• Update – 12:30 PM EST
    Attachments are now working, and all members can once again upload files.
    We are currently testing URL redirects and other miscellaneous features across the site.
    Thank you for your continued patience and support during this migration.

    Prefer a darker look? You can switch between light and dark modes in your account settings:
    smith-wessonforum.com/account/preferences

Strap or no strap?

BabaBlueJay

Well-known member
Bronze Supporter
Joined
Aug 31, 2021
Messages
802
Reaction score
1,478
Location
Ohio
I am torn over what to do with my next holster. On the one hand, I hate the idea of having to remove a strap to draw my revolver, on the other hand I hate the idea of it flying out of my holster if I ever need to sprint with it. My Galco Outdoorsman strap annoyed me so much that I cut it off. The problem is as expected, a holster designed to have a strap now is not secure to run with. I tested it empty sprinting across my backyard and the gun flew out of the holster like a rocket which clearly is not safe. The good news is I wanted to replace my Galco with something nicer anyways, but now I want to be sure if I spend a ton on a Milt Sparks or other strapless holster that it will keep the gun in place even if I am sprinting away from or towards a threat to protect my family and I.

Some people say they just won't run with a holster on, but I don't want to be limited to "just don't run then" I carry a heavy 686 L frame in OWB holsters and want to be able to do almost ANYTHING securely with it. Limitations are not acceptable if I am going to shell out 200+ dollars on a top notch holster.

My question is essentially this, is there ANY strapless holster that will keep my revolver from flying out in extreme conditions like sprinting or climbing a wall, or ANY extreme activity that may be necessary in an emergency situation. Or do I just have to have a strap to ensure the revolver is secure if I want it to stay put under those extreme circumstances.

Thanks in advance!
 
IMO a strap is simply another impediment in the unlikely event I’ll need to draw my firearm. We all have to make our own choices, your everyday lifestyle may be more conducive to carrying a revolver in a holster with a strap? I don’t even like manual safeties on my CCW, much less a retaining strap.

You may want to look into a kydex revolver holster with solid retention (I’m thinking something like Safariland).
 
Last edited:
Yes, there are many revolver holsters made to retain them without a strap or thumb break. They can hold it in place via the cylinder or trigger guard (the latter is very common with semi-auto pistols). Best to ask the holster maker before purchasing in any case.
 
The open top holster is referred to as speed holster. The reason is that it
is much faster. I would never carry a concealed gun with a retention strap
on it. When I need to get my gun out, it would probably be in a hurry.
A worthwhile goal is to draw and fire in less than a heartbeat. That is
approximately one second. I used to be able to do that, but not anymore.
 
I am a no-strap kind of guy. I am now WAY retired and old enough I am not going to be wrestling with bad guys or breaking up a fight between two teenage boys (or girls) throwing fists at each other. I am happy with a snug-fitting concealed holster. That being said I find myself, out of force of habit, pushing my thumb down on a strap that isn't there when I am working on my draw-presentation.
 
You have to look around, but there are holsters out there that have adjustable tension for retention. There are also holsters so finely fitted that it takes some (slight) effort to get the gun out (but they ain't cheap). The thumb break is an option, but you have to train to keep the release paddle out of the way until the gun is far enough out that the strap won't catch on the snap.
 
I like thumb break ccw holsters and depending on the season use them also but I mostly pocket carry so naturally there’s no strap. All my field holsters have straps. I’ve had competition holsters with triggerguard retention that worked well.
 
I tend to agree that a strap gets in the way, which is why I cut mine off. The problem is my Galco won't hold it when I sprint and I am a fast, athletic guy so I need my holster to hold the gun in a full sprint. I am just curious if there is a strapless one that does that job. I find even a thumb break too restrictive. Has anyone had a strapless holster without thumb break that keeps it tight even when running fast? I may just ask milt sparks if their holsters hold up to that.
 
For an OWB holster a proper thumb break snap works great and is a necessity IMHO. A little practice makes the thumb break quick and instinctive. IWB is a different story as you don't have enough gap between the holster and body for the thumb break to release reliably. A good fat roll helps with retention with IWB.
 
Last edited:
No strap for belt carry CCW. Strap for shoulder rigs and OP/duty carry.
 
For "Off Duty" / Plain Clothes I have used Lobo Leathers Pancake holsters for years (negative restraining strap) with 100% satifaction. The holsters are custom made for a particular make, model, and caliber weapon.
 
my revolvers ride in a strapless holster or scabbard from Kramer and are horsehide. Horsehide is almost like kydex as far as retention is concerned.

NOT a cheap solution, but one of the very best for ME!

Randy
 
I use and recommend Safariland ALS holsters for open carry and sure retention in physical exertion. Easy one-handed draw and automatic locking when re-holstered.
 
Last edited:
Our issued uniform holsters had the strap for years & it never slowed me down when I needed my thirty-eight but today’s holster market has a lot more choices.
 
Count me emphatically with K Frame Keith and Oink on this one !

A properly designed Thumbreak is no impediment to smooth and rapid draw . ( On any reasonably well designed holster ) your thumb naturally disengages the strap b as you aquire even a vaguely proper grip on the gun .

Dating myself to particular era , I started journey into handguns just as thumbreaks were becoming a thing , and that has been my thing ever since , when ever possible.

Should I ever have occasional to use a holster without , my thumb is automatically reaching for non existent thumbreak .

And yes over the years , I have hand guns skitter on the floor/ ground three times , and one bounce around the floorboards on a Jeep trail , so my opinions are firmly cemented .

Added - No , none of those Opps ! There goes my gun without me ! Incidents involved a proper thumbreak . It was a now forgotten style of leg holster , an upside down shoulder holster , a belt slide , an issued " semi- retention " laminated duty holster , that unfortunately was designed closely fitted for M10 , but issued M15s . The difference in profile was just enough that the gun didn't fit properly , and the internal pressure points would spontaneously unsnap itself with even casual body movement . If it had been old school leather construction , it would have molded to fit in about a week of wearing , but the new fangled laminate construction holds the original ( incorrect) shape indefinitely .
 
Last edited:
Take a good look at the fitting to the gun of the holster in post 11. That's what you're looking for.

I've never tried a revolver in them, but the Safariland laminate holsters retain semis without straps by fit. The laminate is between the leather outer covering and liner.

There's also pure kydex holsters, but they can be a tad inconsiderate of the finish.
 
No strap. 1791 Gunleather. $59. Very tight. U can turn holster upside down. Google them and watch YouTube video reviews. I have one and another on the way.
 

Attachments

  • E2894F15-04C5-4B62-B123-B5DE1423B505.jpeg
    E2894F15-04C5-4B62-B123-B5DE1423B505.jpeg
    59.1 KB · Views: 23
Back
Top