know that most people are moved by emotions rather than the facts and logic. When we 'compromise' and give into that which doesn't impact the issue at all (childrens safety) - - - - it only encourages the antis to come back for more.
The antis don't care about safety. Elements in the executive branch & ATF did their program "Fast & Furious" which smuggled guns into Mexico so that any harm and deaths could be blamed on the 2nd Amendment. They were found out on this. It got little media coverage, of course.
They want to disarm all of us. Dont be fooled or swayed by the hyped emotionalism.
Last edited:
mstuhr
Member
other post
I think there is a thread going about "Happy things".
This does it for me.
Clarkson broke a finger. I'd have liked to see him break both hands and wear out a new pair of Redwings on Morgan.
Sometime folks get what they ask for.
Thanks
Mike
I think there is a thread going about "Happy things".
This does it for me.
Clarkson broke a finger. I'd have liked to see him break both hands and wear out a new pair of Redwings on Morgan.
Sometime folks get what they ask for.
Thanks
Mike
Where is that facepalm smiley when we need it?
S&WIowegan
US Veteran
A few years ago I worked on a large financing for a UK headquartered armored car company. They operate all 'round the world including various third world countries. I asked the CEO what country was the most dangerous? Answer: The UK because the drivers are not allowed to be armed. All the third world "citizens" of the UK know this full well. The robbers sneak up on the drivers and bash them on the head with a bat! I said I hoped it was permitted to give the drivers a ****** HELMET!
This is the type of absurdity that evolves once the *** sister, do-gooders convince the mindless boobies like Piers Morgan that it's a better result to bash the driver than have him defend himself with a firearm.
The same people will tell you with a pure heart they prefer more useless anti-gun laws over exposing innocent children to the horror of armed guards. I find myself so astonished by this type of thinking I almost go apoplectic.
This is the type of absurdity that evolves once the *** sister, do-gooders convince the mindless boobies like Piers Morgan that it's a better result to bash the driver than have him defend himself with a firearm.
The same people will tell you with a pure heart they prefer more useless anti-gun laws over exposing innocent children to the horror of armed guards. I find myself so astonished by this type of thinking I almost go apoplectic.
s1mp13m4n
Member
This is just for fun, TopGear doing what they do best, goof off. This was the way they got revenge on The Stig after he left the show. You could substitute Morgan for the Stig, just sayin'. Lol
Top Gear US Special - Drive-By Shooting - YouTube
Top Gear US Special - Drive-By Shooting - YouTube
Similar threads
