Model 69 - Their explanation

I'm gonna jump over to the CZ forum and see what kind of trouble I can stir up over there! Thanks Y'all!
 
I have looked at several of these revolvers since they came out. I have been very impressed with them, regardless of where the ball detent sits on the "V." They "feel" good to me. I have small hands and even though I love "N" frame guns and have a lot of them, the "L" frame fits me better. The only thing I don't like about it is the 4.25 inch barrel, but that's just a personal quirk for me. Probably the only reason that I have not bought one, and I have found several at really good prices, is that I have a Model 696 and I probably would not actually shoot magnum ammo in the gun. At least that's how I have rationalized not buying one, YET.
 
kaaskop49 said:
Don't know about you folks, but I love reading things like this!

And people in NYC want to know when I'm coming back to visit. Maybe on a cold day in Hell...
Click to expand...

Hey! They carry their 44 Magnums while they walk their dogs in NYC - don't they? I know some of us who did/do here in Indiana? :)

I can't even recall the last S&W 44 Magnum I bought. (Probably that silly 329PD. :rolleyes:) Dang you guys and all this talk about these Model 69s... :mad:
 
Just got back from walking the dogs (took the 329 today -- may take both 329 & 69 tomorrow, just because I can).

Gonna go play with the grand kids for a bit, then off to the dentist and after that the range.

0430140923_zps0e179f70.jpg


Paul
 
M29since14 said:
:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Just kidding! :D Thanks for your pictures. You guys are going to convince me yet that I need one of those crooked, off-center things - and just when I had convinced myself I didn't need any more pistols. :o

I'll bet that Model 69 was pretty lively with those old Hornady loads. Those were moving right along, weren't they?
Click to expand...

All of those factory loads with the exception of the Speer Gold Dot "Short Barrel" rounds were at best, umm, unpleasant! Have shot worse, though.

In full disclosure, after finally opening a session of P'bucket that didn't want to seize up the computer, I realized that "shotgun pattern" was from the PMC 180gr JHP .44 Special load shown in the "big picture" shot. Almost as bad as some Rem-UMC .38 Special loads!

DSC02542_zpsae7495d4.jpg

DSC02543_zps330768cd.jpg

Light recoil, but poor accuracy. Not a general comdemnation of PMC ammo, though! Just not a happy combination in this instance.
 
Last edited:
CleanHarry said:
Onto the explanation: this is not an issue. The ball detent is not supposed to be centered in the "V". It is in fact supposed to be hitting on one side of the "V" in order to keep the yoke tight to the frame. This is how the detent works.
Click to expand...

I just picked up my 69 and found the same thing, had the same reaction, and received the same answer from the company. (When the call ended, I hadn't hung up for a few seconds as my hands were full, and I could hear her let out a big sigh on the other end.)

The written explanation is much better and, IMO, makes sense. I'm not a mechanical engineer, but I do have a high degree of mechanical aptitude and the explanation seems legit.

If the ball centered in the notch, the pressure would be equal on both sides of the notch which would basically be doing nothing but keeping that ball centered... if the crane were not fully seated for any reason the detent lockup won't care as all it's doing at that point is keeping the ball centered. With the ball putting pressure on the outside edge of the notch, it is putting constant pressure against the crane, keeping it closed.

I think what we are all thinking of initially is a detent designed to seat centered to hold a turning object firmly in a precise position. (like a scope adjustment knob) In this case the detent is designed to put constant closing pressure on the crane, which it would not do as well were it seated in the center.

Whew!

-Doc


EDIT: Even after writing that, another look at the alignment still makes me wonder. I'm going to go to the shops around here today and look at the 66's they have in stock for the same thing. (and any other models that use the method) I'll report back.

EDIT: I called two shops near me, explained what I was curious about, and asked if they wouldn't mind looking at theirs. This is what I've gotten so far:

66 - Centered
69 - Not centered
Governor - Centered
Governor - Centered
69 - Not centered

So, logic dictates that if S&W Engineering is claiming that it's by design for all models that use the detent, then the other models must be defective; they can't have it both ways.

I'm going to call and say that I have a 69 with a centered ball and that I would like to have it repaired due to reading on forums that S&W says it's not supposed to be.

EDIT: I guess I'm convinced enough at this point to not worry about it. I spoke with a different S&W rep who says he's been with them for 37 years, and he also said that it's by design for the purpose of keeping constant closing pressure on the crane. He said that the ones that look centered should still be slightly more to the outside than actually being perfectly centered. With the tolerances in design and manufacture, I can see how some models may be a little more down the notch than others, but the result is the same, if not more aesthetically pleasing. Despite costing the same, they aren't Swiss watches. So I'm going to go with everything I've heard that supports the not-actually-perfectly-centered design idea because it makes more sense from a mechanical standpoint than being centered. Centered just means it's centered; it doesn't mean that the crane is fully closed. Offset is constantly holding the crane closed. Case closed for me. Happy shooting!

-Doc
 
Last edited:
Love my 69! Quick handling, well balanced and straight shooting, what's not to like? The grips! Changed mine to Hogue RB K frame grips.

 
Are there options to replace the front sight blade with a higher one?

Now that I think about it not sure if I want to stay with iron sights (if I buy a 69) or go to a Burris Fast Fire III
 
Last edited:
Snowwolfe said:
Are there options to replace the front sight blade with a higher one?

Now that I think about it not sure if I want to stay with iron sights (if I buy a 69) or go to a Burris Fast Fire III
Click to expand...

My understanding is that it is better to go with a lower rear ramp. I think there are 2 or three sizes from S&W.

-Doc
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Buying a model 69 combat
2 3 4
Replies
69
Views
5K
Shibadog
S
6
Grips for model 69.
Replies
15
Views
1K
mtgianni
M
D
  • Locked
* Retracted *WTT Model 19-5 for Model 69 Combat
Replies
0
Views
405
digitalcrocodile
D
G
4.25" 69 vs 4" 629 Mountain Gun
2 3
Replies
58
Views
6K
malph
M
S
Year of production for Model 36
Replies
4
Views
236
Scott S.
S

Latest posts

Back
Top