Sig P365 or Glock 26?

[CH4]

G26! and I am a definite earlier production Sig fan, carried one most of my LE career. Although a little chunky (so is my P229), I like the 26 for the cheap, abundant magazines, capacity options of carrying 10-33 rounds; the ability to use the mags in my 9mm AR, reliability and the myriad aftermarket parts and accessories. That said, I’d be interested in the slightly gimmicky 365 SAS if I found one at the right price.

 

[gnystrom]

@ the OP, There is only one person that can correctly answer your question
Get a mirror and ask the person looking back at you, "which one did I shoot the best?"

 

[lrrifleman]

Thank you for your input. I do realize that I am the one to make the ultimate decision.

Yesterday, during a PPC match, I encountered carpal tunnel induced limp wristing with my 1911 and hardball. Yes, I do realize that carpal tunnel is a potentially temporary issue, but it is still disconcerting. After the match, when shooting 9mm vs the 45, I found that I was able to better control the 9mm than the 45. (As a note, after shooting a 45 1911 for almost45 years, yesterday was the first time I had issues with FTEs, which I attribute solely to the carpal tunnel.)

I am looking at either the G26 or the P365 as a candidate for predominantly pocket carry when I am in a free state. While my HSc was the prime candidate for pocket carry, it has been shelved due to an AD caused by a bent firing pin when the slide automatically went into battery. Once it is repaired, it has to regain my trust. Virtually all of the shops that I frequent won't allow me to pocket a pistol, so an in-person comparison of a G26 and a P365 is out of the question, hence my original question.

I also realize that the Sig is under a dark cloud due to the discharge issues of the P320, fortunately the P365 I am contemplating can be had with a manual safety.

Thanks!

 

[LCC]

EDC decisions come down to reliability, carry mode and capacity.
Reliabiity - the current model 365's of the last couple of years are fully reliable, owners have thousands of rounds through them without a hiccup. Those with a dog in the fight against Sig keep making comparisons to either the first gen which had a resolved problem, or other models. Think about what the Glock 42 went through for three iterations before achieving reliability.
Carry mode-the G26 is a small brick, does not pocket carry unless you have enormous cargo pants, and IWB require pants up a waist size. The 365 is slimmer and lighter, 18 oz vs 22 oz, will pocket carry in regular pants, or IWB without having to oversize your pants.
Capacity - a tie. The Glock mags are less expensive and easier to hand load. A couple of mags should suffice for a EDC handgun as it is not a range gun. The Glock can accept larger capacity mags from it's big brothers, the Sig can accomodate a 12 round mag. The stock 365 mags themselves are thinner for pocket carry than the stock 26 mags, part of their design innovation.

If already an owner and fan of a G26, absolutely no xompelling reason to trade it for a 365, $ are already invested in a very reliable weapon. If new to the sub-compact semi striker carry, however, if unable to range test both at least thoroughly handle them at your LGS. Pocket them, waist carry them, sight them, dry fire them. For a micro compact EDC, my money will be on the Sig.

 

[Chief Wiggums]

Hmm......
shoot both if you can
run a box thru each
buy the one that you shoot better

 

[doc84]

Thank you for your input. I do realize that I am the one to make the ultimate decision.

Yesterday, during a PPC match, I encountered carpal tunnel induced limp wristing with my 1911 and hardball. Yes, I do realize that carpal tunnel is a potentially temporary issue, but it is still disconcerting. After the match, when shooting 9mm vs the 45, I found that I was able to better control the 9mm than the 45. (As a note, after shooting a 45 1911 for almost45 years, yesterday was the first time I had issues with FTEs, which I attribute solely to the carpal tunnel.)

I am looking at either the G26 or the P365 as a candidate for predominantly pocket carry when I am in a free state. While my HSc was the prime candidate for pocket carry, it has been shelved due to an AD caused by a bent firing pin when the slide automatically went into battery. Once it is repaired, it has to regain my trust. Virtually all of the shops that I frequent won't allow me to pocket a pistol, so an in-person comparison of a G26 and a P365 is out of the question, hence my original question.

I also realize that the Sig is under a dark cloud due to the discharge issues of the P320, fortunately the P365 I am contemplating can be had with a manual safety.

Thanks!

In my experience, the G26 is not pocketable in anything other than a leg cargo pocket. FWIW, the only gun that I can pocket carry is a J frame. That is the niche role for my 442. I am just over the Commodore Barry. PM me if you want to lay hands on a G26 and you can see what I am talking about.

 

[Sistema1927]

I have both. While the G26 is a great gun, and I actually shoot it better than my G17, it is no way a pocket gun, at least for me.

The P365, however, is in my pocket right now, in an Alabama Pocket Holster, just like it is most days. It is also no slouch in the shooting department either, it handles like a much larger gun, once again, at least for me.

IANAL, YMMV, etc.

 

[bigben55]

Glock 43x.

Ships with 10rd mags, but you can get a Shield Arms mag thats flush fit and holds 15. I love mine. I actually sold my gen 3 G26 once I got the 43x

 

[Speedo2]

If it's an "either-or" decision between a G26 or a P365, then I'd go with the Sig, mostly because of size. However, given more unlimited options, and assuming that you're going to stay with 9mm, then I'd give the G43 some consideration.

I've accumulated a few 9mm CCW's over the past few years, searching for that 4-leaf clover; something that I can shoot well, still fits in my pockets and that's nearly 100% reliable. I've accumulated the following: G26, M&P9c, M&P9Shield, Sig's 365SAS and a 365XL, along with several J-frames and "mouse guns" in 38 Spl, 380 and 32 ACP. Somehow I find myself carrying a G42 most of the time. For me, I think that 8 rounds (Magguts follower) of soft shooting 380 should suffice in most situations; it's easy to rack its slide if necessary; and it rides very well in almost every pocket. And it's a Glock. I do sometimes wish that it was a 9mm, but they weren't available back when I bought my G42. I've read that a G43's slide is a bit stiff to rack, but I've never tried one. Just some more thoughts for your consideration. -S2

 

[BAM-BAM]

I tried to like the G-26 on two separate occasions ..... felt chubby in my hand... sold them and...... went back to my S&W 3913/14s.

Couple of friends that swear by the Sig 365..... I love the old P series Sigs..... but the 365 doesn't seem worth a $600-800(mags and holster) experiment to my needs.

I'm sticking with my 30 year old tech in the 3913/14/NLs I have.... if I feel I need/want more than 8+1 I'm going to a 6906 (12+1) or Beretta Compact at 15+1

 

[oldiegoldie]

not a striker guy, but i have 2 P365 MS and find them nearly the perfect carry pistol. the P365 checks nearly all the boxes for me. i do wish the safety levers were a little more substantial. mine have been 100% reliable.

the G26 has some advantages....it's been around for 25 years, so if there were any bugs, they have all been worked out. replacement parts are easy to find.

that said i plan to keep the Sigs and no plans to buy a P26.

 

[saemetric]

Like both but this is my edc for now.

 

[fredj338]

I carry a g26 daily but only becauseci cant readily get a p365. The 365 is slimmer, easier to tote all day.

 

[Ogandydancer]

Neither one as both are striker fired and I do not care for striker fired weapons.

 

[sotexas]

P 365 (I have a XL) as I am not much of a Glock fan. I carry a Hellcat which is Grrrreat

 

[uncleted327]

Anyone trying to argue the Glock is better because of reliability or price is ridiculous. Everything is expensive these days and what a 365 goes for today versus what you paid for a G26 years ago is irrelevant. There is also no difference in reliability, that goes for any Glock versus any quality handgun these days. @OP if you are looking for something to pocket carry I would say the Sig wins two hands down. I'm a big guy with big pockets and a G26/27/33 is a damn brick in a pocket. Anyone telling you it isn't is selling something. If you can find either at a LGS ask them if you can slip it into your pocket and you'll find out really quickly which is one is for you.

 

[Cellar Hound]

I am a huge fan of the Glock 19.....

That being said, the Sig P365 is like a magic trick....

How do you fit 10 rounds into a tiny little gun?

Yes, it is possible....

Trigger.... nice!

To be fair, I don’t own a G26 but my 365 has all the concealed carry gun can offer plus an extra few rounds.

 

[fastreb999]

I have both a Gen 2 G26 and a P365. Both have been 100% reliable so far with any load I've stuffed in the magazine. To me, the P365 feels better in the hand, although both shoot about the same. If the choice were mine, after comparing the two in my hand, and factoring in that you want the pistol for pocket carry, I would choose the P365. If that weren't a concern, it would be a toss up.

 

[MCorps0311]

Well I don't have G26,but I do own a Sig P365 and love it.

 

[jeeps]

Went G26 because of its long track record of being reliable, robust and better shooting accuracy. The Sig did not shoot as well for me and did not seem as well made as the G26. The G26 is still the Gold Standard for me .