Do we agree that the 2nd Amendment is a vital, unalienable, right? Do we agree the intent of CCW is to protect one's self from grave bodily harm/death? Do we agree that one's right to self-defense is a natural right? Then why is there a push for teacher's to have "extra training?"
In many states, teachers (people) outside of school are allowed to carry in parks, malls, theaters, etc. - places where people (kids) gather, according to various state laws (Constitutional Carry too ...). If the person is incompetent/irresponsible and acts outside of the law, he/she is still accountable. Why is it, "technically," different in a school?
If the idea of CCW is to stop an immediate threat to one's life, then it doesn't matter where it takes place, or ... if they are "trained" or not. While I take classes, train, practice, etc. A LOT, some don't. I see the value in training, and, as a family of educators, I'm fully aware of the trials and tribulations in the classroom. However, if we are in support of the 2nd amendment in its purest form, and also in support of self-defense, then the "extra training for teachers" argument doesn't hold up (despite my agreement that we want ALL 2A fans to be competent) - at least I can't see it ... yet. There is a difference between a LEO who MUST pursue illegal actions and get involved, than a person (teacher) defending his/her life. I just feel that we might be hypocritical in our defense of 2A rights, if we start saying things like, "well this group (-----) needs this to exercise their rights ...". I know this probably rubs people the wrong way, just letting anyone whom is legally allowed to CCW carry in a school, but I feel like we either believe in the 2A and why CCW is an essential right, or we don't... Am I way off?