|
 |

06-03-2017, 05:17 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 64
Liked 4,867 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
Just in time for Dunkirk - Lee-Enfield SMLE MKIII*
__________________
Watch & Pray
Last edited by Dump1567; 07-07-2017 at 05:25 PM.
|
The Following 29 Users Like Post:
|
.455_Hunter, 31FordA, 6518John, Absalom, AlHunt, CajunBass, Cyrano, federali, Frank46, hobby-gunsmith, Hunter Keith, jaymoore, Jebus35745, JohnRippert, kaaskop49, kframeman, kraynky, mauser9, Muddyboot, OLDSTER, pmanton, Richard Simmons, SailDesign, SC_Mike, Texas Star, tndrfttom, vonn, Vulcan Bob, will527 |

06-03-2017, 05:49 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,762
Likes: 10,103
Liked 28,017 Times in 8,454 Posts
|
|
Nice find! I would definitely read the stamping on the metal as 1943. Looking at the other digits, I'd expect a 0 to be more elongated. In case you weren't aware, MA stands for Munitions Australia and is an acronym used by the Lithgow SAF.
Last edited by Absalom; 06-03-2017 at 05:52 PM.
|

06-03-2017, 05:55 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 64
Liked 4,867 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
Nice find! I would definitely read the stamping on the metal as 1943. Looking at the other digits, I'd expect a 0 to be more elongated. In case you weren't aware, MA stands for Munitions Australia and is an acronym used by the Lithgow SAF.
|
Thanks. I looked at a few pics of 1943's and mine looks the same.
__________________
Watch & Pray
|

06-03-2017, 07:23 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: HOUSTON, TEXAS
Posts: 10,417
Likes: 7,281
Liked 14,764 Times in 5,565 Posts
|
|
Splendid rifle, I have an Ishapore but that is not the same for purists.
|

06-03-2017, 07:58 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Outside Philadelphia Pa
Posts: 16,601
Likes: 7,342
Liked 17,204 Times in 7,303 Posts
|
|
1918 SMLE with mint bore 
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
|
The Following 10 Users Like Post:
|
|

06-03-2017, 10:50 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,022
Likes: 17,489
Liked 9,259 Times in 2,274 Posts
|
|
I had heard that some of the soldiers that had them removed the butt plates and painted their names under and replaced it. Might be worth a look.
Either way nice rifle.
__________________
Isaiah 41:10
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-04-2017, 10:55 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,065
Likes: 1,742
Liked 9,996 Times in 3,631 Posts
|
|
I agree a (19)43 mfg.
The 'MA' stands for what ever the author of the book or article says it stands for. Munitions Australia (their Telegraph address early on),,or simply a play on 'Made in Australia'.
These are 2 versions I've seen in print from but I can't recall anything like a document or original Gov't order that plants the designation firmly in one or the other.
They both sound plausible as do some others I've seen. But no 'factory letter' as of yet that I know of to document any of them. Please advise if there is as I'd like to know myself as a long time L/E rifle fan.
The # up on the muzzle end of the forend (last pic) should be the ser# of the rifle if matching wood. 'E' prefix guns were 1942 to 44. and were assembled at the Orange feeder factory.
The B underneath the # suggests a BSA mfg forend though (if the B is in script font), Hard to tell. If the ser# matches the recv'r, it's the original wood
Stock may be marked MAO or OMA showing rifle assembly at Orange.
Stocks were supplied to Lithgow by Slazengers, a sporting goods wood working mfg turned War Time stock maker for the effort.
Stocks generally have SLAZ marked on the bottom edge of the forend and the butt stock grip but can be faint to start with and wear off from use.
Trigger guard looks like it's BA marked. Thats the Bathhurst feeder factory maker of small parts for the main arsenal at Lithgow.
Wellington & Forbes feeder factorys were other parts makers for Lithgow and their code stamped on the small parts were WA and FA. Most of their parts (sight parts mostly) went to Orange for assembly.
Inspector marks from Lithgow are generally a L/Broadarrow/#.
Orange are O/Broadarrow/#.
An inspection mark at Sydney will be a Crown/#/S
The # being the inspectorsID #
Nice rifle and the price was inline with the current market. They are not $100 surplus rifles any more and tough to find a nice condition one too.
Congrats and have fun with it.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|

06-04-2017, 12:21 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 64
Liked 4,867 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2152hq
I agree a (19)43 mfg.
The 'MA' stands for what ever the author of the book or article says it stands for. Munitions Australia (their Telegraph address early on),,or simply a play on 'Made in Australia'.
These are 2 versions I've seen in print from but I can't recall anything like a document or original Gov't order that plants the designation firmly in one or the other.
They both sound plausible as do some others I've seen. But no 'factory letter' as of yet that I know of to document any of them. Please advise if there is as I'd like to know myself as a long time L/E rifle fan.
The # up on the muzzle end of the forend (last pic) should be the ser# of the rifle if matching wood. 'E' prefix guns were 1942 to 44. and were assembled at the Orange feeder factory.
The B underneath the # suggests a BSA mfg forend though (if the B is in script font), Hard to tell. If the ser# matches the recv'r, it's the original wood
Stock may be marked MAO or OMA showing rifle assembly at Orange.
Stocks were supplied to Lithgow by Slazengers, a sporting goods wood working mfg turned War Time stock maker for the effort.
Stocks generally have SLAZ marked on the bottom edge of the forend and the butt stock grip but can be faint to start with and wear off from use.
Trigger guard looks like it's BA marked. Thats the Bathhurst feeder factory maker of small parts for the main arsenal at Lithgow.
Wellington & Forbes feeder factorys were other parts makers for Lithgow and their code stamped on the small parts were WA and FA. Most of their parts (sight parts mostly) went to Orange for assembly.
Inspector marks from Lithgow are generally a L/Broadarrow/#.
Orange are O/Broadarrow/#.
An inspection mark at Sydney will be a Crown/#/S
The # being the inspectorsID #
Nice rifle and the price was inline with the current market. They are not $100 surplus rifles any more and tough to find a nice condition one too.
Congrats and have fun with it.
|
Thanks for the info. I popped off the hand guard and my barrel is dated 1/44.
I also noticed my stock doesn't have the recoil plates. I've heard this is common on the 43/44's. It does have a piece of metal where the stock hits the receiver ring. There's also no indication it's a Jovino import.
I'm not real concerned with it, as I don't expect to put more than 40-100 rounds through it while I'm the owner.
__________________
Watch & Pray
|

06-04-2017, 12:52 PM
|
 |
US Veteran
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: East of Stick Marsh, Fla.
Posts: 11,567
Likes: 6,461
Liked 27,389 Times in 8,007 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2152hq
Nice rifle and the price was inline with the current market. They are not $100 surplus rifles any more and tough to find a nice condition one too.
Congrats and have fun with it.
|
Prices have definitely changed over the years. I bought two in the mid 1970 for $30 apiece. I do have a Lithgow MK III*, but it is was changed over to a .22 trainer in 1949 got lucky and paid $100 for it.
Nice rifle. Hope you make a profit on it.
__________________
USMC 69-93 Combat Pistol Inst.
Last edited by AJ; 06-04-2017 at 03:42 PM.
|

06-04-2017, 01:21 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Lost Wages, NV
Posts: 22,361
Likes: 29,200
Liked 33,780 Times in 12,480 Posts
|
|
That's a fair price for a Lithgow that nice. I posted a couple of pictures of mine in the WWII fireams thread. Post Your WWI and WWII Firearms
__________________
Release the Kraken
|

06-04-2017, 10:43 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 11,651
Liked 2,937 Times in 1,103 Posts
|
|
That's a nice #1MkIII*, and a good price these days. I used to have a Lithgow #1MkIII from 1918, it was a good rifle. The Lee Enfield is probably my favorite rifle, I have three at present. Two are #4Mk2, the other is a 1916 #1MkIII*, built at Enfield. My #1MkIII* was one of the rifles the British transferred to the Irish Free State army during the Irish Civil War from '22-'23. Even though Grandmom was Anti-Treaty it's special to have a rifle that was in Ireland when she was.
__________________
Wheel guns are real guns.
|

06-05-2017, 12:46 AM
|
 |
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,762
Likes: 10,103
Liked 28,017 Times in 8,454 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2152hq
I agree a (19)43 mfg.
The 'MA' stands for what ever the author of the book or article says it stands for. Munitions Australia (their Telegraph address early on),,or simply a play on 'Made in Australia'.
These are 2 versions I've seen in print from but I can't recall anything like a document or original Gov't order that plants the designation firmly in one or the other.
They both sound plausible as do some others I've seen. But no 'factory letter' as of yet that I know of to document any of them. Please advise if there is as I'd like to know myself as a long time L/E rifle fan.
.......
|
Frustratingly, on the official LSAF fact sheet the MA acronym is the only one that is not literally transcribed, only explained (see highlighted, attached). So the Lithgow folks themselves may not know (any more?).
But in view of the fact that all other acronyms used at Lithgow have a concrete location-specific meaning, I do not find Made in Australia or, alternatively sometimes quoted, Manufacture Australia, particularly plausible. The telegraphic M-address, which Lithgow had since 1912, would be something concrete at least; in the absence of actual evidence, I think I'll stick with that  .
|

06-05-2017, 02:06 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 3,259
Likes: 1,224
Liked 2,527 Times in 1,044 Posts
|
|
Nice. Some years ago I happened onto a #1 Mk. III* with its share of dings but an excellent bore. It was marked SSA and 1917. After some time in Skennerton's book I found that the "SSA" on the tang stood for "Standard Small Arms" and was indicative of a "peddled scheme" rifle. Due to a severe demand for rifle production ,offbeat firms would turn out receivers and rifles would be assembled around them; sort of mixmasters, if you will. Apparently they are somewhat uncommon and not all documented.
It's a decent shooter. Sort of makes you wonder where it's been and what it saw. There was still a lot of dying to be done in 1917 and 1918.
Last edited by Bat Guano; 06-05-2017 at 02:08 AM.
|

06-05-2017, 08:43 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: So. Florida
Posts: 766
Likes: 2,080
Liked 1,711 Times in 520 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bat Guano
Nice. Some years ago I happened onto a #1 Mk. III* with its share of dings but an excellent bore. It was marked SSA and 1917. After some time in Skennerton's book I found that the "SSA" on the tang stood for "Standard Small Arms" and was indicative of a "peddled scheme" rifle. Due to a severe demand for rifle production ,offbeat firms would turn out receivers and rifles would be assembled around them; sort of mixmasters, if you will. Apparently they are somewhat uncommon and not all documented.
|
I've got a Standard Small Arms marked No. 1 Mk. III thats been around. It has Australian wood and some metal parts but managed to hang on to its magazine cut-off and windage-adjustable rear sight. It also has Siamese contract bolt.
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

06-05-2017, 08:46 AM
|
 |
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,762
Likes: 10,103
Liked 28,017 Times in 8,454 Posts
|
|
Here is the "official" answer that I just got back from Lithgow:
"Nobody knows for sure what MA means. The main contenders are "Munitions Australia" or "Mach Arms". We lean in favour of Mach Arms as the Lithgow Factory used it as its telex address for a long time. The Factory used MA on much of its rifle and bayonet production from late 20s/early 30s right up to the L1A1 era (1980s).
Kind regards,
Donna White
Custodian, Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum"
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

06-05-2017, 10:22 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,065
Likes: 1,742
Liked 9,996 Times in 3,631 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
Here is the "official" answer that I just got back from Lithgow:
"Nobody knows for sure what MA means. The main contenders are "Munitions Australia" or "Mach Arms". We lean in favour of Mach Arms as the Lithgow Factory used it as its telex address for a long time. The Factory used MA on much of its rifle and bayonet production from late 20s/early 30s right up to the L1A1 era (1980s).
Kind regards,
Donna White
Custodian, Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum"
|
Thank you taking the time to make the inquiry and post the response.
'Mach Arms' is one I had not heard of before and will add to the list of possibilities.
As the Lithgow Factory itself does not have as of now an answer, I will stick with that,,it's unknown at this time..
and that anyone claiming to know the real answer and putting it in published print needs to back up their claim(s) with facts.
Too many of these assumed facts become set in stone facts over time by mere repetition in print and now on the net.
Last edited by 2152hq; 06-05-2017 at 10:24 AM.
|

06-05-2017, 11:01 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 64
Liked 4,867 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
Frustratingly, on the official LSAF fact sheet the MA acronym is the only one that is not literally transcribed, only explained (see highlighted, attached). So the Lithgow folks themselves may not know (any more?).
But in view of the fact that all other acronyms used at Lithgow have a concrete location-specific meaning, I do not find Made in Australia or, alternatively sometimes quoted, Manufacture Australia, particularly plausible. The telegraphic M-address, which Lithgow had since 1912, would be something concrete at least; in the absence of actual evidence, I think I'll stick with that  .
|
The factory info. you uploaded shows a list of "Issue Marks". Where are these located on the rifle?
Thanks.
__________________
Watch & Pray
|

06-05-2017, 04:01 PM
|
 |
SWCA Member Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,762
Likes: 10,103
Liked 28,017 Times in 8,454 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dump1567
The factory info. you uploaded shows a list of "Issue Marks". Where are these located on the rifle?
Thanks.
|
I don not know. I'm hoping a rifle collector can help with your question; I'm not one. I found the list and originally contacted the Lithgow museum for research into the Australian-issued S&W Pre-Victory and Victory revolvers that were FTR'd there. Sorry  .
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-05-2017, 04:50 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 64
Liked 4,867 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absalom
I don not know. I'm hoping a rifle collector can help with your question; I'm not one. I found the list and originally contacted the Lithgow museum for research into the Australian-issued S&W Pre-Victory and Victory revolvers that were FTR'd there. Sorry  .
|
Thanks. I figured it out. They place the mark on top of the receiver above the serial number. My doesn't have one. Probably just had to get it off to war and it didn't matter where it ended-up.
__________________
Watch & Pray
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-06-2017, 12:25 AM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,065
Likes: 1,742
Liked 9,996 Times in 3,631 Posts
|
|
Most all of the Issue Marks will be found stamped into the right side of the butt stock. Butt stocks got changed out both in service and after being surplused out so originality or lack of markings can be difficult to determine sometimes.
Many have multiple issue markings with the older ones being 'barred out' to exempt them. Especially with the different Military District issues and the Civilian Military Forces markings.
Navy markings were generally on the left side of the 'socket'.
The Australian Property marking(s) can be found about anywhere on the rifle, just as the English Broadarrow can on their items.
(Australian Light Horse (ALH) marking is one that is quite often faked onto a rifle in hopes of upping the value.
Remfg'd hooked quillon '07 bayonets are common. There's modern repro's of the bayonet now for those who can't afford the real curio.
Like any other field of collecting,,if it's rare and pricey,,the fakers move in)
|
The Following User Likes This Post:
|
|

06-07-2017, 03:56 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Northeast
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 8,879
Liked 2,968 Times in 1,772 Posts
|
|
Very nice and thanks for sharing. Just learned a lot myself from the posts concerning this model. The markings and stampings alone are an education in themselves. Hope your right concerning the movie spurring collector interest in milsurps. Been following prices on 98ks lately like my father's 98k and am surprised to see how much a matching unmolested example brings today. Hope you enjoy yours.
|

07-07-2017, 05:25 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 64
Liked 4,867 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
__________________
Watch & Pray
Last edited by Dump1567; 07-07-2017 at 05:28 PM.
|
The Following 5 Users Like Post:
|
|

07-11-2017, 07:27 PM
|
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Demon-class planet
Posts: 7,606
Likes: 30,339
Liked 8,735 Times in 3,896 Posts
|
|
The Jovino imports I handled back in the 90s were redolent of coconut; apparently some type of coconut oil was used to lubricate/preserve them. Like shooting a Mounds bar.
Kaaskop49
Shield #5103
|
The Following 2 Users Like Post:
|
|

07-11-2017, 08:11 PM
|
US Veteran Absent Comrade
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 20,361
Likes: 24,260
Liked 16,170 Times in 7,411 Posts
|
|
On YouTube, there's a BBC (?) movie about the Battle of the Somme. MANY of the .303 rifles are really No. 4's modded to take a No. 1 bayonet. I guess the No. 1 MK III is now uncommon even in the UK.
If you watch the movies I've posted about here, Safari and, Flame Over India, you'll see both No. 1 and No. 4 rifles, although in the case of the Indian one, set in 1905, the No. 4 was incorrect. I'm sure the Indian Army "extras" just carried the rifles they were issued when the film was made, in 1960.
|

07-11-2017, 08:51 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,436
Likes: 64
Liked 4,867 Times in 933 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Star
On YouTube, there's a BBC (?) movie about the Battle of the Somme. MANY of the .303 rifles are really No. 4's modded to take a No. 1 bayonet. I guess the No. 1 MK III is now uncommon even in the UK.
If you watch the movies I've posted about here, Safari and, Flame Over India, you'll see both No. 1 and No. 4 rifles, although in the case of the Indian one, set in 1905, the No. 4 was incorrect. I'm sure the Indian Army "extras" just carried the rifles they were issued when the film was made, in 1960.
|
"Gandhi" seemed to get it right for a few scenes.
__________________
Watch & Pray
|

07-11-2017, 09:16 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Minden, Nevada
Posts: 3,626
Likes: 2,014
Liked 5,301 Times in 1,738 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2152hq
Stocks were supplied to Lithgow by Slazengers, a sporting goods wood working mfg turned War Time stock maker for the effort.
|
When did Slazengers start making golf balls? Maybe I should ask Auric Goldfinger.
When Dunkirk comes around to Carson City, I want to see if there are any Lanchester Mk. 1 or Mk. 1* submachneguns in the movie.
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
|
|
|
|