Do we still like 3" J-frames? Model 37

I traded a 1880 built .38 caliber single action top break with 90% nickle plating and in nice shape for my 37-1 with the slightly less than 2" barrel. I like them a lot, yours looks very nice indeed.
 

Attachments

  • J193XXX RH.jpg
    J193XXX RH.jpg
    118.7 KB · Views: 61
LOVE my 3" 36-1 (78/79?). Barrel length/sight radius makes for better accuracy at 15 yards and beyond. Longer ejector rod gives positive extraction on .38 special cases. (With the snubs ejector rod is shorter than the case itself and can leave you with a speed loader in your right hand shaking your revolver like a maraca trying to dislodge one or two cases!) I also have a 3" K frame 13-2.

I have to admit I carry my no lock snubby 640P these days. The night sights are the deciding factor, but I WISH it was a 3".
 
Just picked up a three inch SB 36 last week. Traded for a three inch 65 last night. I've always had a thing for three inchers. Own a dozen or more.
 
That his one of my 'Dream Guns' !! That, along with the now, long discontinued Model 12, 4" Round Butt. Just take the time to find an efficient load, that although Non+P, will perform as required. Even limited +P usage may be done, I personally would limit it to sighting in & defensive use only. I'm down to just my 3" M-640, although I truly wish it was an M-642. 3", as it is a bit heavy. LOVE those 3" J Frames, especially alloy versions.

Best, dpast32
 
I used to carry a nickel 3” Mod. 36 with Mustang grips, loaded with 200 grain LRN.
Sweet little gun but I never could get that coil spring action as smooth as I wanted, so I finally moved up to a 2-1/2” Mod. 66…
 
Very nice revolver! I think it is just a light strike...I have seen a few, usually on alloy frames, over the years. In fact, I had an early (flat latch, ser# 25K range) Model 43 (3.5") that was the same way. Enjoy!
 
Last edited:
We still do around here.


916x8yd.jpg
 
I’m going to be the odd man out and say I never cared for the 3” J Frame, except for how great it looks. I like options and the longer barrel, to my way of thinking, limits those carry options for no real return. I can shoot either one accurately under simulated combat conditions.
 
New to the forum, but I picked up a 3" Ladysmith last month. Doesn't have the original grips but it's a clean gun. Neat balance. BEK serial number, which I think was made in 1989-1990???
 

Attachments

  • B6443C93-1FC7-449B-9CA1-F2F320D19082.jpg
    B6443C93-1FC7-449B-9CA1-F2F320D19082.jpg
    126 KB · Views: 24
Last edited:
New to the forum, but I picked up a 3" Ladysmith last month. Doesn't have the original grips but it's a clean gun. Neat balance. BEK serial number, which I think was made in 1989-1990???

Howdy neighbor, and welcome aboard.

The original grips for your 3" Lady Smith were "anatomically designed for women," according to the Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson, 4th Ed., p 243. I call them Mae West Combats because they have a slight resemblance to S&W's Combat grips of the time. S&W put them on the 3" Lady Smith models 36-3, which I'm guessing is what you have, and 60-3. The 2" equivalents came with smooth laminated rosewood grips.

The Ladies of that era came in a rather homely plastic case.

I believe you're close for your Lady's vintage.
 

Attachments

  • 1989 Model 36-3 Lady Smith (2).jpg
    1989 Model 36-3 Lady Smith (2).jpg
    93 KB · Views: 31
  • 1989 60-3 Lady Smith with Mae West stocks (2).jpg
    1989 60-3 Lady Smith with Mae West stocks (2).jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 27
  • 36-2 LS 1989 (2).jpg
    36-2 LS 1989 (2).jpg
    116.8 KB · Views: 28
Last edited:
my 3" 31-1 is my favorite 32 shooter. It has been reamed to take 32 H&R Mag so I could use it for daily carry, but I prefer not to carry exposed hammer guns concealed so it's only a range toy. If I did any woods walking, though, it would be my first choice.
 
Back
Top