Kinda disappointed

Slicktop

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2021
Messages
137
Reaction score
61
Location
Ozark Hogs Country
I sent my beloved 66-1 for tune-up and bead blast.
I have had it for over 20yrs and just wanted to liven it up.
It's been a reliable hunter w/no problems.

It was in the shop 10 months.
Got it back and dry fired 5 or 6 times and it locked up.
Sent it back for repair to be expedited.
Got it back in 3wks. (Good)
Shot a full cylinder of 158gr 357 fmj Norma.
Empties would not eject. Had to forcibly remove every case.

Also, while this is a petty but valid complaint, the front sight came back originally with a new nylon front sight in black. I figgered it was an overlooked item to put on the red overlay and when I sent it back they would see that it needed to be done.
It wasn't.
How do I treat the cylinder so the casings won't stick?
I don't want to sound like a rag.
But it was 10 months, a lot of $, I had to send it back, and I'm having problems never experienced.
 

Attachments

  • 20211117_180849.jpg
    20211117_180849.jpg
    90.1 KB · Views: 336
  • 20211117_173631.jpg
    20211117_173631.jpg
    110.7 KB · Views: 353
Register to hide this ad
I wonder if the casings sticking might be due to overspray from the blasting media. If the inside of the cylinder got textured during the rehab, that could cause the casings to hang up.

Could be.
I actually commend the finish and it looks like they took care around the serial # area, so one would think they would treat the inside of chambers the same.
I really hate to complain but with the returned gun was a end cap of the ammo that I guess they used for testing.
Here's a pic and a pic of what I used.
 

Attachments

  • 20211117_184315.jpg
    20211117_184315.jpg
    82.3 KB · Views: 253
  • 20211117_184337.jpg
    20211117_184337.jpg
    92.1 KB · Views: 231
Could be.
I actually commend the finish and it looks like they took care around the serial # area, so one would think they would treat the inside of chambers the same.
I really hate to complain but with the returned gun was a end cap of the ammo that I guess they used for testing.
Here's a pic and a pic of what I used.

Now that is odd - the 29-2 I just had returned had the exact same American Eagle 357 Magnum box flap enclosed in the shipping box. I thought this was just a scrap that fell into the packaging so I would take that test fire proof (if that is what it is supposed to be) for what it's worth!
 

Attachments

  • 283BD2E6-4676-4269-B10C-036C3CEBFE2B.jpg
    283BD2E6-4676-4269-B10C-036C3CEBFE2B.jpg
    49 KB · Views: 37
Last edited:
Now that is odd - the 29-2 I just had returned had the exact same American Eagle 357 Magnum box flap enclosed in the shipping box. I thought this was just a scrap that fell into the packaging so I would take that test fire proof (if that is what it is supposed to be) for what it's worth!

I thought it was weird without any other explanation.
 
There must be something else going on besides the chambers getting bead blasted.

Bead blasting does not add material, it does not make cylinder chambers smaller. Let's say something roughed up the walls... one should be able to see that. After a cleaning, chambers on my Model 66 look shiny. Even empty 357 cases drop in and out. It should be possible to exclude that as a cause on inspection. If they look shiny, they were not bead blasted.

I would try different ammo before doing anything with the chambers, and maybe ask your range to let you have a few empty cases from rounds fired in other guns, to see how they fit.
 
Will try different ammo today after cleaning.
.38 spl. in different flavors, and if that goes good then move up to Buffalo Bore Hardcast .357.

I have only shot the Norma in my rifle beforehand but it did fine.
We'll see what happens.
 
Back
Top