Hi folks,
First post, long time lurker:
I just PM'ed Stainz about this issue when it occurred to me that it would be useful to get some other perspectives.
I'm looking for the do-everything-well .357 revolver. I know, I know. It doesn't exist. I just want to come as close as I can.
What does do-everything-well mean to me? Primarily it carries well in the field as a hunting/hiking/woods loafing gun. It also can handle the stoutest factory .357's, is easy and fun to shoot on the range, is quick handling, durable, reliable and can function well as a home defense firearm. It also would allow me to compete in a variety of revolver competitions.
I've narrowed it down to the 627 Pro and the 686 SSR. The 686 SSR seems like the obvious choice, but I'm attracted to the 8 shot capacity of the 627. That N frame looks bulky and heavy for woods carry, but on paper it isn't all that heavier than the 686.
What do you guys think? Help this avowed 1911 guy make his choice!
First post, long time lurker:
I just PM'ed Stainz about this issue when it occurred to me that it would be useful to get some other perspectives.
I'm looking for the do-everything-well .357 revolver. I know, I know. It doesn't exist. I just want to come as close as I can.
What does do-everything-well mean to me? Primarily it carries well in the field as a hunting/hiking/woods loafing gun. It also can handle the stoutest factory .357's, is easy and fun to shoot on the range, is quick handling, durable, reliable and can function well as a home defense firearm. It also would allow me to compete in a variety of revolver competitions.
I've narrowed it down to the 627 Pro and the 686 SSR. The 686 SSR seems like the obvious choice, but I'm attracted to the 8 shot capacity of the 627. That N frame looks bulky and heavy for woods carry, but on paper it isn't all that heavier than the 686.
What do you guys think? Help this avowed 1911 guy make his choice!