I could be biased because of my close call with an attack, but here's the thing. If the numbers were even somewhat close I would be willing to look at the well-worn breed misidentification factor prosecuted by defenders of the pit bull breed notably for decades, that was their big argument in the early 80's CDC study pointing it's finger squarely at pit bull terriers for dog-caused human deaths.
But at some point when your attack and human death numbers are so astronomically high that they are when compared to other large more popular breeds in the multiplied thousandths of percentile higher, you've gotta stop the rhetoric and say, this breed is uniquely wired and needs and deserves unique management and control. Aggressive PR against study after study does nothing to prevent the next attack.
Strayed a bit off topic, so that's my last post here. Peace.