Interpret this: "Crash induced unrest.."

tomhenry

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Messages
609
Reaction score
648
Washington's Blog

Officials and Experts Warn of Crash-Induced Unrest

Numerous high-level officials and experts warn that the economic crisis could lead to unrest world-wide - even in developed countries:

Today, Moody's warned that future tax rises and spending cuts could trigger social unrest in a range of countries from the developing to the developed world, that in the coming years, evidence of social unrest and public tension may become just as important signs of whether a country will be able to adapt as traditional economic metrics, that a fiscal crisis remains a possibility for a leading economy, and that 2010 would be a "tumultuous year for sovereign debt issuers".
The U.S. Army War College warned in 2008 November warned in a monograph [click on Policypointers' pdf link to see the report] titled "Known Unknowns: Unconventional 'Strategic Shocks' in Defense Strategy Development" of crash-induced unrest:
The military must be prepared, the document warned, for a "violent, strategic dislocation inside the United States," which could be provoked by "unforeseen economic collapse," "purposeful domestic resistance," "pervasive public health emergencies" or "loss of functioning political and legal order." The "widespread civil violence," the document said, "would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security." "An American government and defense establishment lulled into complacency by a long-secure domestic order would be forced to rapidly divest some or most external security commitments in order to address rapidly expanding human insecurity at home," it went on. "Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States. Further, DoD [the Department of Defense] would be, by necessity, an essential enabling hub for the continuity of political authority in a multi-state or nationwide civil conflict or disturbance," the document read.
Director of National Intelligence Dennis C. Blair said:
"The global economic crisis ... already looms as the most serious one in decades, if not in centuries ... Economic crises increase the risk of regime-threatening instability if they are prolonged for a one- or two-year period," said Blair. "And instability can loosen the fragile hold that many developing countries have on law and order, which can spill out in dangerous ways into the international community."***

"Statistical modeling shows that economic crises increase the risk of regime-threatening instability if they persist over a one-to-two-year period."***

"The crisis has been ongoing for over a year, and economists are divided over whether and when we could hit bottom. Some even fear that the recession could further deepen and reach the level of the Great Depression. Of course, all of us recall the dramatic political consequences wrought by the economic turmoil of the 1920s and 1930s in Europe, the instability, and high levels of violent extremism."

Blair made it clear that - while unrest was currently only happening in Europe - he was worried this could happen within the United States.

[See also this].

Former national security director Zbigniew Brzezinski warned "there's going to be growing conflict between the classes and if people are unemployed and really hurting, hell, there could be even riots."

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff warned the the financial crisis is the highest national security concern for the U.S., and warned that the fallout from the crisis could lead to of "greater instability".
Others warning of crash-induced unrest include:
The head of the World Trade Organization
The head of the International Monetary Fund (and see this)
The head of the World Bank
Senator Christopher Dodd
Congressman Ron Paul (radio interview on March 6, 2009)

Britian's MI5 security agency
Leading economic historian Niall Ferguson
Leading economist Marc Faber and billionaire investor Jim Rogers
Leading economist Nouriel Roubini
Leading economist John Williams
Top trend researcher Gerald Calente
European think tank Leap2020
 
Register to hide this ad
It shouldn't be of any surprise that we are in for some very interesting times. I think I may need to get some more ammunition.
 
Atlanta already has organized bands of smash and grab robbers. They are hitting a handful of retail businesses every night.

Home invasions are also up in trendy Atlanta neighborhoods.

It won't be long before we start seeing walled properties and communities with armed guards like you see in many turd world countries today.
 
I think I may need to get some more ammunition.
That's what I used to think. But then I asked myself, "When it comes down to actual shooting, how many magazines do you think you'll get through before they get you?"
:(
 
Prepared

"Pried from my cold, dead fingers"

Wrong gun, you let them get too close, wrong caliber and they got too close, not enough magazines and they got too close.

How long can you shoot before reloading or changing mags?

Accuracy and firepower -- keep the zombies at bay!
 
Extra ammo is indeed important in case you win a few of the fights. In a confrontation with roving gangs of criminals, always shoot the one who looks like the leader first. If you can get a few of them before they get you the others may figure it ain't worth the trouble. If they do run keep shooting at them and maybe they won't try to come back. Let at least one escape so he can go back and tell others about the crazy man with all of the ammo. Yeah, you need some more ammo. Get an extra gun or two in case the one you are using gets too hot.
 
Financially, this country is headed for the same place Germany was headed at the start of the Great Depression. A lot of people are being promised a lot of things which can't POSSIBLY be delivered. When those goodies are cut off or never show up in the first place, then the existing entitlements peter out, there's going to be REAL trouble.

When there's no money left to pay them and their own families are in the same danger as everyone else, the police are going to have to choose between them and you. Don't bet on you.

It's all well and good to stockpile food, water and other goods as some commentators have recommended, but if you don't have the ability to maintain possession of them, the first person with the will to take them away from you is going to leave you empty handed... if you're lucky.
 
BS, at least in the USA. Look at the difference between the Tea Parties here and the leftists in Copenhagen.

We'll just VOTE THE BAS**RDS OUT OF OFFICE in 2010. Ram it down our throats in 2009 and we'll shove it up their donkey in 2010.
 
"When it comes down to actual shooting, how many magazines do you think you'll get through before they get you?"
:(

When I was a kid, the ranchers used to shoot coyotes and hang their carcasses on a fence post around the ranch as a warning to other coyotes. I don't know if the coyotes were smart enough to get the message.

If there is a complete break-down in government and law & order and anarchy reigns, then the second group of predators that comes to my house will find the heads of the first group impaled on sticks. Hopefully, they will be smart enough to get the message. If not, then all I can do is trust my marksmanship. And how much ammunition will I use before they get me? A lot.
 
Meth head tweekers are smash and grabbin' around here. Busting gates, garage doors and houses lookin' for property they can easily fence/scrap/barter.
If Arkansas would change it's law to mirror Tejas in using deadly force to protect property I'd bait the field and relieve society of some of these fearless of prosecution to the full extent of the law POS.
--------------
BTW, since your money is worthless you might as well buy somethin' of value while you can.

I'm sittin' on a case of Vienna sausage and a couple of Saltine tins so I reckon I'm good to go.
 
Last edited:
BS, at least in the USA.
...until the Chinese want their money back.

This administration and this Congress are hell bent to destroy the economy as we know it. They're not just trying to do things which are ill-advised, but things which are mathematically IMPOSSIBLE. By the time they're done, Zimbabwe will be sending US aid.

What do you think's going to happen when there are no jobs, no taxpayers, and no services payed for by taxes? Even the dumbest will realize they've been played and they're going to cold, hungry, and MAD.

The Weimar government totally screwed up the German economy. That made people VERY receptive to somebody who'd "fix" things. When things get REALLY bad here, whom will ignorant, bitter people support to "fix" the Obama legacy?

I don't want to live in Chile, Allende's OR Pinochet's.
 
Could be, but hope not. Hey cmort- I'm a buckeye too. Lyndhurst to Willoughby to Euclid to Youngstown. Got moved in 1981 (the carter crash). My stepmother lives in Bay Village.
 
phils;
We'll just VOTE THE BAS**RDS OUT OF OFFICE in 2010. Ram it down our throats in 2009 and we'll shove it up their donkey in 2010.

+100

This is how we will do it, and it's the ONLY way that we can turn things around. Be safe, and be prepared for the worst, but don't think things are going to get any better until we run these idiots out of town.


WG840
 
+100

This is how we will do it, and it's the ONLY way that we can turn things around. Be safe, and be prepared for the worst, but don't think things are going to get any better until we run these idiots out of town.


WG840

I just hope we are smart enough to do it. I mean our track record hasn't been so great. We voted in carter, clinton, the current idiot in chief, polosi, reid, kennedy etc.
 
pogo.jpg


Some of us, at any rate.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top