Cop was off duty.
Why should he have a privilege I can't?
AFS
Cop was off duty.
Why should he have a privilege I can't?
IKEA is private property and entitled to not allow guns.
Off duty cop is called a civilian
AFS
Pretty neat being a super citizen. What other privileges do you think these super citizens should have?And to why should he have a privilege you can't - because you are not a cop. Besides the Chief did not see it as a privilege.
Pretty neat being a super citizen. What other privileges do you think these super citizens should have?
Pretty neat being a super citizen. What other privileges do you think these super citizens should have?
I have been a member of this forum for several years. One of the things I really like about it is that it is made up of polite adults who share common interests. It is not like many fora that seem to exist to give anonymous posters an opportunity to demean others, push their agendas and argue with other people.
I have been reading your posts for the past several days and I just had to comment that you seem to be trying to pick a fight at every turn.
While I respect your and everyone else's opinions, I do not agree with your "trolling" for a fight just to raise people's blood pressure.
I am now off my high horse and I meant no disrespect by my post as this is just my opinion. And I will NOT comment further or respond to any more of your posts.
Cop was off duty.
Why should he have a privilege I can't?
IKEA is private property and entitled to not allow guns.
Off duty cop is called a civilian
AFS
Respectfully sir, you are incorrect in your statement. State statutes vary but in virtually every state in the U.S. a sworn officer is empowered to go armed and to take police action 24/7 under certain circumstances. It is left to agency policy to prescribe when the officer may, or must carry a badge, ID, and firearm and when he is expected to take action while "off duty". A police officer is never fully "off duty". Some agencies require the officer carry badge ,ID, and sidearm 24/7 when outside their domicile. Most if not all agency policies require the officer at least to be armed when in uniform or when in a police vehicle; it would be irresponsible to allow officers to go around in a police uniform without being armed. I am certain the chief was within department policy when he entered the store, which is really a moot point in this unique situation since as the CEO of the agency, he can change the policy any time he wants anyway. The action of the employee who told him he couldn't come into the store armed while in uniform was just plain stupid and unreasonable, and I have to believe motivated by an anti-police agenda. Or maybe just REALLY stupid.Cop was off duty.
Why should he have a privilege I can't?
IKEA is private property and entitled to not allow guns.
Off duty cop is called a civilian
AFS
I'm asking serious questions. And raising serious arguments. Just because you don't like the content doesn't mean it's trolling. You're welcome to hit the report button. Just because you'll no longer hear me sure doesn't mean I won't be out there saying things you don't like.
Instead of your trotting on your high horse, you could have answered the question posed. Pretty clear I'm not wrong with the content. Just the nerve to ask it.
I'd also like to see your posts in defense of the TX OCers being called every name in the book. Since you're such a fan of politeness around here.
Playing devil's advocate can be tricky as folks might get the idea that the position you are arguing is in fact your own belief. And without a wonky face sarcasm can be difficult to read in text with no voice or inflection to go along with it.
Also a serious question that might take a number of words to express can come of as quite snarky if oversimplified.